Re: [F/GO] 好久沒到TM版發FGO文了,想問大家問題
你們覺得魔法少女小圓的QB是騙子嗎?
給你們30秒思考
不是騙子===>營運方不是騙子只是話沒說清楚
是騙子===>有誤導人去錯誤認知的動機
我個人覺得QB是後者
--
推
08/03 01:33,
08/03 01:33
推
08/03 01:39,
08/03 01:39
推
08/03 02:06,
08/03 02:06
推
08/03 02:06,
08/03 02:06
推
08/03 02:13,
08/03 02:13
推
08/03 02:17,
08/03 02:17
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.39.203.174
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/TypeMoon/M.1492165231.A.62E.html
→
04/14 18:21, , 1F
04/14 18:21, 1F
→
04/14 18:21, , 2F
04/14 18:21, 2F
推
04/14 18:22, , 3F
04/14 18:22, 3F
→
04/14 18:22, , 4F
04/14 18:22, 4F
推
04/14 18:23, , 5F
04/14 18:23, 5F
→
04/14 18:23, , 6F
04/14 18:23, 6F
→
04/14 18:28, , 7F
04/14 18:28, 7F
推
04/14 18:28, , 8F
04/14 18:28, 8F
→
04/14 18:31, , 9F
04/14 18:31, 9F
→
04/14 18:33, , 10F
04/14 18:33, 10F
我覺得雙方都沒有錯
看你是從什麼角度去看而已
重點還是在花了X單抽不到角色時..
http://i.imgur.com/OVw2aGl.jpg

※ 編輯: u067 (114.39.203.174), 04/14/2017 18:38:02
→
04/14 18:34, , 11F
04/14 18:34, 11F
噓
04/14 18:35, , 12F
04/14 18:35, 12F
雙方都沒有錯
為什麼一定要說另一方是錯的?
→
04/14 18:37, , 13F
04/14 18:37, 13F
※ 編輯: u067 (114.39.203.174), 04/14/2017 18:38:26
※ 編輯: u067 (114.39.203.174), 04/14/2017 18:39:56
→
04/14 18:43, , 14F
04/14 18:43, 14F
→
04/14 18:43, , 15F
04/14 18:43, 15F
推
04/14 18:49, , 16F
04/14 18:49, 16F
→
04/14 18:55, , 17F
04/14 18:55, 17F
→
04/14 18:55, , 18F
04/14 18:55, 18F
→
04/14 18:55, , 19F
04/14 18:55, 19F
→
04/14 18:58, , 20F
04/14 18:58, 20F
→
04/14 18:59, , 21F
04/14 18:59, 21F
推
04/14 19:01, , 22F
04/14 19:01, 22F
→
04/14 19:03, , 23F
04/14 19:03, 23F
噓
04/14 19:03, , 24F
04/14 19:03, 24F
大家想法不一樣 這樣就夠了 我覺得哪一方都沒錯啊
我討論對於官方主不主動公開機率的看法 這可以吧?
推
04/14 19:05, , 25F
04/14 19:05, 25F
推
04/14 19:07, , 26F
04/14 19:07, 26F
→
04/14 19:08, , 27F
04/14 19:08, 27F
→
04/14 19:08, , 28F
04/14 19:08, 28F
→
04/14 19:12, , 29F
04/14 19:12, 29F
→
04/14 19:13, , 30F
04/14 19:13, 30F
推
04/14 19:13, , 31F
04/14 19:13, 31F
如果PICK UP.只比其他人多0.0001% 官方不公佈很合理.他也沒
義務這樣做.但是應該有人會覺得是騙人吧
所以我建議覺得F/GO的PICK UP是在騙人的版友可以請FGO公開機率
→
04/14 19:19, , 32F
04/14 19:19, 32F
→
04/14 19:20, , 33F
04/14 19:20, 33F
→
04/14 19:20, , 34F
04/14 19:20, 34F
→
04/14 19:20, , 35F
04/14 19:20, 35F
→
04/14 19:21, , 36F
04/14 19:21, 36F
→
04/14 19:21, , 37F
04/14 19:21, 37F
→
04/14 19:27, , 38F
04/14 19:27, 38F
至少FGO PICK UP有感.比早年的GBF好多了
→
04/14 19:28, , 39F
04/14 19:28, 39F
故意說曖昧不清的話.沒有直接明說事實.導致讓人聯想到其他錯誤情況.我覺得就算了
當然只是我覺得.其他人覺得不是也可以
→
04/14 19:31, , 40F
04/14 19:31, 40F
→
04/14 19:31, , 41F
04/14 19:31, 41F
→
04/14 19:31, , 42F
04/14 19:31, 42F
我沒說你不能噓啊 這是你不贊同我文章的直接表達方式.
其他人說的就隨他去吧(?
推
04/14 19:34, , 43F
04/14 19:34, 43F
→
04/14 19:34, , 44F
04/14 19:34, 44F
→
04/14 19:35, , 45F
04/14 19:35, 45F
→
04/14 19:35, , 46F
04/14 19:35, 46F
→
04/14 19:35, , 47F
04/14 19:35, 47F
→
04/14 19:36, , 48F
04/14 19:36, 48F
→
04/14 19:37, , 49F
04/14 19:37, 49F
→
04/14 19:37, , 50F
04/14 19:37, 50F
→
04/14 19:37, , 51F
04/14 19:37, 51F
我只是把我推文回的色碼去掉
※ 編輯: u067 (114.39.203.174), 04/14/2017 19:40:53
→
04/14 19:50, , 52F
04/14 19:50, 52F
→
04/14 19:51, , 53F
04/14 19:51, 53F
→
04/14 19:53, , 54F
04/14 19:53, 54F
→
04/14 19:54, , 55F
04/14 19:54, 55F
→
04/14 19:55, , 56F
04/14 19:55, 56F
推
04/14 19:55, , 57F
04/14 19:55, 57F
→
04/14 19:55, , 58F
04/14 19:55, 58F
→
04/14 19:56, , 59F
04/14 19:56, 59F
→
04/14 19:57, , 60F
04/14 19:57, 60F
→
04/14 20:00, , 61F
04/14 20:00, 61F
推
04/14 20:01, , 62F
04/14 20:01, 62F
→
04/14 20:02, , 63F
04/14 20:02, 63F
→
04/14 20:02, , 64F
04/14 20:02, 64F
→
04/14 20:02, , 65F
04/14 20:02, 65F
推
04/14 20:03, , 66F
04/14 20:03, 66F
→
04/14 20:03, , 67F
04/14 20:03, 67F
→
04/14 20:05, , 68F
04/14 20:05, 68F
→
04/14 20:05, , 69F
04/14 20:05, 69F
→
04/14 20:06, , 70F
04/14 20:06, 70F
推
04/14 21:41, , 71F
04/14 21:41, 71F
→
04/14 21:42, , 72F
04/14 21:42, 72F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 11 之 12 篇):