作者查詢 / trausing
作者 trausing 在 PTT [ PttLifeLaw ] 看板的留言(推文), 共242則
限定看板:PttLifeLaw
看板排序:
全部book652PttLifeLaw242LAW135juniorhigh94FinalFantasy80Physics65medstudent61Transfer55WhiteCat50WrawlStars50Beauty45Romances37W-Philosophy34study31TOEFL_iBT29CATCH27Blog26SENIORHIGH24feminine_sex22LoL22MuscleBeach22HBL20PSY17Little-Games16MAC16NTU_trans16Patent16Dance_Sport15GO15trans_math15Univ_BRDance15Boxing14Boy-Girl12EZsoft12Gossiping12iOS12HsinPu11Trace11drawing10Psychiatry10Cognitive9NIHONGO9PresidentLi9TransPhys9TW-language9Anti-ramp8ChineseMed8historia8MP3-player8Oversea_Job8piano8Publish8TransLaw8VISA8Google7License7movie7uni-talk7Fiction6ask-why5Christianity5hardware5Lineage5MAJOR5Road_Running5Windows5Aviation4biker4GraduateCram4LA4LightNovel4Lottery4Tainan4watch4wretch4AntiVirus3C_Chat3graduate3HCHS_ALUMNI3HCSHch13_3113NCCU3NCCU09_PHILO3prozac3studyabroad3Taipeiman3WorldCup3Android2CCU-CHEMICAL2CFP2ck61st3092cksh85th3172clmusic2CYCU_ICE90AB2dictionary2Examination2GVO2HCHS543022HSNU_11422JapanMovie2KS96-3082Language2learnyf2Marxism2Network2PhD2PlayBaseball2Python2SSSH-16th3092SSSH-16th3132THU-HIS972TigerBlue2Browsers1CareerPlan1CCSH_92_3161China_Travel1ck59th3061cksh83rd3021cksh83rd3141cksh84th3021cksh84th3101cksh85th3201ckshga80th1CPU_IM7311DaZhi6thH3021Delivery1Digitalhome1e-coupon1HarukiMuraka1hikarugo1IME1Instrument1JapanStudy1KenShin1LadyGaga1mknoheya1money1NDHU-Ch991Nethood1NTNUGO1NTU-Exam1NTUMUN1NUK_EE100A1ONLINE1PC26th3181PCSH96_3051rent-exp1RESIT1share1Steam1SummerCourse1sungshan1Supermission1t-management1Wanhua1<< 收起看板(154)
14F→:檢座會覺有悔意,刑度會低些,聽律師的快和解05/19 23:16
2F→:就影印 之後去警局就好啦05/17 17:27
11F→:4可告看看誹謗呀.05/17 11:37
17F→:看看有沒有被罰站之類的 告強制05/17 17:28
101F→:我才發現這裡不能噓05/16 14:39
3F→:你不回那句的話恐嚇直接告就好了05/12 21:20
3F→:偵查庭兩造都沒開說05/06 17:18
6F→:那有其他可以告的嗎?05/08 00:36
8F→:是管委會搞的05/09 00:11
2F推:XD...樓上害我笑了04/08 22:59
11F→:我之前爬過大約一千篇的公然侮辱判決文,實在沒發現有03/31 01:34
12F→:判決是顯示沒主詞 不構成的...03/31 01:34
14F→:新聞就再說盧XX, 這就算特定、可推知人了。03/31 01:37
17F→:假設A PO文章 B在下面回 垃圾、X你娘。這很明顯地再說A03/31 01:39
19F→:我覺得是可以辯,但我猜檢座應該很難取信= =03/31 01:41
21F推:違背一般常理XD03/31 01:43
26F→:我覺得得看原文章而判斷,這案件一堆被告都沒PO出完整03/31 01:48
27F→:的犯罪事實。03/31 01:48
29F→:我還是覺得至少也有緩起訴。03/31 01:50
8F→:不太懂為什麼算"散布"03/31 01:44
11F→:嗯嗯 了解。03/31 01:55
12F→:但我覺得應該很難查...03/31 01:55
2F→:那是以非財產權的案件 三千元計?03/17 19:09