[新聞] 網友連署「台灣時間提前1小時」 與日韓無時差消失
1.媒體來源:
蘋果日報
2.完整新聞標題:
網友連署「台灣時間提前1小時」 與日韓無時差
將台灣時區調整與日韓相同,這個點子您覺得如何!?
日韓(GMT+9)時間比台灣(GMT+8)快一個小時,有網友在國發會網站「公共政策網路參與平
台」發起連署,建議將台灣目前時區提前至GMT+9,與日韓相同,發起者表示,台灣其實
過去也隸屬於GMT+9時區,而目前與台灣類似經緯度的南北韓也屬於GMT+9時區,從GMT+8
改為GMT+9,也可「象徵性的脫離中國(GMT +8)的從屬」,讓外國旅客體會到台灣與中國
的「互不相從屬關係」,而且如果提前一小時,「冬季下班不會這麼暗、夏季也可充分利
用陽光。」,節制目前為止已有2618人附議,超過半數。
提案引起網友兩極討論,贊成的網友表示「當然支持 早該這麼做了」「理由是環保不行
嗎? 長期下來節省很可觀」「已附議」「能跟日韓同時區,真的潮!」「日光節約我覺
得概念很好」「日光節約 減少照明量 很好啊」,反對的網友則認為「本來贊同,但一打
開時區圖覺得差太多」「覺得沒必要,太多此一舉了」「早一小時起床上班,天都還沒亮
,我才不要咧!」「覺得反而是中國要改吧?」「精神勝利法又一力作」(即時新聞中心
/綜合報導)
https://i.imgur.com/wIfzm8w.jpg

將台灣目前的時區改與日韓相同,您贊成嗎?資料照片
https://i.imgur.com/G8QCA0C.jpg

有網友發起「我國應調整時區至GMT+9」連署。翻攝自公共政策網路參與平台
https://goo.gl/evF3Yw
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 122.146.69.111
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1508390417.A.238.html
推
10/19 13:20, , 1F
10/19 13:20, 1F
噓
10/19 13:21, , 2F
10/19 13:21, 2F
噓
10/19 13:22, , 3F
10/19 13:22, 3F
推
10/19 13:22, , 4F
10/19 13:22, 4F
噓
10/19 13:22, , 5F
10/19 13:22, 5F
→
10/19 13:22, , 6F
10/19 13:22, 6F
→
10/19 13:22, , 7F
10/19 13:22, 7F
噓
10/19 13:22, , 8F
10/19 13:22, 8F
推
10/19 13:22, , 9F
10/19 13:22, 9F
→
10/19 13:23, , 10F
10/19 13:23, 10F
推
10/19 13:23, , 11F
10/19 13:23, 11F
→
10/19 13:23, , 12F
10/19 13:23, 12F
→
10/19 13:24, , 13F
10/19 13:24, 13F
→
10/19 13:24, , 14F
10/19 13:24, 14F
→
10/19 13:24, , 15F
10/19 13:24, 15F
→
10/19 13:25, , 16F
10/19 13:25, 16F
推
10/19 13:25, , 17F
10/19 13:25, 17F
推
10/19 13:25, , 18F
10/19 13:25, 18F
噓
10/19 13:25, , 19F
10/19 13:25, 19F
推
10/19 13:25, , 20F
10/19 13:25, 20F
→
10/19 13:26, , 21F
10/19 13:26, 21F
推
10/19 13:26, , 22F
10/19 13:26, 22F
→
10/19 13:26, , 23F
10/19 13:26, 23F
推
10/19 13:26, , 24F
10/19 13:26, 24F
推
10/19 13:27, , 25F
10/19 13:27, 25F
→
10/19 13:27, , 26F
10/19 13:27, 26F
推
10/19 13:27, , 27F
10/19 13:27, 27F
→
10/19 13:28, , 28F
10/19 13:28, 28F
→
10/19 13:29, , 29F
10/19 13:29, 29F
→
10/19 13:29, , 30F
10/19 13:29, 30F
→
10/19 13:29, , 31F
10/19 13:29, 31F
推
10/19 13:32, , 32F
10/19 13:32, 32F
推
10/19 13:33, , 33F
10/19 13:33, 33F
→
10/19 13:33, , 34F
10/19 13:33, 34F
推
10/19 13:33, , 35F
10/19 13:33, 35F
噓
10/19 13:35, , 36F
10/19 13:35, 36F
→
10/19 13:36, , 37F
10/19 13:36, 37F
→
10/19 13:36, , 38F
10/19 13:36, 38F
噓
10/19 13:37, , 39F
10/19 13:37, 39F
還有 25 則推文
噓
10/19 14:22, , 65F
10/19 14:22, 65F
→
10/19 14:23, , 66F
10/19 14:23, 66F
推
10/19 14:24, , 67F
10/19 14:24, 67F
→
10/19 14:24, , 68F
10/19 14:24, 68F
→
10/19 14:26, , 69F
10/19 14:26, 69F
推
10/19 14:26, , 70F
10/19 14:26, 70F
推
10/19 14:28, , 71F
10/19 14:28, 71F
噓
10/19 14:28, , 72F
10/19 14:28, 72F
→
10/19 14:28, , 73F
10/19 14:28, 73F
推
10/19 14:29, , 74F
10/19 14:29, 74F
噓
10/19 14:31, , 75F
10/19 14:31, 75F
推
10/19 14:31, , 76F
10/19 14:31, 76F
→
10/19 14:31, , 77F
10/19 14:31, 77F
推
10/19 14:32, , 78F
10/19 14:32, 78F
→
10/19 14:32, , 79F
10/19 14:32, 79F
→
10/19 14:32, , 80F
10/19 14:32, 80F
噓
10/19 14:34, , 81F
10/19 14:34, 81F
→
10/19 14:36, , 82F
10/19 14:36, 82F
推
10/19 14:40, , 83F
10/19 14:40, 83F
推
10/19 14:40, , 84F
10/19 14:40, 84F
推
10/19 14:43, , 85F
10/19 14:43, 85F
推
10/19 14:54, , 86F
10/19 14:54, 86F
推
10/19 14:55, , 87F
10/19 14:55, 87F
噓
10/19 15:01, , 88F
10/19 15:01, 88F
→
10/19 15:01, , 89F
10/19 15:01, 89F
→
10/19 15:02, , 90F
10/19 15:02, 90F
推
10/19 15:09, , 91F
10/19 15:09, 91F
推
10/19 15:18, , 92F
10/19 15:18, 92F
→
10/19 15:28, , 93F
10/19 15:28, 93F
→
10/19 15:29, , 94F
10/19 15:29, 94F
推
10/19 15:43, , 95F
10/19 15:43, 95F
→
10/19 16:27, , 96F
10/19 16:27, 96F
→
10/19 16:48, , 97F
10/19 16:48, 97F
推
10/19 16:57, , 98F
10/19 16:57, 98F
推
10/19 17:10, , 99F
10/19 17:10, 99F
噓
10/19 17:55, , 100F
10/19 17:55, 100F
→
10/19 17:55, , 101F
10/19 17:55, 101F
噓
10/19 19:05, , 102F
10/19 19:05, 102F
推
10/19 19:06, , 103F
10/19 19:06, 103F
噓
10/20 10:48, , 104F
10/20 10:48, 104F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 5 篇):