[問卦] 如果當初核四完成運轉,今天台灣會怎樣?消失
如果當初核四完成運轉,今天台灣會怎樣?
台灣核能50幾年來,因為核能而死的人數是零。
核能反應是在精密科學監控下的反應
如果今天有核四運轉
認列廢核四的損失3000多億以及營業損失6000多億
以及每年上百億燃料補充費
就這樣憑空燒掉的錢也都可以省下來
預算不再被排擠
台灣將有上兆經費用來產業轉型
能源穩定
台灣無論競爭力排名
學歷素質
人力便宜度
通通完勝南韓
台灣將產生磁吸效應
將投資南韓的企業以及資金都吸往台灣
台灣產業將反向挖角南韓人才
台灣各行各業資金多到滿出來
創意有舞台
創業有資金
子瑜也會留在台灣發展
如果當初核四完成運轉,今天台灣會怎樣?
-----
Sent from JPTT on my HUAWEI MHA-L29.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 219.84.220.77
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1494317087.A.0E7.html
→
05/09 16:05, , 1F
05/09 16:05, 1F
推
05/09 16:05, , 2F
05/09 16:05, 2F
推
05/09 16:05, , 3F
05/09 16:05, 3F
→
05/09 16:05, , 4F
05/09 16:05, 4F
推
05/09 16:05, , 5F
05/09 16:05, 5F
推
05/09 16:05, , 6F
05/09 16:05, 6F
→
05/09 16:05, , 7F
05/09 16:05, 7F
→
05/09 16:05, , 8F
05/09 16:05, 8F
推
05/09 16:05, , 9F
05/09 16:05, 9F
→
05/09 16:06, , 10F
05/09 16:06, 10F
→
05/09 16:06, , 11F
05/09 16:06, 11F
→
05/09 16:06, , 12F
05/09 16:06, 12F
推
05/09 16:08, , 13F
05/09 16:08, 13F
推
05/09 16:09, , 14F
05/09 16:09, 14F
→
05/09 16:09, , 15F
05/09 16:09, 15F
推
05/09 16:10, , 16F
05/09 16:10, 16F
→
05/09 16:10, , 17F
05/09 16:10, 17F
→
05/09 16:11, , 18F
05/09 16:11, 18F
推
05/09 16:11, , 19F
05/09 16:11, 19F
噓
05/09 16:12, , 20F
05/09 16:12, 20F
推
05/09 16:12, , 21F
05/09 16:12, 21F
推
05/09 16:12, , 22F
05/09 16:12, 22F
推
05/09 16:12, , 23F
05/09 16:12, 23F
推
05/09 16:14, , 24F
05/09 16:14, 24F
噓
05/09 16:15, , 25F
05/09 16:15, 25F
噓
05/09 16:15, , 26F
05/09 16:15, 26F
噓
05/09 16:17, , 27F
05/09 16:17, 27F
推
05/09 16:17, , 28F
05/09 16:17, 28F
→
05/09 16:19, , 29F
05/09 16:19, 29F
推
05/09 16:19, , 30F
05/09 16:19, 30F
噓
05/09 16:19, , 31F
05/09 16:19, 31F
噓
05/09 16:19, , 32F
05/09 16:19, 32F
噓
05/09 16:20, , 33F
05/09 16:20, 33F
推
05/09 16:20, , 34F
05/09 16:20, 34F
→
05/09 16:21, , 35F
05/09 16:21, 35F
推
05/09 16:21, , 36F
05/09 16:21, 36F
→
05/09 16:26, , 37F
05/09 16:26, 37F
→
05/09 16:26, , 38F
05/09 16:26, 38F
→
05/09 16:26, , 39F
05/09 16:26, 39F
還有 39 則推文
推
05/09 17:12, , 79F
05/09 17:12, 79F
→
05/09 17:17, , 80F
05/09 17:17, 80F
推
05/09 17:19, , 81F
05/09 17:19, 81F
噓
05/09 17:23, , 82F
05/09 17:23, 82F
推
05/09 17:24, , 83F
05/09 17:24, 83F
→
05/09 17:24, , 84F
05/09 17:24, 84F
→
05/09 17:24, , 85F
05/09 17:24, 85F
推
05/09 17:25, , 86F
05/09 17:25, 86F
→
05/09 17:35, , 87F
05/09 17:35, 87F
推
05/09 17:38, , 88F
05/09 17:38, 88F
推
05/09 17:38, , 89F
05/09 17:38, 89F
推
05/09 17:39, , 90F
05/09 17:39, 90F
推
05/09 17:49, , 91F
05/09 17:49, 91F
→
05/09 17:54, , 92F
05/09 17:54, 92F
推
05/09 18:02, , 93F
05/09 18:02, 93F
推
05/09 18:33, , 94F
05/09 18:33, 94F
推
05/09 18:34, , 95F
05/09 18:34, 95F
推
05/09 18:34, , 96F
05/09 18:34, 96F
推
05/09 18:38, , 97F
05/09 18:38, 97F
→
05/09 18:39, , 98F
05/09 18:39, 98F
→
05/09 18:39, , 99F
05/09 18:39, 99F
→
05/09 18:40, , 100F
05/09 18:40, 100F
→
05/09 18:40, , 101F
05/09 18:40, 101F
→
05/09 18:40, , 102F
05/09 18:40, 102F
→
05/09 18:41, , 103F
05/09 18:41, 103F
推
05/09 18:47, , 104F
05/09 18:47, 104F
推
05/09 18:52, , 105F
05/09 18:52, 105F
噓
05/09 18:57, , 106F
05/09 18:57, 106F
→
05/09 18:59, , 107F
05/09 18:59, 107F
推
05/09 18:59, , 108F
05/09 18:59, 108F
推
05/09 18:59, , 109F
05/09 18:59, 109F
→
05/09 18:59, , 110F
05/09 18:59, 110F
推
05/09 19:04, , 111F
05/09 19:04, 111F
推
05/09 19:06, , 112F
05/09 19:06, 112F
→
05/09 19:08, , 113F
05/09 19:08, 113F
→
05/09 19:11, , 114F
05/09 19:11, 114F
→
05/09 19:11, , 115F
05/09 19:11, 115F
→
05/09 19:11, , 116F
05/09 19:11, 116F
推
05/09 19:14, , 117F
05/09 19:14, 117F
噓
05/09 22:12, , 118F
05/09 22:12, 118F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 5 篇):