作者查詢 / ShieChang
作者 ShieChang 在 PTT [ DPP ] 看板的留言(推文), 共414則
限定看板:DPP
看板排序:
全部Cobras614DPP414Feminism273MobileComm248KMT127PHX-Suns109politics105GreenParty95CMWang92TFSHS66th30663CPBL56CGI-Game53Celtics50car45MLBGAME44MiamiHeat37Tennis36kapilands32HCKuo28Olympics_ISG28wikibaseball27Cavaliers21Little-Games21marvel17Broad_Band16Policy16Whales16PttHistory15WomenTalk15Boy-Girl14Gossiping14NBAGAME11dog10home-sale10RedSox10TY_Research10EZsoft9Lifeismoney9NY-Yankees9Education8LinKou8marriage8Monkeys8WuBai_and_CB8Baseball6NYUST97_MBA6pal6PokemonGO6MLB5NTHU_IEEM-955Tech_Job5ChineseTeach4joke4Old-Games4PHP4share4StupidClown4Tsao4DailyArticle3Hewitt3Law-Fala3NDMC-D643PC_Shopping3TFSHS68th3163YP94-3103Anti-Cancer2Baseball_Sim2basketballTW2BuyTogether2CLHu2Interior2L_HappyLivin2Matsuzaka_182NCCU_Tennis2NCCU_trans2nCoV20192puzzle2Salary2SCU_ACC_96A2TSHS2VET_942A-Rod1Ajax1ArenaOfValor1ask1Beauty1CarShop1CCF1Celine1CK-HG1CMU_Guitar421CSMU-HSA961CVS1Dragons1Emergency1FCU_EE97A1FCU_SB_CLUB1Golden-Award1Guardians1Headphone1Jewelry1Knicks1KS87-3021KS91-3051KS92-3191LHU1Mavericks1MDscience6th1movie1Nadal1NBA1NBA_Film1NCTU-STAT95G1NDHU-dc961NFU1NTUT_EE490A1Nuggets1NYUST1PeopleSeries1PH-941Pilots1PureYouth1Redology1Roddick1Royals1Soft_Job1Softball1soul1SS_Service1SSSH-16th-Fk1TFSHS64th3181TFSHS66th3191TKU-ChemSB1TSH96_SM1TTU-talk1WarCraft1WuLing46-3171<< 收起看板(137)
8F推:法官都同意羈押還在檢調,要說140.113.244.179 01/09 21:06
9F→:司法不公,司法已死啦140.113.244.179 01/09 21:06
6F推:幹嘛回一個在別版推文的= =140.113.244.179 11/23 20:59
7F→:把他轉過來再回推文真的很奇怪140.113.244.179 11/23 21:00
29F推:a大是說你說退稅能增加額外根本是唬爛140.113.244.179 11/23 20:52
30F→:這樣講會不會比較清楚點XD140.113.244.179 11/23 20:53
34F→:兩個都a耶= =140.113.244.179 11/23 20:54
40F→:你去看你PO的那篇140.113.244.179 11/23 20:55
41F→:所以也比較不會有只存不花的情形出現...140.113.244.179 11/23 20:56
1F推:有些人窮到連稅都不用繳,那退稅對那些140.113.244.179 11/23 19:10
2F→:人有啥用140.113.244.179 11/23 19:10
14F推:原來用退稅方式不會增加額外成本= =140.113.244.179 11/23 20:50
15F→:這啥怪說法140.113.244.179 11/23 20:50
1F推:應該不是要改成你說的那樣吧= =?140.113.244.179 11/09 14:59
1F→:這問題應該是哪些地方能舉辦集會遊行140.113.244.179 11/09 14:35
7F推:這是路權的取得問題,跟集會遊行沒關係140.113.244.179 11/09 14:40
8F→:吧?140.113.244.179 11/09 14:40
13F推:現行體制下,路權跟集會遊行是分開的喔140.113.244.179 11/09 14:43
17F→:應該是這樣,或者這麼說140.113.244.179 11/09 14:45
18F→:沒你說的那樣啦140.113.244.179 11/09 14:45
21F→:你可以集會遊行,但是地點必須要你有權140.113.244.179 11/09 14:46
23F→:占用才能140.113.244.179 11/09 14:46
24F→:這又不一樣了,依法是不能影響其他用路140.113.244.179 11/09 14:47
26F→:人權利,假如沒有影響那就合法140.113.244.179 11/09 14:47
28F→:不需要另外申請路權140.113.244.179 11/09 14:48
30F→:現在是即使你有路權,你也不一定能集會140.113.244.179 11/09 14:49
31F→:遊行140.113.244.179 11/09 14:49
32F→:有影響那警察機關就有權介入140.113.244.179 11/09 14:50
2F推:集會遊行本來就是憲法保障的基本權力140.113.244.179 11/09 14:34
3F→:所以改成報備制的確比較符合憲法精神140.113.244.179 11/09 14:34
4F→:阻礙交通就是違法140.113.244.179 11/09 14:34
1F推:你所說的問題是集會遊行的規範跟140.113.244.179 11/09 14:27
2F→:由許可制變報備制沒太大關係140.113.244.179 11/09 14:28
17F推:推一下140.113.244.179 11/07 23:43
7F推:又回到老問題啦,KMT立法院絕對優勢140.113.244.179 11/07 22:49
8F→:這麼久了,怎不改?140.113.244.179 11/07 22:50
10F→:那是上一任立委時提的...140.113.244.179 11/07 22:51
11F→:現任立委KMT絕對優勢吧?140.113.244.179 11/07 22:51
13F推:就事論事,說不過就拿護航來說,科科140.113.244.179 11/07 23:03