作者查詢 / uka123ily
作者 uka123ily 在 PTT [ Master_D ] 看板的留言(推文), 共1225則
限定看板:Master_D
看板排序:
全部gay8145Christianity6532PublicIssue3488GUNDAM2857Gossiping2595AfterPhD1637NTU1457W-Philosophy1328Master_D1225SENIORHIGH1142Education1139Policy1130PhD494TKU_Talk432LGBT_SEX426Tokusatsu421SRW316L_BoyMeetsGi268graduate204lesbian201textbook174MAC173IA169HumService152Teacher151MH148marriage127C_Chat121L_TalkandCha106Espannol103MobileComm75CCU_talk74Catholic61Channel_V59GossipPicket51medstudent47Ancient38About_Life36J-PopStation36JesusLove35feminine_sex30Falcom29SYSOP28C_ChatBM27Feminism27NCCU09_PHILO27Brethren26HSNU_114226movie26Buddhism25DragonQuest25FinalFantasy25SHENA-RINGO25haiku23Aviation22creditcard22iOS22SW_Job22transgender22Confucianism21FLAT_CLUB21NDS21NSwitch21TKU_CME96B19FJU18iPod18Seiya17DIGIMON16media-chaos15PSP-PSV15Sandy14EqualRights13CrossStrait12Macross12Militarylife12NCCU08_Ethno12nCoV201912sex12bi-sexual11BraveSaga11LAW11GreenParty10Marxism10RESIT10Sociology10TO-LesQu10ck-talk9model9PUBLICISS_PT9AU_Talk8KMT8LatinAmerica8PCSH91_3058pet8Salary8study8AC_In7AdvEduUK7book7cat7CSMU-CM-OP7KOU7medache7MEI-CHYI7SuperStarAve7Utada7Violation7Asexual6digitalk6HatePolitics6Health_Life6L_HappyLivin6LoL6TKU-Strategy6BookService5CSMU-MED975Ecophilia5JapanMovie5joke5junji-ITO5MCU_Talk5NCCU5NCCU08_HISTO5ONE_PIECE5popmusic5PuzzleDragon5studyteacher5WeiLi-geo5CKKC3132334CMU_CM444D_Fin_Law_924EarthQuake264EarthQuake434EUREKA4Lawyer4learnyf4Monotheism4NHU_Talk4NSYSU_EE95-14Nurse4pighead4RIPE_gender4SCU_Talk4scu_transfer4Suckcomic4TamShui4Aboriginal3AGEC993Bank_Service3CHU3ck59th3063DPP3Examination3HSNU_11123HSNU_8203Japandrama3kochikame3NCCU09_MAENG3NCCU_SEED3NTNU-HISBK3PttHistory3rent-exp3studyabroad3THU_BA20003THU_Talk3Trans_Study3AboutBoards2Anti-ramp2ChildrensDay2cksh85th3012CSMU-MED932DirectSales2dlsh-7th-3032Drama2Employee2FTHS-1582FuMouDiscuss2Google2Joi2MRT2NCCU_CCSH2NewYork2Nintendo2NTUGIPO_PNSL2NTUmed002NUK_AC982Olympics_ISG2PCSH_talk2Physics2psychedelico2Slayers2tattoo_ring2TNFSH98th2Tour-Manager2Transformers2TYSH50-3032WuLing46-3172AnimMovie1ArakawaCow1ASHS-93-li1Atheism1Bio-Job1Biology1Buddha1Cancer1CCU-GIE981Certificate1CFP1Cheer1CHING1civic_life1ck58th3111cksh79th011Cobras1CODE_GEASS1Conan1CPU_7711CS_TEACHER1CTSH97EXP1DiscoveryNGC1DistantLove1documentary1Doraemon1Drum1ESP1Evangelion1Finance1FineArt1FJU-ACCR941FJU-Stat95A1Folklore1GarbageCan1Gintama1GONZO1H-GAME1HarukiMuraka1HCSH_10th3121HCU1Holland1HSNU_10371HSNU_11461humanity1japanavgirls1JP_Entertain1juniorhigh1kawaii1Kids_Sucker1KingdomHuang1Kitty_Sanrio1kodomo1Kojima1KS93-3161KS94-3021KS94-3181KS95-3141KS96-3141KS98-3021LadyGaga1LightNovel1Lo-Sheng1London1LTK1MacShop1marvel1MetalGear1mknoheya1mobile-game1NCCU01_DIP1NCCU07_Ghis1NCCU_SSSH1NCHU-AE981NCHU-CE-SB1NCHUS1NetRumor1NKFUST1NTOU-MME-99B1NTOUEE981NTUOCGeo1NTUT_IPET4951NYUST98_FING1Ocean1Oceanography1Odoko-juku1P2PSoftWare1Patent1PCCU_Talk1PCman1PHS1PlayStation1PoliceRadio1PoliticLaw1politics1Pride1PT-961PublicAffair1PublicServan1Publish1Queer_drama1QueerHabit1Reptile1Rockman1Salesperson1San-Ying1Scout1SetMeUp1SFFamily1Shima-Kosaku1SHU-Gender951single1SK_SD_PL1SlamDunk1So-Edition1Sorry_Youth1SoulEater1SpongeBob1SSSH-16th-Fk1TaichungBun1Tainan1Taitung1TAS1TCFSH67TH101Tennis1Terry1TFSHS65th3131TFSHS65th3151TFSHS65th3201TFSHS67th3091TFSHS68th3021THEBACKHORN1THULAW1TNNUA-MUSEUM1TORIKO1TryingTimes1TSU1TW-language1UglyClub1USC1vetbasket1Vocaloid1WesternMusic1YMSC_94_3191Yup01-031Yup03-041Yup99-081YZU_CN99A1YZU_MBA971Z-Chen1ZenKwun1Zombie1<< 收起看板(349)
3F推:等退休潮 大概也要五到十年後吧...04/30 12:51
4F→:而且還要看領域 只能說自己加油吧04/30 12:52
12F推:我覺得他這樣回答很得體,反而你是強人所難03/21 13:59
22F推:任何時間都可以預習沒錯,但你這麼趕就很難這樣主張03/21 15:57
23F→:而且少個人又如何03/21 15:57
106F推:等他不行就會說了,說不訂他喜歡這種參與感03/22 10:39
24F推:G大應該是誤解,這無關領域之別03/19 00:57
25F→:引用是引用,參照不等於引用,這個事主就錯很大03/19 00:57
26F→:參考參照,這代表你發現有人有類似言論不等於引用03/19 00:59
27F→:看來很多人都以為有標就可以,這根本錯很大03/19 01:00
28F→:問題似乎不是單純沒引號或縮排的問題03/19 01:01
7F→:很多人其實有意無意都在抄襲。03/04 02:00
8F→:不過通常會被這樣撤銷應該是抄的很嚴重。03/04 02:01
11F推:有交代清楚並且符合引用的規範就不是抄襲03/04 01:56
12F→:至於新變數怎麼出現跟是不是抄襲無關03/04 01:56
4F→:沒有確實引用,即便已經修改變數,一樣可能構成抄襲。03/04 01:57
5F→:若別人不知道你的方法架構怎麼出現,就可能是抄襲。03/04 01:58
4F推:也是得區分是創見或者亂講。02/19 22:28
3F推:主要是考試範圍不同,代表測的東西也不同了02/16 21:47
4F→:你應該是同樣範圍來出題做前測後側。02/16 21:48
8F推:用兩次段考成績,代表你只有後測,前測假設為002/16 22:50
9F→:這就好像你拿英文成績去比國文成績02/16 22:51
13F推:有可能更不好嘛?XD02/17 00:07
14F→:我覺得頂多問題會是因為先考過所以知道該怎麼學的問題02/17 00:08
15F→:進步可能不是來自於學習,而是因為這種作弊。02/17 00:08
16F→:通常考量這樣的話就會分成兩組,而不是搞成前後測。02/17 00:09
17F→:教育相關我不太清楚,你可能要找其他文獻怎麼設計實驗。02/17 00:10
18F→:也許有什麼問題是我們沒有發現的。02/17 00:10
4F推:叫他去學校拿吧,通常學校有買吧02/16 01:27
5F推:科法之類的在職專班應該有喔XD02/15 15:02