Re: The Analysis of Knowledge

看板W-Philosophy作者 (HERESY)時間20年前 (2003/11/03 19:01), 編輯推噓2(200)
留言2則, 2人參與, 最新討論串6/8 (看更多)
※ 引述《popandy (pop)》之銘言: : An Alternative Approach : Above, we noted that the role of the justification condition is to : ensure that the analysis does identify as knowledge a belief that is true : out of luck. The lesson to be learned from the Gettier problem is that the : justification condition by itself cannot ensure this. Even a justified : belief, understood as a belief based on good evidence, can be true : out of luck. Thus if the traditional analysis of knowledge is to exclude : all cases in relation to luck, it must be amended with a suitable fourth : condition, a condition that succeeds in the qualification of knowledge. 版主寫的嗎? 還不錯咧,你英文蠻在行的。 不過我對這段有點想法 「必定要追尋第四個條件」有點太武斷,這第四條件有時第五第六都出來了。 或許可作些修改? 像Alvin Goldman就是以別的方式來進行,詳見 A causal theory of knowing 試圖解答Gettier's problem -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 210.85.6.135

推 140.112.7.59 11/03, , 1F
我跟你打賭版主看過Goldman那篇文章:D
推 140.112.7.59 11/03, 1F

推 210.85.6.135 11/03, , 2F
那很好阿
推 210.85.6.135 11/03, 2F
文章代碼(AID): #_fZMD91 (W-Philosophy)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #_fZMD91 (W-Philosophy)