[討論] 公司可以因為員工私下抱怨而開除嗎
(代po)
朋友因為在賴群組中講公司壞話
而群組中有抓耙子
抓耙子把訊息拿給高層看
高層就召集全公司會議然後公布對話(名字碼掉)
說這些員工涉及侮辱跟毀謗
然後就逼他們自請離職
當天早上就被消失了
1. 私人群組(人數<10)中的抱怨有涉及法律問題嗎?
2. 公司這樣擅自公開私人對話有觸法嗎?
(在想說是不是因為怕反被告才碼掉名字)
3. 抱怨的時候人名一律都用代號(例如:禿頭哥),這樣有算人身攻擊嗎?
請各位大大開示
在這恐怖的社會中小小魯蛇員工要怎麼保護自己
連下班抱怨公司都會被吉
好~恐~怖~啊~
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.82.169.172
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Tech_Job/M.1504936350.A.B99.html
推
09/09 13:55, , 1F
09/09 13:55, 1F
推
09/09 13:58, , 2F
09/09 13:58, 2F
→
09/09 14:07, , 3F
09/09 14:07, 3F
→
09/09 14:08, , 4F
09/09 14:08, 4F
→
09/09 14:08, , 5F
09/09 14:08, 5F
推
09/09 14:13, , 6F
09/09 14:13, 6F
推
09/09 14:14, , 7F
09/09 14:14, 7F
→
09/09 14:19, , 8F
09/09 14:19, 8F
→
09/09 14:22, , 9F
09/09 14:22, 9F
聽說因為抱怨的內容提到一些關於油水之類的...
對於高層來說是眼中釘吧
他們自願是自願沒錯
不過當下那種情形有人可以分享硬幹上去的經驗嗎?
※ 編輯: cinvle (111.82.169.172), 09/09/2017 14:30:06
推
09/09 14:30, , 10F
09/09 14:30, 10F
推
09/09 14:35, , 11F
09/09 14:35, 11F
→
09/09 14:35, , 12F
09/09 14:35, 12F
→
09/09 14:35, , 13F
09/09 14:35, 13F
→
09/09 14:36, , 14F
09/09 14:36, 14F
→
09/09 14:37, , 15F
09/09 14:37, 15F
→
09/09 14:38, , 16F
09/09 14:38, 16F
→
09/09 14:44, , 17F
09/09 14:44, 17F
推
09/09 14:48, , 18F
09/09 14:48, 18F
推
09/09 14:57, , 19F
09/09 14:57, 19F
推
09/09 14:57, , 20F
09/09 14:57, 20F
→
09/09 14:57, , 21F
09/09 14:57, 21F
→
09/09 14:58, , 22F
09/09 14:58, 22F
推
09/09 14:59, , 23F
09/09 14:59, 23F
推
09/09 14:59, , 24F
09/09 14:59, 24F
→
09/09 14:59, , 25F
09/09 14:59, 25F
推
09/09 15:02, , 26F
09/09 15:02, 26F
推
09/09 15:04, , 27F
09/09 15:04, 27F
→
09/09 15:05, , 28F
09/09 15:05, 28F
→
09/09 15:06, , 29F
09/09 15:06, 29F
→
09/09 15:06, , 30F
09/09 15:06, 30F
推
09/09 15:08, , 31F
09/09 15:08, 31F
→
09/09 15:08, , 32F
09/09 15:08, 32F
推
09/09 15:12, , 33F
09/09 15:12, 33F
推
09/09 15:13, , 34F
09/09 15:13, 34F
→
09/09 15:16, , 35F
09/09 15:16, 35F
→
09/09 15:28, , 36F
09/09 15:28, 36F
推
09/09 15:51, , 37F
09/09 15:51, 37F
推
09/09 16:14, , 38F
09/09 16:14, 38F
推
09/09 16:16, , 39F
09/09 16:16, 39F
推
09/09 16:27, , 40F
09/09 16:27, 40F
→
09/09 16:27, , 41F
09/09 16:27, 41F
→
09/09 16:27, , 42F
09/09 16:27, 42F
→
09/09 16:27, , 43F
09/09 16:27, 43F
→
09/09 16:28, , 44F
09/09 16:28, 44F
推
09/09 16:35, , 45F
09/09 16:35, 45F
→
09/09 16:35, , 46F
09/09 16:35, 46F
噓
09/09 16:37, , 47F
09/09 16:37, 47F
→
09/09 16:37, , 48F
09/09 16:37, 48F
→
09/09 16:37, , 49F
09/09 16:37, 49F
噓
09/09 16:41, , 50F
09/09 16:41, 50F
→
09/09 16:41, , 51F
09/09 16:41, 51F
→
09/09 16:45, , 52F
09/09 16:45, 52F
噓
09/09 17:44, , 53F
09/09 17:44, 53F
推
09/09 17:53, , 54F
09/09 17:53, 54F
→
09/09 17:59, , 55F
09/09 17:59, 55F
噓
09/09 18:48, , 56F
09/09 18:48, 56F
推
09/09 19:34, , 57F
09/09 19:34, 57F
→
09/09 19:34, , 58F
09/09 19:34, 58F
推
09/09 19:38, , 59F
09/09 19:38, 59F
推
09/09 20:32, , 60F
09/09 20:32, 60F
→
09/09 20:32, , 61F
09/09 20:32, 61F
推
09/09 20:33, , 62F
09/09 20:33, 62F
推
09/09 21:20, , 63F
09/09 21:20, 63F
推
09/09 21:20, , 64F
09/09 21:20, 64F
→
09/09 21:20, , 65F
09/09 21:20, 65F
→
09/09 21:22, , 66F
09/09 21:22, 66F
→
09/09 21:34, , 67F
09/09 21:34, 67F
推
09/09 23:43, , 68F
09/09 23:43, 68F
→
09/09 23:43, , 69F
09/09 23:43, 69F
→
09/09 23:45, , 70F
09/09 23:45, 70F
→
09/09 23:46, , 71F
09/09 23:46, 71F
→
09/09 23:47, , 72F
09/09 23:47, 72F
→
09/09 23:47, , 73F
09/09 23:47, 73F
→
09/10 00:06, , 74F
09/10 00:06, 74F
→
09/10 00:12, , 75F
09/10 00:12, 75F
→
09/10 00:13, , 76F
09/10 00:13, 76F
推
09/10 01:29, , 77F
09/10 01:29, 77F
→
09/10 09:15, , 78F
09/10 09:15, 78F
推
09/10 14:38, , 79F
09/10 14:38, 79F
→
09/10 17:47, , 80F
09/10 17:47, 80F
→
09/10 17:47, , 81F
09/10 17:47, 81F
→
09/11 14:29, , 82F
09/11 14:29, 82F
→
09/11 14:29, , 83F
09/11 14:29, 83F
推
09/11 14:58, , 84F
09/11 14:58, 84F
→
09/14 02:39, , 85F
09/14 02:39, 85F
→
09/14 02:39, , 86F
09/14 02:39, 86F
推
09/14 02:42, , 87F
09/14 02:42, 87F
→
09/14 02:42, , 88F
09/14 02:42, 88F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):