Re: [期刊] 被打槍了~~~

看板PhD作者kenet2 (掙扎中的博班生~~)時間14年前 (2011/11/05 18:13)推噓2(2推 0噓 5→)

留言7則, 3人參與討論串2/8 (看更多)

其實我這篇已經被退一次了~~~而且這是我第一篇寫的論文我也清楚因為是第一篇其實是很生疏的~~~ 我覺得重寫一篇還比我修改這篇要來得簡單..... 可是我又不想放棄這篇的IDEA...... 也有點掙扎說到底該怎麼辦呢?這下變成雞肋了~~~~>_<...... 我還有一篇也正在審稿中本來我跟老板也蠻看好第4篇的想說這一篇比較差的如果上了就百分之百OK了沒想到還是被DECLINED了...... ※ 引述《kenet2 (掙扎中的博班生~~)》之銘言： : 除了我自己的疏忽外~~~ : 這個reviewer真的覺得我的文章寫得粉爛吧~~~~ : JPP我也已經上了兩篇了~~沒想到第3篇打擊這麼大~~~~~ : 再找別篇期刊吧~~~~~ : Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author: : Reviewer: 1 : Comments to the Author : Written English needs vast improvement. At present the grammar/language is : of an unacceptably low quality. : References. Ref 2: Herman, K. should by Krier, H. - you've got the names : backwards. Ref 3: you have a problem with the quotations. : Refs 4-8 are completely unrelated to the present work; : they are just FEM papers in different thermal stress applications. : Reference work relevant to your manuscript. : Previous work on FEM/thermal calculations and stress/thermal measurements : in rocket motors, insulators, and propellant grains. : Value. What is the value or novelty of this work? : The authors have applied a heat transfer condition to the inside of : an annulus and performed a black box ANSYS FEM calculation for the : stress distribution in the annulus. In my opinion, this is not a : publishable result but rather an undergraduate student project. : The results are not generalized for non-specific materials, : variation in motor case thickness, etc. : I see very little value in this work. The limited results are specific : to the chosen parameters : and this can be easily done by nearly anyone with ANSYS and a BS : in mechanical engineering. : Technical. What is the applied pressure on the insulator? I assume zero. : This is purely a thermal stress calculation? Why vary insulator thickness : but not also motor case thickness? Won't this influence the 0.6 cm : thickness criteria for insulator thickness? Why the sharp changes in : stress in the first 4 seconds? You should show a thermal : loading (temperature, heat flux, other) graph to explain. : But my biggest problem is that this work lacks value for nearly all readers. : This is simple black box FEM analysis on a thermally loaded annulus. : Reviewer: 2 : Comments to the Author : (There are no comments.) -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 219.70.5.61 ※ 編輯: kenet2 來自: 219.70.5.61 (11/05 18:14)

推

hint

11/05 20:09, , 1^F

11/05 20:09, 1^F

→

kenet2

11/05 22:18, , 2^F

11/05 22:18, 2^F

推

LinRungChuan

11/08 03:07, , 3^F

11/08 03:07, 3^F