[問題] 書看多了 文筆真的會變好嗎
在下還蠻喜歡看書的
但幾乎都是屬於快速翻過
知道內容大義不求甚解那型的
因此看完一本書我可以跟你講它內容在講什麼
但要能夠融會貫通把書中的思想像自己的東西一樣侃侃而談
實在辦不太到
也不知道是口才本來就不好還是看書的時候沒有慢慢去思索
寫東西文筆感覺幾乎都沒什麼進步 還停留在平鋪直敘的流水帳風格
從以前求學時代作文就一直是我的弱項
不奢求能夠寫出一堆華麗詞藻
但還是希望寫作至少在構想和技巧能夠再高明一些
不知道針對這一點多看一些有的沒有的書有沒有用
還是真的要去特別鑽研寫作才會有明顯進步
每次看到一些人PO的文章就算內容都是一些狗屁
但些作風格就是很讓人佩服或是吸引人讓人想看下去就覺得羨慕
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 220.135.220.79
→
03/19 21:51, , 1F
03/19 21:51, 1F
推
03/19 21:54, , 2F
03/19 21:54, 2F
→
03/19 21:55, , 3F
03/19 21:55, 3F
推
03/19 21:58, , 4F
03/19 21:58, 4F
→
03/19 21:59, , 5F
03/19 21:59, 5F
→
03/19 22:00, , 6F
03/19 22:00, 6F
推
03/19 22:05, , 7F
03/19 22:05, 7F
→
03/19 22:06, , 8F
03/19 22:06, 8F
→
03/19 22:14, , 9F
03/19 22:14, 9F
→
03/19 22:14, , 10F
03/19 22:14, 10F
→
03/19 22:15, , 11F
03/19 22:15, 11F
推
03/19 22:22, , 12F
03/19 22:22, 12F
→
03/19 22:23, , 13F
03/19 22:23, 13F
推
03/19 22:55, , 14F
03/19 22:55, 14F
推
03/19 23:34, , 15F
03/19 23:34, 15F
→
03/19 23:37, , 16F
03/19 23:37, 16F
→
03/19 23:38, , 17F
03/19 23:38, 17F
→
03/19 23:38, , 18F
03/19 23:38, 18F
→
03/19 23:41, , 19F
03/19 23:41, 19F
推
03/20 00:13, , 20F
03/20 00:13, 20F
推
03/20 00:52, , 21F
03/20 00:52, 21F
→
03/20 00:52, , 22F
03/20 00:52, 22F
→
03/20 00:52, , 23F
03/20 00:52, 23F
→
03/20 00:53, , 24F
03/20 00:53, 24F
→
03/20 00:58, , 25F
03/20 00:58, 25F
→
03/20 00:58, , 26F
03/20 00:58, 26F
→
03/20 01:00, , 27F
03/20 01:00, 27F
→
03/20 06:02, , 28F
03/20 06:02, 28F
→
03/20 10:06, , 29F
03/20 10:06, 29F
→
03/20 10:08, , 30F
03/20 10:08, 30F
→
03/20 10:08, , 31F
03/20 10:08, 31F
→
03/20 10:13, , 32F
03/20 10:13, 32F
推
03/20 10:56, , 33F
03/20 10:56, 33F
→
03/20 11:27, , 34F
03/20 11:27, 34F
推
03/20 23:34, , 35F
03/20 23:34, 35F
→
03/21 11:40, , 36F
03/21 11:40, 36F
→
03/21 16:22, , 37F
03/21 16:22, 37F
→
03/23 21:32, , 38F
03/23 21:32, 38F
推
03/26 11:09, , 39F
03/26 11:09, 39F
→
03/26 11:09, , 40F
03/26 11:09, 40F
→
06/21 23:40, , 41F
06/21 23:40, 41F
→
08/12 20:25, , 42F
08/12 20:25, 42F
→
09/14 21:08, , 43F
09/14 21:08, 43F
→
11/06 16:41, , 44F
11/06 16:41, 44F
→
12/31 03:12,
7年前
, 45F
12/31 03:12, 45F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 14 篇):