Re: [閒聊] 哈利波特有麻瓜的知識怎麼不去搶把槍?已回收
甚麼LOW不LOW的問題前面已經講完了 我來護航一下其他部份
首先物理傷害對巫師到底有多少用處一直是個迷
哈利摔斷整隻手時 龐芮夫人就說過他一秒就能修好
被馬份踩斷鼻子時東施是用個復復修就搞定了
頭蓋骨被整個打爆 龐芮夫人還是一秒就補好了
第七集主角群一天到晚受重傷也是敷點白鮮液就沒事了
本作我印象中唯一死於物理傷害的只有多比被貝拉扔出的銀刀殺死的
不過我覺得巫師打造的武器應該也具有某種魔法力量
所以說要用槍殺死巫師必須是一槍打爆心臟或轟掉腦袋(我甚至懷疑這樣有沒有用)
那還不如練個鎖命咒比較方便
另一方面 作中常常出現閃避掉或格檔掉咒語的橋段
反應速度快到能對以光為媒介甚至根本沒有媒介傳遞的咒語做出動作
速度只有一兩馬赫的子彈打的到嗎? 魔杖輕點或輕揮一下就彈開了吧
不知道為什麼總是有人覺得用槍就會改變甚麼
有沒有想過槍怎麼可能會比魔杖好用啊?
魔杖會被繳械 槍也會啊 咒語會被彈開 子彈也會啊
要遠遠用槍狙殺人 用魔杖一樣也可以啊
更不用說你拿著槍的時候 別人用魔法攻擊你要怎麼反抗
只能說麻瓜跟巫師的戰鬥是完全不同層次的
管你有核彈還是百萬大軍 一個麻瓜驅逐咒就屌打你
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 182.234.38.26
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1466190170.A.87A.html
推
06/18 03:05, , 1F
06/18 03:05, 1F
那我會選速度更快 不用裝彈 打到腳踝也會死的鎖命咒
推
06/18 03:07, , 2F
06/18 03:07, 2F
推
06/18 03:10, , 3F
06/18 03:10, 3F
沒有目標啊 麻瓜只會看到此地危險之類的警告標語
更不用說所有電磁相關的科技都會被魔法磁場無效化
羅林似乎也不太重視一般物理外傷就是了....
→
06/18 03:11, , 4F
06/18 03:11, 4F
→
06/18 03:11, , 5F
06/18 03:11, 5F
不能把巫師當麻瓜看啊 羅琳就是把巫師設定成連光束都閃得開的怪物
→
06/18 03:14, , 6F
06/18 03:14, 6F
推
06/18 03:14, , 7F
06/18 03:14, 7F
※ 編輯: KevinCL (182.234.38.26), 06/18/2016 03:24:57
推
06/18 03:20, , 8F
06/18 03:20, 8F
推
06/18 03:21, , 9F
06/18 03:21, 9F
推
06/18 03:38, , 10F
06/18 03:38, 10F
→
06/18 03:39, , 11F
06/18 03:39, 11F
推
06/18 03:40, , 12F
06/18 03:40, 12F
→
06/18 03:40, , 13F
06/18 03:40, 13F
推
06/18 03:43, , 14F
06/18 03:43, 14F
→
06/18 03:43, , 15F
06/18 03:43, 15F
→
06/18 03:44, , 16F
06/18 03:44, 16F
推
06/18 03:46, , 17F
06/18 03:46, 17F
→
06/18 03:46, , 18F
06/18 03:46, 18F
推
06/18 03:51, , 19F
06/18 03:51, 19F
→
06/18 03:52, , 20F
06/18 03:52, 20F
推
06/18 04:18, , 21F
06/18 04:18, 21F
→
06/18 04:18, , 22F
06/18 04:18, 22F
推
06/18 04:19, , 23F
06/18 04:19, 23F
→
06/18 04:19, , 24F
06/18 04:19, 24F
→
06/18 04:19, , 25F
06/18 04:19, 25F
→
06/18 04:20, , 26F
06/18 04:20, 26F
推
06/18 04:21, , 27F
06/18 04:21, 27F
→
06/18 04:22, , 28F
06/18 04:22, 28F
→
06/18 04:23, , 29F
06/18 04:23, 29F
→
06/18 04:23, , 30F
06/18 04:23, 30F
→
06/18 04:24, , 31F
06/18 04:24, 31F
→
06/18 04:25, , 32F
06/18 04:25, 32F
→
06/18 04:25, , 33F
06/18 04:25, 33F
推
06/18 04:28, , 34F
06/18 04:28, 34F
→
06/18 04:29, , 35F
06/18 04:29, 35F
還有 96 則推文
推
06/18 09:20, , 132F
06/18 09:20, 132F
推
06/18 09:22, , 133F
06/18 09:22, 133F
→
06/18 09:23, , 134F
06/18 09:23, 134F
→
06/18 09:24, , 135F
06/18 09:24, 135F
→
06/18 09:25, , 136F
06/18 09:25, 136F
推
06/18 09:26, , 137F
06/18 09:26, 137F
→
06/18 09:26, , 138F
06/18 09:26, 138F
推
06/18 09:33, , 139F
06/18 09:33, 139F
→
06/18 09:33, , 140F
06/18 09:33, 140F
推
06/18 09:36, , 141F
06/18 09:36, 141F
推
06/18 10:12, , 142F
06/18 10:12, 142F
→
06/18 10:26, , 143F
06/18 10:26, 143F
推
06/18 10:38, , 144F
06/18 10:38, 144F
推
06/18 10:39, , 145F
06/18 10:39, 145F
→
06/18 10:39, , 146F
06/18 10:39, 146F
→
06/18 10:39, , 147F
06/18 10:39, 147F
→
06/18 10:40, , 148F
06/18 10:40, 148F
推
06/18 10:42, , 149F
06/18 10:42, 149F
→
06/18 10:42, , 150F
06/18 10:42, 150F
推
06/18 10:50, , 151F
06/18 10:50, 151F
→
06/18 10:56, , 152F
06/18 10:56, 152F
→
06/18 10:56, , 153F
06/18 10:56, 153F
→
06/18 10:56, , 154F
06/18 10:56, 154F
→
06/18 10:58, , 155F
06/18 10:58, 155F
推
06/18 11:09, , 156F
06/18 11:09, 156F
→
06/18 11:10, , 157F
06/18 11:10, 157F
→
06/18 11:10, , 158F
06/18 11:10, 158F
→
06/18 11:11, , 159F
06/18 11:11, 159F
推
06/18 11:13, , 160F
06/18 11:13, 160F
→
06/18 11:15, , 161F
06/18 11:15, 161F
→
06/18 11:16, , 162F
06/18 11:16, 162F
推
06/18 11:28, , 163F
06/18 11:28, 163F
→
06/18 11:28, , 164F
06/18 11:28, 164F
→
06/18 11:50, , 165F
06/18 11:50, 165F
推
06/18 12:10, , 166F
06/18 12:10, 166F
→
06/18 12:10, , 167F
06/18 12:10, 167F
推
06/18 13:19, , 168F
06/18 13:19, 168F
→
06/18 13:19, , 169F
06/18 13:19, 169F
推
06/18 13:35, , 170F
06/18 13:35, 170F
噓
08/02 22:39, , 171F
08/02 22:39, 171F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 7 之 17 篇):