Re: [問題] 九下為什麼不觸擊已回收
※ 引述《JetYen ( )》之銘言:
: 九下沒人出局二壘有人
: 基本功短打讓跑者上三壘不是很正常的戰術嗎?
: 荷蘭隊昨天不是也都做了短打戰術
: 一出局三壘有人壓力就一整個在對方身上
: 就算是「無生還」丟 只要一個手滑 就掰了
: 到底我們教練團這次比賽有執行過戰術嗎?
不知道有沒有人提到
或許也有不少版友在推文提過了
我自己感覺
不管那時候九下的情況是怎樣
就算沒人出局三壘有人
就算投手不是吳昇桓
都會讓林智勝用力打下去
畢竟是他最後一次國際賽了
前面又領了4K
絕對不可能讓林智勝用觸擊當他國際賽的最後一個打席的
也不好讓林智勝就這樣被代打打掉
反正也是一場無關晉級與否的比賽了
輸贏其實重要性不會大過於這是大師兄的最後一場國際賽
我想這應該是KAKU的意思吧
就讓林智勝用力享受最後一個國際賽的打席吧
特別又是能跟MLB打者用力對決的打席
我相信大師兄他自己也不會想用短打的來對決的
唉真的很感嘆啊
鋒哥之後
林智勝也要卸下中華隊球衣了
唉真的真的很傷感啊...
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 180.217.229.213
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1489081362.A.CC1.html
推
03/10 01:43, , 1F
03/10 01:43, 1F
→
03/10 01:43, , 2F
03/10 01:43, 2F
推
03/10 01:44, , 3F
03/10 01:44, 3F
推
03/10 01:44, , 4F
03/10 01:44, 4F
※ 編輯: btm978952 (180.217.229.213), 03/10/2017 01:46:33
→
03/10 01:44, , 5F
03/10 01:44, 5F
推
03/10 01:44, , 6F
03/10 01:44, 6F
→
03/10 01:44, , 7F
03/10 01:44, 7F
推
03/10 01:44, , 8F
03/10 01:44, 8F
推
03/10 01:44, , 9F
03/10 01:44, 9F
推
03/10 01:45, , 10F
03/10 01:45, 10F
→
03/10 01:46, , 11F
03/10 01:46, 11F
推
03/10 01:46, , 12F
03/10 01:46, 12F
對荷蘭應該是單純想要求勝
跟自己最後一次國際賽打席
意義應該不太一樣
但我不是大師兄我也不能確實揣測他的想法
→
03/10 01:47, , 13F
03/10 01:47, 13F
※ 編輯: btm978952 (180.217.229.213), 03/10/2017 01:48:42
推
03/10 01:50, , 14F
03/10 01:50, 14F
推
03/10 01:52, , 15F
03/10 01:52, 15F
推
03/10 01:52, , 16F
03/10 01:52, 16F
→
03/10 01:52, , 17F
03/10 01:52, 17F
推
03/10 01:54, , 18F
03/10 01:54, 18F
→
03/10 01:55, , 19F
03/10 01:55, 19F
→
03/10 01:57, , 20F
03/10 01:57, 20F
推
03/10 01:58, , 21F
03/10 01:58, 21F
→
03/10 01:58, , 22F
03/10 01:58, 22F
推
03/10 02:00, , 23F
03/10 02:00, 23F
推
03/10 02:00, , 24F
03/10 02:00, 24F
→
03/10 02:01, , 25F
03/10 02:01, 25F
→
03/10 02:04, , 26F
03/10 02:04, 26F
推
03/10 02:07, , 27F
03/10 02:07, 27F
推
03/10 02:15, , 28F
03/10 02:15, 28F
噓
03/10 02:31, , 29F
03/10 02:31, 29F
→
03/10 02:33, , 30F
03/10 02:33, 30F
→
03/10 02:34, , 31F
03/10 02:34, 31F
→
03/10 02:35, , 32F
03/10 02:35, 32F
推
03/10 02:54, , 33F
03/10 02:54, 33F
→
03/10 02:56, , 34F
03/10 02:56, 34F
→
03/10 03:31, , 35F
03/10 03:31, 35F
→
03/10 03:31, , 36F
03/10 03:31, 36F
推
03/10 03:52, , 37F
03/10 03:52, 37F
推
03/10 04:48, , 38F
03/10 04:48, 38F
→
03/10 04:48, , 39F
03/10 04:48, 39F
→
03/10 05:44, , 40F
03/10 05:44, 40F
→
03/10 05:44, , 41F
03/10 05:44, 41F
→
03/10 05:46, , 42F
03/10 05:46, 42F
→
03/10 05:46, , 43F
03/10 05:46, 43F
推
03/10 07:10, , 44F
03/10 07:10, 44F
→
03/10 07:10, , 45F
03/10 07:10, 45F
→
03/10 07:10, , 46F
03/10 07:10, 46F
→
03/10 07:10, , 47F
03/10 07:10, 47F
→
03/10 07:14, , 48F
03/10 07:14, 48F
噓
03/10 07:29, , 49F
03/10 07:29, 49F
推
03/10 07:42, , 50F
03/10 07:42, 50F
→
03/10 07:56, , 51F
03/10 07:56, 51F
→
03/10 07:56, , 52F
03/10 07:56, 52F
推
03/10 08:07, , 53F
03/10 08:07, 53F
推
03/10 08:57, , 54F
03/10 08:57, 54F
→
03/10 08:58, , 55F
03/10 08:58, 55F
→
03/10 08:58, , 56F
03/10 08:58, 56F
噓
03/10 09:35, , 57F
03/10 09:35, 57F
推
03/10 09:45, , 58F
03/10 09:45, 58F
噓
03/10 09:47, , 59F
03/10 09:47, 59F
噓
03/10 09:47, , 60F
03/10 09:47, 60F
噓
03/10 10:05, , 61F
03/10 10:05, 61F
噓
03/10 11:26, , 62F
03/10 11:26, 62F
→
03/10 11:27, , 63F
03/10 11:27, 63F
噓
03/10 11:32, , 64F
03/10 11:32, 64F
噓
03/10 11:42, , 65F
03/10 11:42, 65F
噓
03/10 11:42, , 66F
03/10 11:42, 66F
噓
03/10 11:42, , 67F
03/10 11:42, 67F
噓
03/10 11:42, , 68F
03/10 11:42, 68F
噓
03/10 12:26, , 69F
03/10 12:26, 69F
噓
03/10 12:41, , 70F
03/10 12:41, 70F
→
03/10 12:56, , 71F
03/10 12:56, 71F
噓
03/10 15:01, , 72F
03/10 15:01, 72F
→
03/10 15:01, , 73F
03/10 15:01, 73F
噓
03/10 18:00, , 74F
03/10 18:00, 74F
→
03/10 18:41, , 75F
03/10 18:41, 75F
→
03/10 18:41, , 76F
03/10 18:41, 76F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
問題
112
288
以下文章回應了本文:
問題
51
370
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 55 篇):
問題
112
288
問題
51
370
問題
42
133
問題
40
91
問題
17
44
問題
136
691
問題
36
111
問題
77
343