[討論] 為什麼ACC突然變成不可或缺了...消失
一直有這個疑問
ACC 主動定距跟車 應該是歸類在舒適配備吧?
也就是有很好 沒有也沒關係
類似定速 push start keyless 電子手剎車 autohold這些
AEB才是算安全配備
而倒車顯影 前雷達大概介在中間
這幾年風向怎麼變成好像沒有ACC就不行了一樣
可是就算在當年只求被動安全ok的時代
也很少聽到有人要求一定要有keyless 要有autohold 要有電子手剎車 沒有=爛車
為什麼突然ACC變成非有不可一樣 跟安全配備一樣重要呢?
買swift sport跑山路難道還用ACC嗎 XD
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.44.76.190
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/car/M.1530806575.A.3BC.html
推
07/06 00:04, , 1F
07/06 00:04, 1F
推
07/06 00:04, , 2F
07/06 00:04, 2F
推
07/06 00:05, , 3F
07/06 00:05, 3F
推
07/06 00:06, , 4F
07/06 00:06, 4F
→
07/06 00:06, , 5F
07/06 00:06, 5F
推
07/06 00:07, , 6F
07/06 00:07, 6F
→
07/06 00:07, , 7F
07/06 00:07, 7F
推
07/06 00:07, , 8F
07/06 00:07, 8F
推
07/06 00:07, , 9F
07/06 00:07, 9F
→
07/06 00:08, , 10F
07/06 00:08, 10F
→
07/06 00:09, , 11F
07/06 00:09, 11F
→
07/06 00:09, , 12F
07/06 00:09, 12F
推
07/06 00:09, , 13F
07/06 00:09, 13F
推
07/06 00:10, , 14F
07/06 00:10, 14F
→
07/06 00:11, , 15F
07/06 00:11, 15F
→
07/06 00:11, , 16F
07/06 00:11, 16F
→
07/06 00:12, , 17F
07/06 00:12, 17F
推
07/06 00:12, , 18F
07/06 00:12, 18F
→
07/06 00:13, , 19F
07/06 00:13, 19F
→
07/06 00:13, , 20F
07/06 00:13, 20F
→
07/06 00:13, , 21F
07/06 00:13, 21F
噓
07/06 00:13, , 22F
07/06 00:13, 22F
→
07/06 00:13, , 23F
07/06 00:13, 23F
→
07/06 00:13, , 24F
07/06 00:13, 24F
→
07/06 00:14, , 25F
07/06 00:14, 25F
推
07/06 00:14, , 26F
07/06 00:14, 26F
→
07/06 00:14, , 27F
07/06 00:14, 27F
→
07/06 00:15, , 28F
07/06 00:15, 28F
噓
07/06 00:18, , 29F
07/06 00:18, 29F
→
07/06 00:18, , 30F
07/06 00:18, 30F
→
07/06 00:18, , 31F
07/06 00:18, 31F
→
07/06 00:19, , 32F
07/06 00:19, 32F
噓
07/06 00:20, , 33F
07/06 00:20, 33F
→
07/06 00:21, , 34F
07/06 00:21, 34F
推
07/06 00:23, , 35F
07/06 00:23, 35F
推
07/06 00:26, , 36F
07/06 00:26, 36F
→
07/06 00:27, , 37F
07/06 00:27, 37F
推
07/06 00:28, , 38F
07/06 00:28, 38F
→
07/06 00:28, , 39F
07/06 00:28, 39F
還有 176 則推文
推
07/06 09:46, , 216F
07/06 09:46, 216F
推
07/06 09:48, , 217F
07/06 09:48, 217F
推
07/06 09:49, , 218F
07/06 09:49, 218F
推
07/06 09:58, , 219F
07/06 09:58, 219F
推
07/06 10:04, , 220F
07/06 10:04, 220F
推
07/06 10:11, , 221F
07/06 10:11, 221F
→
07/06 10:11, , 222F
07/06 10:11, 222F
推
07/06 10:39, , 223F
07/06 10:39, 223F
推
07/06 11:01, , 224F
07/06 11:01, 224F
→
07/06 11:01, , 225F
07/06 11:01, 225F
推
07/06 11:05, , 226F
07/06 11:05, 226F
→
07/06 11:06, , 227F
07/06 11:06, 227F
→
07/06 11:07, , 228F
07/06 11:07, 228F
→
07/06 11:07, , 229F
07/06 11:07, 229F
→
07/06 11:08, , 230F
07/06 11:08, 230F
→
07/06 11:08, , 231F
07/06 11:08, 231F
推
07/06 11:26, , 232F
07/06 11:26, 232F
→
07/06 11:31, , 233F
07/06 11:31, 233F
→
07/06 11:31, , 234F
07/06 11:31, 234F
→
07/06 12:58, , 235F
07/06 12:58, 235F
→
07/06 12:59, , 236F
07/06 12:59, 236F
→
07/06 13:00, , 237F
07/06 13:00, 237F
→
07/06 13:01, , 238F
07/06 13:01, 238F
→
07/06 13:01, , 239F
07/06 13:01, 239F
→
07/06 13:03, , 240F
07/06 13:03, 240F
→
07/06 13:05, , 241F
07/06 13:05, 241F
推
07/06 13:14, , 242F
07/06 13:14, 242F
推
07/06 13:20, , 243F
07/06 13:20, 243F
推
07/06 13:42, , 244F
07/06 13:42, 244F
→
07/06 13:43, , 245F
07/06 13:43, 245F
推
07/06 14:00, , 246F
07/06 14:00, 246F
噓
07/06 14:57, , 247F
07/06 14:57, 247F
推
07/06 17:55, , 248F
07/06 17:55, 248F
推
07/06 19:06, , 249F
07/06 19:06, 249F
推
07/06 21:36, , 250F
07/06 21:36, 250F
噓
07/06 22:56, , 251F
07/06 22:56, 251F
→
07/06 22:56, , 252F
07/06 22:56, 252F
→
07/06 22:56, , 253F
07/06 22:56, 253F
推
07/06 22:56, , 254F
07/06 22:56, 254F
推
07/07 10:09, , 255F
07/07 10:09, 255F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 22 篇):