[閒聊] 為什麼比較少在討論古龍的角色的強度?已回收
雖然說和金庸比起來,古龍的知名度確實不那麼高
但我想除了知名度以外,應該還有其他可能的原因
來試著縮看看
一、作品太多,品質又參差不齊,全部讀完的人相對少
因而把角色全面比較的文章自然也少
二、打鬥著重於氛圍的描寫,生死或勝負抵定往往只有一招或筆下一句話
三、角色太游刃有餘,角色出場幾乎就是完全體,讀者很難摸透角色當下能做到的事情
像楚留香、陸小鳳這種角色很難看出他們能力的底線
縱然處在危機之中,好像也很難讓讀者替他們擔心
好吧還是要來點燃一點火,我覺得最強的是李尋歡,雖然命有夠差
但我也是屬於沒把作品全部讀完那派ㄉ
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 123.195.103.84
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1506174594.A.3C9.html
推
09/23 21:50, , 1F
09/23 21:50, 1F
→
09/23 21:51, , 2F
09/23 21:51, 2F
推
09/23 21:51, , 3F
09/23 21:51, 3F
推
09/23 21:52, , 4F
09/23 21:52, 4F
→
09/23 21:52, , 5F
09/23 21:52, 5F
推
09/23 21:52, , 6F
09/23 21:52, 6F
他只評比了很一小部分的作品裡的角色吧
推
09/23 21:52, , 7F
09/23 21:52, 7F
這不是幹話,這是古龍
推
09/23 21:54, , 8F
09/23 21:54, 8F
推
09/23 21:54, , 9F
09/23 21:54, 9F
→
09/23 21:55, , 10F
09/23 21:55, 10F
推
09/23 21:56, , 11F
09/23 21:56, 11F
推
09/23 21:57, , 12F
09/23 21:57, 12F
→
09/23 21:57, , 13F
09/23 21:57, 13F
西門吹雪一票,這時候必須引用外部資訊的潮指數系統來判斷
→
09/23 21:58, , 14F
09/23 21:58, 14F
推
09/23 21:59, , 15F
09/23 21:59, 15F
→
09/23 21:59, , 16F
09/23 21:59, 16F
推
09/23 22:00, , 17F
09/23 22:00, 17F
推
09/23 22:01, , 18F
09/23 22:01, 18F
但上官的作死程度太高了,葛萊芬多扣10分
※ 編輯: peepeepoopoo (123.195.103.84), 09/23/2017 22:07:21
推
09/23 22:02, , 19F
09/23 22:02, 19F
推
09/23 22:02, , 20F
09/23 22:02, 20F
推
09/23 22:03, , 21F
09/23 22:03, 21F
推
09/23 22:03, , 22F
09/23 22:03, 22F
推
09/23 22:03, , 23F
09/23 22:03, 23F
→
09/23 22:03, , 24F
09/23 22:03, 24F
→
09/23 22:03, , 25F
09/23 22:03, 25F
推
09/23 22:03, , 26F
09/23 22:03, 26F
推
09/23 22:04, , 27F
09/23 22:04, 27F
→
09/23 22:04, , 28F
09/23 22:04, 28F
推
09/23 22:04, , 29F
09/23 22:04, 29F
→
09/23 22:05, , 30F
09/23 22:05, 30F
推
09/23 22:05, , 31F
09/23 22:05, 31F
→
09/23 22:05, , 32F
09/23 22:05, 32F
→
09/23 22:05, , 33F
09/23 22:05, 33F
→
09/23 22:06, , 34F
09/23 22:06, 34F
→
09/23 22:07, , 35F
09/23 22:07, 35F
還有 94 則推文
還有 5 段內文
→
09/23 22:56, , 130F
09/23 22:56, 130F
→
09/23 22:56, , 131F
09/23 22:56, 131F
→
09/23 22:57, , 132F
09/23 22:57, 132F
→
09/23 22:57, , 133F
09/23 22:57, 133F
浣花洗劍錄結局也是最傻眼最囧那種,感覺主角贏的超不光采的
→
09/23 22:58, , 134F
09/23 22:58, 134F
→
09/23 22:59, , 135F
09/23 22:59, 135F
推
09/23 23:00, , 136F
09/23 23:00, 136F
→
09/23 23:00, , 137F
09/23 23:00, 137F
推
09/23 23:02, , 138F
09/23 23:02, 138F
推
09/23 23:08, , 139F
09/23 23:08, 139F
→
09/23 23:22, , 140F
09/23 23:22, 140F
→
09/23 23:23, , 141F
09/23 23:23, 141F
→
09/23 23:23, , 142F
09/23 23:23, 142F
→
09/23 23:27, , 143F
09/23 23:27, 143F
推
09/23 23:52, , 144F
09/23 23:52, 144F
推
09/23 23:54, , 145F
09/23 23:54, 145F
推
09/23 23:59, , 146F
09/23 23:59, 146F
→
09/23 23:59, , 147F
09/23 23:59, 147F
→
09/23 23:59, , 148F
09/23 23:59, 148F
→
09/23 23:59, , 149F
09/23 23:59, 149F
→
09/24 00:01, , 150F
09/24 00:01, 150F
→
09/24 00:01, , 151F
09/24 00:01, 151F
→
09/24 00:09, , 152F
09/24 00:09, 152F
→
09/24 00:10, , 153F
09/24 00:10, 153F
→
09/24 00:27, , 154F
09/24 00:27, 154F
→
09/24 00:27, , 155F
09/24 00:27, 155F
→
09/24 01:27, , 156F
09/24 01:27, 156F
推
09/24 01:33, , 157F
09/24 01:33, 157F
→
09/24 01:33, , 158F
09/24 01:33, 158F
推
09/24 01:34, , 159F
09/24 01:34, 159F
推
09/24 02:25, , 160F
09/24 02:25, 160F
→
09/24 02:27, , 161F
09/24 02:27, 161F
→
09/24 02:28, , 162F
09/24 02:28, 162F
→
09/24 04:56, , 163F
09/24 04:56, 163F
→
09/24 04:56, , 164F
09/24 04:56, 164F
推
09/24 07:21, , 165F
09/24 07:21, 165F
這裡看起來喜歡的人不少,沒人提古龍很差吧?
推
09/24 09:53, , 166F
09/24 09:53, 166F
※ 編輯: peepeepoopoo (123.195.103.84), 09/24/2017 13:11:51
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 7 篇):