[問題] 所以PM動畫還是以收視率做成敗嗎?已回收
如題
昨天快樂快樂雜誌的圖透露出的情報
PM日月動畫會跟繼往風格有更大的不同
除了小智畫風改變 好像還變成學園(後宮?)動畫了...
動畫XY撇開聯盟不談 大部分人認為是成功的
但如果真的是成功的 日月應該不用做這麼大幅度的變革來冒險吧?
所以可以解讀成動畫製作方因為XY收視率比BW還差而做出這樣的改變嗎?
難道網路上的人氣都是浮雲? 只有收視率才是真的嗎?
還是日月動畫跟聯盟結果一樣又是一個製作組隨心所欲(無視商業考量)的產物嗎?
有大大有不同的見解嗎?
--
星☆光☆迴☆路☆遮☆斷☆器
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 125.227.149.211
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1473731748.A.3D4.html
推
09/13 09:56, , 1F
09/13 09:56, 1F
推
09/13 09:59, , 2F
09/13 09:59, 2F
推
09/13 10:00, , 3F
09/13 10:00, 3F
→
09/13 10:01, , 4F
09/13 10:01, 4F
→
09/13 10:01, , 5F
09/13 10:01, 5F
推
09/13 10:01, , 6F
09/13 10:01, 6F
推
09/13 10:02, , 7F
09/13 10:02, 7F
→
09/13 10:03, , 8F
09/13 10:03, 8F
推
09/13 10:03, , 9F
09/13 10:03, 9F
→
09/13 10:04, , 10F
09/13 10:04, 10F
推
09/13 10:04, , 11F
09/13 10:04, 11F
推
09/13 10:04, , 12F
09/13 10:04, 12F
→
09/13 10:04, , 13F
09/13 10:04, 13F
→
09/13 10:05, , 14F
09/13 10:05, 14F
→
09/13 10:05, , 15F
09/13 10:05, 15F
→
09/13 10:06, , 16F
09/13 10:06, 16F
→
09/13 10:07, , 17F
09/13 10:07, 17F
→
09/13 10:07, , 18F
09/13 10:07, 18F
→
09/13 10:08, , 19F
09/13 10:08, 19F
→
09/13 10:09, , 20F
09/13 10:09, 20F
→
09/13 10:09, , 21F
09/13 10:09, 21F
推
09/13 10:11, , 22F
09/13 10:11, 22F
推
09/13 10:13, , 23F
09/13 10:13, 23F
→
09/13 10:13, , 24F
09/13 10:13, 24F
→
09/13 10:13, , 25F
09/13 10:13, 25F
推
09/13 10:13, , 26F
09/13 10:13, 26F
推
09/13 10:14, , 27F
09/13 10:14, 27F
推
09/13 10:14, , 28F
09/13 10:14, 28F
→
09/13 10:15, , 29F
09/13 10:15, 29F
→
09/13 10:15, , 30F
09/13 10:15, 30F
→
09/13 10:15, , 31F
09/13 10:15, 31F
推
09/13 10:16, , 32F
09/13 10:16, 32F
→
09/13 10:17, , 33F
09/13 10:17, 33F
→
09/13 10:19, , 34F
09/13 10:19, 34F
→
09/13 10:19, , 35F
09/13 10:19, 35F
推
09/13 10:20, , 36F
09/13 10:20, 36F
→
09/13 10:20, , 37F
09/13 10:20, 37F
推
09/13 10:21, , 38F
09/13 10:21, 38F
→
09/13 10:21, , 39F
09/13 10:21, 39F
→
09/13 10:21, , 40F
09/13 10:21, 40F
→
09/13 10:21, , 41F
09/13 10:21, 41F
→
09/13 10:21, , 42F
09/13 10:21, 42F
→
09/13 10:22, , 43F
09/13 10:22, 43F
→
09/13 10:23, , 44F
09/13 10:23, 44F
→
09/13 10:24, , 45F
09/13 10:24, 45F
→
09/13 10:31, , 46F
09/13 10:31, 46F
推
09/13 10:37, , 47F
09/13 10:37, 47F
→
09/13 10:41, , 48F
09/13 10:41, 48F
→
09/13 10:44, , 49F
09/13 10:44, 49F
→
09/13 10:45, , 50F
09/13 10:45, 50F
→
09/13 10:50, , 51F
09/13 10:50, 51F
→
09/13 10:50, , 52F
09/13 10:50, 52F
推
09/13 10:52, , 53F
09/13 10:52, 53F
→
09/13 10:52, , 54F
09/13 10:52, 54F
→
09/13 10:52, , 55F
09/13 10:52, 55F
→
09/13 10:53, , 56F
09/13 10:53, 56F
→
09/13 10:57, , 57F
09/13 10:57, 57F
→
09/13 10:59, , 58F
09/13 10:59, 58F
→
09/13 10:59, , 59F
09/13 10:59, 59F
→
09/13 10:59, , 60F
09/13 10:59, 60F
→
09/13 11:00, , 61F
09/13 11:00, 61F
→
09/13 11:00, , 62F
09/13 11:00, 62F
→
09/13 11:00, , 63F
09/13 11:00, 63F
推
09/13 11:02, , 64F
09/13 11:02, 64F
→
09/13 11:02, , 65F
09/13 11:02, 65F
推
09/13 11:12, , 66F
09/13 11:12, 66F
→
09/13 11:12, , 67F
09/13 11:12, 67F
推
09/13 11:18, , 68F
09/13 11:18, 68F
→
09/13 11:18, , 69F
09/13 11:18, 69F
→
09/13 11:18, , 70F
09/13 11:18, 70F
→
09/13 11:19, , 71F
09/13 11:19, 71F
→
09/13 11:19, , 72F
09/13 11:19, 72F
→
09/13 11:21, , 73F
09/13 11:21, 73F
→
09/13 11:21, , 74F
09/13 11:21, 74F
→
09/13 11:22, , 75F
09/13 11:22, 75F
→
09/13 11:22, , 76F
09/13 11:22, 76F
→
09/13 11:26, , 77F
09/13 11:26, 77F
→
09/13 11:27, , 78F
09/13 11:27, 78F
→
09/13 11:27, , 79F
09/13 11:27, 79F
→
09/13 11:27, , 80F
09/13 11:27, 80F
→
09/13 11:28, , 81F
09/13 11:28, 81F
→
09/13 11:31, , 82F
09/13 11:31, 82F
→
09/13 11:31, , 83F
09/13 11:31, 83F
→
09/13 11:31, , 84F
09/13 11:31, 84F
推
09/13 11:48, , 85F
09/13 11:48, 85F
→
09/13 12:06, , 86F
09/13 12:06, 86F
→
09/13 12:06, , 87F
09/13 12:06, 87F
推
09/13 12:42, , 88F
09/13 12:42, 88F
推
09/13 12:46, , 89F
09/13 12:46, 89F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):