[問題] BMW內裝到底輸BENZ輸在哪??
BMW底盤強 這是眾所皆知 這沒啥好爭辯的
說到內裝 就一堆人說 賓士內裝好很多
到底好在哪???????
是說BMW沒給影音設備?? 還是少了空調設備??
看到賓士那個大大的電話數字鍵盤 就覺得好笑
現在誰還在用汽車上面的數字鍵盤打電話??
是說「按鍵」比較多 就是內裝比較好喔??
還是說氣氛燈?? 現在新5系的氣氛燈 說真的啦
那根本就是沒屁用的東西 弄個360度室內顏色燈
就叫做內裝質感好喔?? 那根本就是騙潘仔的東西
開車就是開車 你把車室弄成色情按摩院幹嘛??
方便車上打炮嗎?? 白痴都知道要去motel
一個駕駛者 常摸到的東西 就是方向盤、排檔桿、坐椅
其他弄那麼好幹嘛?? 加價二三十萬 內裝弄得像按摩院一樣
結果家裡破破爛爛的 睡爛床 坐爛傢俱 這太好笑了吧??
開車就是油門加速、底盤軟Q、煞車線性 開起來靈活 隨心所欲
這才是一個會開車 懂車的人 應該注重的地方吧??
內裝真的有那麼重要嗎??????????
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.38.178.39
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/car/M.1502426060.A.377.html
推
08/11 12:36, , 1F
08/11 12:36, 1F
推
08/11 12:36, , 2F
08/11 12:36, 2F
BMW內裝有像毛胚屋那麼慘喔?? 比喻不對吧??
→
08/11 12:38, , 3F
08/11 12:38, 3F
推
08/11 12:38, , 4F
08/11 12:38, 4F
→
08/11 12:38, , 5F
08/11 12:38, 5F
推
08/11 12:38, , 6F
08/11 12:38, 6F
推
08/11 12:39, , 7F
08/11 12:39, 7F
→
08/11 12:40, , 8F
08/11 12:40, 8F
→
08/11 12:41, , 9F
08/11 12:41, 9F
→
08/11 12:41, , 10F
08/11 12:41, 10F
→
08/11 12:41, , 11F
08/11 12:41, 11F
→
08/11 12:42, , 12F
08/11 12:42, 12F
→
08/11 12:42, , 13F
08/11 12:42, 13F
→
08/11 12:42, , 14F
08/11 12:42, 14F
推
08/11 12:42, , 15F
08/11 12:42, 15F
→
08/11 12:42, , 16F
08/11 12:42, 16F
原來如此!! 原來內裝越像按摩院的車主 家裡裝潢一定更氣派 長知識了!!
→
08/11 12:43, , 17F
08/11 12:43, 17F
推
08/11 12:43, , 18F
08/11 12:43, 18F
所以到底這代賓士的內裝好在哪?? 軟質塑膠很重要?? 開車有沒有一直摸一直摸??
還是說carbon看起來好帥好屌好有質感 結果只是看爽的??
※ 編輯: tangolosss (114.38.178.39), 08/11/2017 12:48:24
推
08/11 12:47, , 19F
08/11 12:47, 19F
→
08/11 12:47, , 20F
08/11 12:47, 20F
推
08/11 12:48, , 21F
08/11 12:48, 21F
→
08/11 12:48, , 22F
08/11 12:48, 22F
噓
08/11 12:48, , 23F
08/11 12:48, 23F
→
08/11 12:50, , 24F
08/11 12:50, 24F
→
08/11 12:50, , 25F
08/11 12:50, 25F
噓
08/11 12:50, , 26F
08/11 12:50, 26F
→
08/11 12:50, , 27F
08/11 12:50, 27F
推
08/11 12:52, , 28F
08/11 12:52, 28F
→
08/11 12:52, , 29F
08/11 12:52, 29F
了解 我也是這兩牌子在考慮 只是不懂 為何BMW的駕駛體驗 無法彌補掉輸BENZ的內裝
甚至內裝好的還可以賣更貴
噓
08/11 12:52, , 30F
08/11 12:52, 30F
推
08/11 12:55, , 31F
08/11 12:55, 31F
推
08/11 12:56, , 32F
08/11 12:56, 32F
推
08/11 12:57, , 33F
08/11 12:57, 33F
→
08/11 12:57, , 34F
08/11 12:57, 34F
→
08/11 12:57, , 35F
08/11 12:57, 35F
還有 85 則推文
還有 2 段內文
推
08/11 14:41, , 121F
08/11 14:41, 121F
→
08/11 14:43, , 122F
08/11 14:43, 122F
→
08/11 14:44, , 123F
08/11 14:44, 123F
推
08/11 14:44, , 124F
08/11 14:44, 124F
推
08/11 14:45, , 125F
08/11 14:45, 125F
→
08/11 14:45, , 126F
08/11 14:45, 126F
→
08/11 14:48, , 127F
08/11 14:48, 127F
→
08/11 14:49, , 128F
08/11 14:49, 128F
噓
08/11 14:50, , 129F
08/11 14:50, 129F
噓
08/11 14:50, , 130F
08/11 14:50, 130F
推
08/11 14:51, , 131F
08/11 14:51, 131F
噓
08/11 14:59, , 132F
08/11 14:59, 132F
噓
08/11 15:16, , 133F
08/11 15:16, 133F
推
08/11 15:19, , 134F
08/11 15:19, 134F
推
08/11 15:44, , 135F
08/11 15:44, 135F
噓
08/11 16:00, , 136F
08/11 16:00, 136F
噓
08/11 16:01, , 137F
08/11 16:01, 137F
→
08/11 16:06, , 138F
08/11 16:06, 138F
噓
08/11 16:16, , 139F
08/11 16:16, 139F
推
08/11 16:38, , 140F
08/11 16:38, 140F
噓
08/11 16:53, , 141F
08/11 16:53, 141F
推
08/11 16:58, , 142F
08/11 16:58, 142F
→
08/11 17:05, , 143F
08/11 17:05, 143F
推
08/11 17:39, , 144F
08/11 17:39, 144F
推
08/11 18:15, , 145F
08/11 18:15, 145F
噓
08/11 18:56, , 146F
08/11 18:56, 146F
→
08/11 19:17, , 147F
08/11 19:17, 147F
噓
08/11 20:04, , 148F
08/11 20:04, 148F
推
08/11 20:06, , 149F
08/11 20:06, 149F
→
08/11 20:29, , 150F
08/11 20:29, 150F
噓
08/11 20:31, , 151F
08/11 20:31, 151F
噓
08/11 21:42, , 152F
08/11 21:42, 152F
→
08/11 21:42, , 153F
08/11 21:42, 153F
→
08/11 22:00, , 154F
08/11 22:00, 154F
→
08/11 22:33, , 155F
08/11 22:33, 155F
噓
08/11 22:45, , 156F
08/11 22:45, 156F
推
08/12 15:45, , 157F
08/12 15:45, 157F
噓
08/12 23:18, , 158F
08/12 23:18, 158F
噓
08/13 15:16, , 159F
08/13 15:16, 159F
噓
11/15 23:47, , 160F
11/15 23:47, 160F
討論串 (同標題文章)