作者查詢 / raiderho
作者 raiderho 在 PTT [ PhD ] 看板的留言(推文), 共17則
限定看板:PhD
看板排序:
全部CFantasy2384Tennis1308NBA909ClashRoyale643Federer630Badminton358HwangYih337Detective306SF259LightNovel242Cavaliers168book146Economics140Fantasy135Gossiping126Olympics_ISG112MobileComm97nCoV201981HCKuo78Fiction77Statistics71CMWang61NTUNL56Hingis55Gulong53Falcom50Math48gay47R983230XX45NTUMystery40Asian-MLB37AfterPhD34GO33logic33MLB33WomenTalk33Wan-Ray-An30Nadal29C_Chat20NTU-Fantasy20Elephants19Lakers19Shana19A-Rod17PhD17Japan_Travel16SAN16RedSox15SYSOP15Hakuai84-6113ChaCha2312GBR_Tennis12Haruhi12Matsuzaka_1812movie12NTU12HatePolitics11R993230XX11Baseball10LeBronJames10Stock10Transfer10Tsao9shinkai8Boy-Girl7Henin7Sixers7Tech_Job7novel6NY-Yankees6R89325xxx6Anti-ramp5ASHS5Cobras5DummyHistory5e-coupon5graduate5Literprize5media-chaos5MiamiHeat5PublicIssue5TypeMoon5Android4Athletics4bookhouse4cjjhs3274Djokovic4FuMouDiscuss4GuJian4HomeTeach4Kaohsiung4MIN-Twins4NDMC-PH234Spain_PL4studyabroad4Windows4AC_In3ALL-RUSSIANS3Angels3Beauty3DataScience3FJULaw-Team3Indians3joke3NBA_Film3NTUcourse3pal3specialman3TaichungBun3TY_Research3Wen-Shan3Blue_Jays2CCF2ck54th3242CYCUEL95A2E-appliance2EAseries2Ecophilia2Examination2Expansion072FCU-INS93B2FJU-Tennis2GUNNM2Hiking2Jeremy_Lin2Kids_Sucker2Kings2KOTDFansClub2KS92-3162Latin_AM2Lions2lths-88-M2Military2MLSH493122NCKU_CSIE932Nets2NKUTEE2NTPU-LAND90B2Nuggets2Orioles2Physics2PttHistory2Sampras2Seikai2sinica2sky2TKU-ee-91a2tutor2AllTogether1ANIMAX1Army-Sir1Astros1B88A012XX1B921010XX1B97A013XX1BaseballSYS1BBSmovie1BioChem_951BLAZERS1Braves1car1CH8th3091ching-yi1ck50th3231ck51st3211ck51st3291ck52nd3131ck55th3121ck58th3021CN_Entertain1CodeJob1CTSH913021CTSH963011DIP_Baseball1Doraemon1emprisenovel1FCU_EE97A1Feminism1FigureSkate1FJ_Astroclub1FJU-ACC90a1FJU-BA91C1FJU_GF1FSHS-91-3011Grizzlies1HarukiMuraka1Hate1Hawks1historia1HSNU_8541HSNU_9381HSNU_9901IMO_Taiwan1Instant_Mess1JinYong1L_LifePlan1lesbian1Mariners1marriage1MingDao33H21mknoheya1Monkeys1NCCU03_ETHNO1NCCU03_PF1NCCU03_PSYGR1NCCU_Fantasy1NCCU_Tennis1NCCUPA_SPORT1NCHU-AGR001NCKU-YP1NCUFingrad031NDMC-M1031NetSecurity1Ning1Notebook1NTU-IPH921NTUCivilism1NTUFRC-921NTUSA1NTUST-DT92-11NTUT_en489b1Odoko-juku1oeo_491Option1PACERS1PHX-Suns1Phy-Softball1poem1Psy-Team1PSY_Baseball1R923220PA1R943230XX1Rockets1Roddick1Royals1RSSH94_3011Sabermetrics1Scifi_Drama1SCU_CIS-92A1SocialSoccer1SportLottery1StephenCurry1TFSHS69th1201TKU_HisSB1TS3rdZheng1TTU-US941Ur-hsing1watch1WhiteSox1wonderland1WuLing46-3171YomiuriGIANT1YP91-3031YP91-3111YuanChuang1YuiAragaki1Yup02-031Yup02-041Yup99-061YZU-EE95A1<< 收起看板(260)
首頁
上一頁
1
下一頁
尾頁
6F推: 什麼廢心得,讓厲害的人認可哪有那麼簡單10/19 20:09
31F推: 幾個月前在博後版的推文仍然適用,說得更明白些:既然要06/20 19:39
32F→: 投經濟領域期刊,有義務說明貴觀點/方法到底比現有的經06/20 19:39
33F→: 濟框架(與計量方法)優勢在哪。不然,根據你的描述,合理06/20 19:39
34F→: 推論只會是,幾十年前老框架在實證上比不上近年的經濟學06/20 19:39
35F→: 框架(從而被淘汰)。應用經典統計物理概念到經濟學的嘗試06/20 19:39
36F→: 並不罕見,然而大部分在經濟學界不是那麼受歡迎,一個可06/20 19:39
37F→: 能原因是,文章並沒有提出更生動的經濟學圖像(這需要一06/20 19:39
38F→: 個強而有力的例子,目前你在批踢踢的文章都沒有提供這種06/20 19:39
39F→: 例子,或者沒讓我們看懂),因此只能比較模型預測或擬合06/20 19:39
40F→: 能力,然而,這必須要與「近年」經濟學計量方法直接對比06/20 19:39
41F→: ,否則也很難說服經濟學領域學者。06/20 19:39
9F→: google sci-hub03/11 14:15
8F推: 主要結論錯誤的論文多的是,當研究生久了都可以發現幾篇10/22 00:50
9F→: 不用大驚小怪。若無造假嫌疑,通常期刊不會主動撤稿10/22 00:51
2F推: 其實可以直接開啊。12/02 13:02
32F→:把人格問題歸因於phD,瞧不起phD訓練,見微知著企業文化03/12 15:06
首頁
上一頁
1
下一頁
尾頁