[閒聊] Fate/Stay Night 強度值得認真嗎(雷)消失
Saber 跟 Lancer 打的不相上下
外人看應該跟飲茶視點差不多 根本看不太到
結果只會投影跟強化的士郎
連個魔術都沒發動就能閃掉好幾次
會暗殺術的普通人類上Buff後幹掉Rider
最新一集顯示其力量跟速度還能爆打Saber
差點把她掐到漏尿
只不過投影了干將莫邪的士郎
能跟葛木暫時打平
就算設定上說可以一起複製劍術好了
士郎的身體又沒強化過
被Buff過的葛木明顯那種力量可以一拳把人打穿
結果出拳還可以被士郎跟他的投影武器擋下來
被Buff過的精通武術的人類>=英靈>=士郎
雖然Fate/Zero是後寫的
但反而讓Fate/Zero的認真嚴肅像笑話一樣
每個都比一個高中生還不如
明顯就設定歸設定
但是其實表現他說了算啊
為什麼有些人可以把Fate的強度討論的像在講什麼學術一樣(′‧ω‧‵)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 180.58.212.26
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1418563863.A.2C0.html
→
12/14 21:32, , 1F
12/14 21:32, 1F
推
12/14 21:32, , 2F
12/14 21:32, 2F
→
12/14 21:32, , 3F
12/14 21:32, 3F
→
12/14 21:32, , 4F
12/14 21:32, 4F
推
12/14 21:33, , 5F
12/14 21:33, 5F
→
12/14 21:33, , 6F
12/14 21:33, 6F
※ 編輯: justice00s (180.58.212.26), 12/14/2014 21:34:13
推
12/14 21:33, , 7F
12/14 21:33, 7F
→
12/14 21:34, , 8F
12/14 21:34, 8F
→
12/14 21:35, , 9F
12/14 21:35, 9F
※ 編輯: justice00s (180.58.212.26), 12/14/2014 21:36:42
推
12/14 21:37, , 10F
12/14 21:37, 10F
→
12/14 21:38, , 11F
12/14 21:38, 11F
→
12/14 21:38, , 12F
12/14 21:38, 12F
推
12/14 21:38, , 13F
12/14 21:38, 13F
→
12/14 21:40, , 14F
12/14 21:40, 14F
推
12/14 21:41, , 15F
12/14 21:41, 15F
推
12/14 21:41, , 16F
12/14 21:41, 16F
推
12/14 21:42, , 17F
12/14 21:42, 17F
→
12/14 21:43, , 18F
12/14 21:43, 18F
推
12/14 21:43, , 19F
12/14 21:43, 19F
推
12/14 21:43, , 20F
12/14 21:43, 20F
→
12/14 21:43, , 21F
12/14 21:43, 21F
→
12/14 21:44, , 22F
12/14 21:44, 22F
推
12/14 21:44, , 23F
12/14 21:44, 23F
→
12/14 21:44, , 24F
12/14 21:44, 24F
→
12/14 21:45, , 25F
12/14 21:45, 25F
推
12/14 21:45, , 26F
12/14 21:45, 26F
推
12/14 21:46, , 27F
12/14 21:46, 27F
→
12/14 21:46, , 28F
12/14 21:46, 28F
推
12/14 21:47, , 29F
12/14 21:47, 29F
→
12/14 21:48, , 30F
12/14 21:48, 30F
推
12/14 21:48, , 31F
12/14 21:48, 31F
推
12/14 21:51, , 32F
12/14 21:51, 32F
推
12/14 21:52, , 33F
12/14 21:52, 33F
推
12/14 21:52, , 34F
12/14 21:52, 34F
推
12/14 21:54, , 35F
12/14 21:54, 35F
推
12/14 21:58, , 36F
12/14 21:58, 36F
發個文就能干涉別人討論
那這文章肯定是上了什麼魔術
→
12/14 22:02, , 37F
12/14 22:02, 37F
※ 編輯: justice00s (180.58.212.26), 12/14/2014 22:08:10
推
12/14 22:10, , 38F
12/14 22:10, 38F
→
12/14 22:11, , 39F
12/14 22:11, 39F
→
12/14 22:19, , 40F
12/14 22:19, 40F
推
12/14 22:23, , 41F
12/14 22:23, 41F
推
12/14 22:34, , 42F
12/14 22:34, 42F
→
12/14 22:53, , 43F
12/14 22:53, 43F
推
12/14 23:02, , 44F
12/14 23:02, 44F
→
12/14 23:28, , 45F
12/14 23:28, 45F
→
12/14 23:28, , 46F
12/14 23:28, 46F
推
12/15 08:22, , 47F
12/15 08:22, 47F
→
12/15 14:58, , 48F
12/15 14:58, 48F
推
12/15 21:21, , 49F
12/15 21:21, 49F
→
12/15 21:21, , 50F
12/15 21:21, 50F
推
12/16 03:03, , 51F
12/16 03:03, 51F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 24 篇):