Re: [問題] 買12吋輪胎被家父怒罵 *補充 (文長
※ 引述《Fugacious (bibliomania)》之銘言:
: 他說
: 他之前還在賣輪胎的時候 (十幾年前到四五年前
: 固滿德、優耐立、益碁為小型工廠
: 沒有整套的生產設備 沒有"打料機"
: 買半成品回來加工
:
之前還在騎GT 125 JR100時,這三家的輪胎剛好都有用過(後輪)
分別是 固滿德G1061 -- 複合胎
優耐立TH558 PROII -- 熱熔胎
益碁 色魔胎 -- 複合胎+熱熔胎紋
這三條在國產價位我都還可以接受,畢竟一條後輪起碼可以騎3000公里
固滿德G1061 -- 難用,以我跑山的用途來說蠻難用的,看胎紋就是一臉雨胎樣,
傾倒速度變慢,配上前輪的BT39SS來說,
過彎感覺後輪跟不上前輪,不過起碼不會滑
TH558 PROII -- 熱胎後還不錯,平路感覺不出來有黏,山路過彎就有點感覺
以號稱熱熔胎整體來說偏硬,過了蜜月期就感覺不出是熱熔胎了
益碁 色魔胎 -- 視覺取向胎,最大亮點就是兩旁都有顏色,
只是這顏色不是永久的,用愈久會愈淡,
過彎表現普普通通,沒有甚麼讓我有印象的地方
這類小廠牌其實都有幾個共通點,胎壁支撐力不足、衰退快且明顯,
蜜月期也不到進口胎的水準,只能算是通勤:熱血=9:1 or 8:2 的騎士想嘗鮮的首選,
以上心得這並不代表我覺得這三家是出來騙錢的,因為他們還是有他們的賣點在
回原po,我寧願用這三家的輪胎,也不會去換甚麼高速胎 699換到好,
正新的胎就都通勤用,動物系列拿來跑山也沒比這三條好用,
當然,便宜、耐用是他家的優點。華豐我倒是都沒用過,
另一家瑪吉斯的6029勒,我記得GT125 和 FT6 的原廠胎都是用這條,
優點耐磨、壽命長,但實在實在實在實在實在他X的有夠滑
GT125的6029,雨天時車身拉直拉正過橋的伸縮縫也會滑,而且是滑超大,
FT6的呢,靠著12吋和車重,沒有滑的這麼誇張,
但雨天在市區轉彎沒有壓到標線、人孔蓋還是有滑過幾次
現在我的FT6 後輪是固滿德的G1091,比起6029來說好多了
而之前GT 125也用過同家的R1 6012R 6103S,也是比6029好太多
結論,大廠牌出的不代表就是好胎,小廠牌出的也不代表是來騙錢的
還是要以自身的騎乘習慣和需求來選胎,而不是選廠牌就好
P.S 10吋後輪我個人最推薦6103S,超黏,但我騎3000就磨到指示塊了...
因為10吋胎便宜,我之前都3000~5000就換一條不同的嚐鮮
12吋的我目前只有用過原廠胎和 前 BT601 後G1091,
所以沒有甚麼比較心得
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.162.137.123
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/biker/M.1473730355.A.C3C.html
推
09/13 09:51, , 1F
09/13 09:51, 1F
推
09/13 09:59, , 2F
09/13 09:59, 2F
→
09/13 09:59, , 3F
09/13 09:59, 3F
→
09/13 09:59, , 4F
09/13 09:59, 4F
→
09/13 10:07, , 5F
09/13 10:07, 5F
→
09/13 10:13, , 6F
09/13 10:13, 6F
→
09/13 10:16, , 7F
09/13 10:16, 7F
→
09/13 10:22, , 8F
09/13 10:22, 8F
推
09/13 10:28, , 9F
09/13 10:28, 9F
推
09/13 10:31, , 10F
09/13 10:31, 10F
推
09/13 10:47, , 11F
09/13 10:47, 11F
→
09/13 10:47, , 12F
09/13 10:47, 12F
→
09/13 10:47, , 13F
09/13 10:47, 13F
推
09/13 10:53, , 14F
09/13 10:53, 14F
→
09/13 10:53, , 15F
09/13 10:53, 15F
→
09/13 10:54, , 16F
09/13 10:54, 16F
推
09/13 11:08, , 17F
09/13 11:08, 17F
推
09/13 11:17, , 18F
09/13 11:17, 18F
→
09/13 11:18, , 19F
09/13 11:18, 19F
噓
09/13 11:19, , 20F
09/13 11:19, 20F
推
09/13 11:21, , 21F
09/13 11:21, 21F
→
09/13 11:26, , 22F
09/13 11:26, 22F
→
09/13 11:27, , 23F
09/13 11:27, 23F
推
09/13 11:36, , 24F
09/13 11:36, 24F
推
09/13 11:46, , 25F
09/13 11:46, 25F
→
09/13 11:48, , 26F
09/13 11:48, 26F
→
09/13 11:49, , 27F
09/13 11:49, 27F
推
09/13 11:57, , 28F
09/13 11:57, 28F
→
09/13 12:20, , 29F
09/13 12:20, 29F
推
09/13 12:49, , 30F
09/13 12:49, 30F
→
09/13 12:49, , 31F
09/13 12:49, 31F
→
09/13 12:56, , 32F
09/13 12:56, 32F
→
09/13 12:57, , 33F
09/13 12:57, 33F
→
09/13 12:58, , 34F
09/13 12:58, 34F
→
09/13 12:59, , 35F
09/13 12:59, 35F
→
09/13 13:01, , 36F
09/13 13:01, 36F
→
09/13 13:02, , 37F
09/13 13:02, 37F
→
09/13 19:50, , 38F
09/13 19:50, 38F
→
09/13 21:42, , 39F
09/13 21:42, 39F
推
09/13 22:31, , 40F
09/13 22:31, 40F
推
09/13 23:48, , 41F
09/13 23:48, 41F
→
09/14 02:25, , 42F
09/14 02:25, 42F
推
09/14 07:15, , 43F
09/14 07:15, 43F
→
09/14 08:09, , 44F
09/14 08:09, 44F
→
09/14 08:10, , 45F
09/14 08:10, 45F
→
09/14 11:28, , 46F
09/14 11:28, 46F
噓
09/14 13:59, , 47F
09/14 13:59, 47F
推
09/14 18:37, , 48F
09/14 18:37, 48F
→
09/14 18:37, , 49F
09/14 18:37, 49F
→
09/14 18:39, , 50F
09/14 18:39, 50F
→
09/15 07:17, , 51F
09/15 07:17, 51F
→
09/15 07:34, , 52F
09/15 07:34, 52F
→
09/15 07:34, , 53F
09/15 07:34, 53F
推
09/15 09:52, , 54F
09/15 09:52, 54F
推
09/15 10:10, , 55F
09/15 10:10, 55F
推
09/15 16:55, , 56F
09/15 16:55, 56F
→
09/15 16:55, , 57F
09/15 16:55, 57F
→
09/15 16:56, , 58F
09/15 16:56, 58F
→
09/15 16:56, , 59F
09/15 16:56, 59F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 5 篇):