Re: [閒聊] Fate/Stay Night 強度值得認真嗎(雷)消失
※ 引述《syoutsuki77 (嘯風弄月)》之銘言:
: Saber最初那劍夠快夠迅速但可惜沒有全魔力爆發下去
: 之前一直隱藏身份然後才突然秀出絕技
: 接受魔術buff
: 近身距離
: 長劍不適合應對蛇拳
: Saber被擊中腦幹
: 這些都是葛木獲勝的要素
: 一個個疊加起來後變得很恐怖
因為下班後很閒, 我重新去跑了這一段
好啦, 簡單的說
1.) Saber有意識到近身不利, 所以有退開到自己可以發揮劍的一足一劍的距離,
但是被葛木正面擊中還是很痛 => 距離都拉開到可以揮劍還是打不贏
2.) Saber被擊中腦幹後還是算清醒 => 所以一開始被擊中腦幹的影響沒想像中大
3.) 葛木可以用膝蓋跟手肘把Saber高速砍下的劍夾住,
連Saber都說不可思議 => 葛木體術IMBA
4.) 葛木拋開Saber的動作比saber砍葛木的動作速度要快 => 葛木體術IMBA
5.) 葛木出拳的角度很怪, Saber擋不住, 是靠直覺才躲過致命一擊 => 葛木體術IMBA
6.) C子的BUFF打不穿Saber的盔甲, 但是打到肉是可以削下肉的 => BUFF有差但不到IMBA
7.) 劇情有提到, 葛木的招式雖然怪異, 但是還是有招可破, 所以只有初次有效
真正的戰法以無形為究極 => 就像獨孤九劍的無招勝有招, 有招看穿弱點還是可以破
那土狼怎麼擋下葛木的呢?
1.) 沒有什麼描寫; 沒有說到雙劍適合近身防守, 就莫名其妙的擋了30拳 => 土狼IMBA
2.) 葛木看到土狼可以投影劍覺得很神奇, 所以猶豫了一下 => 主角威能
好啦 結論是 : 蘑菇愛怎麼寫就怎麼寫好了, 不要跟他認真....
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 220.137.143.160
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1418645687.A.D6A.html
→
12/15 20:18, , 1F
12/15 20:18, 1F
推
12/15 20:19, , 2F
12/15 20:19, 2F
→
12/15 20:19, , 3F
12/15 20:19, 3F
→
12/15 20:20, , 4F
12/15 20:20, 4F
→
12/15 20:20, , 5F
12/15 20:20, 5F
→
12/15 20:22, , 6F
12/15 20:22, 6F
→
12/15 20:22, , 7F
12/15 20:22, 7F
→
12/15 20:22, , 8F
12/15 20:22, 8F
→
12/15 20:23, , 9F
12/15 20:23, 9F
→
12/15 20:23, , 10F
12/15 20:23, 10F
推
12/15 20:32, , 11F
12/15 20:32, 11F
→
12/15 20:32, , 12F
12/15 20:32, 12F
→
12/15 20:34, , 13F
12/15 20:34, 13F
→
12/15 20:38, , 14F
12/15 20:38, 14F
→
12/15 20:40, , 15F
12/15 20:40, 15F
→
12/15 20:41, , 16F
12/15 20:41, 16F
推
12/15 20:41, , 17F
12/15 20:41, 17F
→
12/15 20:41, , 18F
12/15 20:41, 18F
推
12/15 20:41, , 19F
12/15 20:41, 19F
→
12/15 20:42, , 20F
12/15 20:42, 20F
→
12/15 20:44, , 21F
12/15 20:44, 21F
→
12/15 20:46, , 22F
12/15 20:46, 22F
推
12/15 20:54, , 23F
12/15 20:54, 23F
推
12/15 20:56, , 24F
12/15 20:56, 24F
→
12/15 20:57, , 25F
12/15 20:57, 25F
推
12/15 20:59, , 26F
12/15 20:59, 26F
→
12/15 21:25, , 27F
12/15 21:25, 27F
→
12/15 21:27, , 28F
12/15 21:27, 28F
推
12/15 21:27, , 29F
12/15 21:27, 29F
→
12/15 21:28, , 30F
12/15 21:28, 30F
→
12/15 21:29, , 31F
12/15 21:29, 31F
→
12/15 21:31, , 32F
12/15 21:31, 32F
→
12/15 21:31, , 33F
12/15 21:31, 33F
推
12/15 21:37, , 34F
12/15 21:37, 34F
→
12/15 21:38, , 35F
12/15 21:38, 35F
推
12/15 21:41, , 36F
12/15 21:41, 36F
→
12/15 21:41, , 37F
12/15 21:41, 37F
→
12/15 21:41, , 38F
12/15 21:41, 38F
推
12/15 21:50, , 39F
12/15 21:50, 39F
還有 56 則推文
→
12/15 22:25, , 96F
12/15 22:25, 96F
→
12/15 22:25, , 97F
12/15 22:25, 97F
→
12/15 22:26, , 98F
12/15 22:26, 98F
→
12/15 22:26, , 99F
12/15 22:26, 99F
→
12/15 22:26, , 100F
12/15 22:26, 100F
→
12/15 22:26, , 101F
12/15 22:26, 101F
→
12/15 22:27, , 102F
12/15 22:27, 102F
→
12/15 22:27, , 103F
12/15 22:27, 103F
→
12/15 22:27, , 104F
12/15 22:27, 104F
→
12/15 22:27, , 105F
12/15 22:27, 105F
→
12/15 22:28, , 106F
12/15 22:28, 106F
推
12/15 22:28, , 107F
12/15 22:28, 107F
→
12/15 22:28, , 108F
12/15 22:28, 108F
→
12/15 22:28, , 109F
12/15 22:28, 109F
→
12/15 22:29, , 110F
12/15 22:29, 110F
→
12/15 22:30, , 111F
12/15 22:30, 111F
→
12/15 22:30, , 112F
12/15 22:30, 112F
→
12/15 22:30, , 113F
12/15 22:30, 113F
→
12/15 22:30, , 114F
12/15 22:30, 114F
→
12/15 22:31, , 115F
12/15 22:31, 115F
→
12/15 22:31, , 116F
12/15 22:31, 116F
推
12/15 22:32, , 117F
12/15 22:32, 117F
→
12/15 22:32, , 118F
12/15 22:32, 118F
→
12/15 22:34, , 119F
12/15 22:34, 119F
推
12/15 22:34, , 120F
12/15 22:34, 120F
→
12/15 22:35, , 121F
12/15 22:35, 121F
→
12/15 22:35, , 122F
12/15 22:35, 122F
→
12/15 22:35, , 123F
12/15 22:35, 123F
→
12/15 22:35, , 124F
12/15 22:35, 124F
→
12/15 22:36, , 125F
12/15 22:36, 125F
推
12/15 22:36, , 126F
12/15 22:36, 126F
→
12/15 22:37, , 127F
12/15 22:37, 127F
→
12/15 22:37, , 128F
12/15 22:37, 128F
→
12/15 22:37, , 129F
12/15 22:37, 129F
→
12/15 22:37, , 130F
12/15 22:37, 130F
→
12/15 22:37, , 131F
12/15 22:37, 131F
→
12/15 22:37, , 132F
12/15 22:37, 132F
→
12/15 22:38, , 133F
12/15 22:38, 133F
→
12/15 22:38, , 134F
12/15 22:38, 134F
推
12/16 16:52, , 135F
12/16 16:52, 135F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 11 之 24 篇):