Re: [問題] 碰到大問題了..
※ 引述《Ysen (永遠的蝦布)》之銘言：
: 實驗是就是有一個學長是這樣的，想要洗腦跟老師說這樣的實驗數據是不可能的...
: 他參加國內的某會議報告，報告完底下的台大教授說：你的數據是真的，你很誠實
: 甚至他發表的國際期刊，審稿的寫信來問，你的誤差怎麼這麼小，老師還是不相信
: ，他只是變成稍微相信，但是他還是認為應該不能那麼大，老師心中的標準就是源
: 自於以前學長的標準..學長因為老師這樣的要求一樣實驗作了4X次，每次重現性都
: 很高..就是因為實驗室有一個沒做數據的、一個做數據的，一個畢業了一個還苦撐
: ，他也是有所堅持，他也無奈，我看他這樣子撐，我知道我如果走下去也會像他一樣
: ，這種壓力我撐不下來，這種老師不相信你對的壓力..我承受不了...所以我才考慮
: 休學這條路>
Nobody here knows your supervisor except you.
So, you need to make decision by yourself.
My suggestion, don't lie to anybody.
That would make your world become narrower.
Although you can get your degree, probably, quicker, you will have to always
worry this for the rest of your life.
Nobody will find out? I don't think so.
Once a famous group publishes too many fake results, the chances being
found out would increase dramatically. Once someone realised your group
was lying, then they would suspect everybody in/from your group.
You can try to convince your supervisor you are right, by showing all your
proofs. However, don't spend ages to do this.
If to change his mind takes few years, I would suggest to go away and to
restart your PhD.
This sounds crazy but it is not stupid.
Suppose you have received good training in your first three years,
you probably would be able to get into some professional work immiediately.
It can still takes you another four years to get your PhD.
Nevertheless, if your current supervisor always thinks he is right and you
don't want to lie, is it possible to get your PhD finished
in another four years?
I might be wrong. However, think about it. Good luck.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 81.111.56.53
※ 編輯: lerudit 來自: 81.111.56.53 (04/30 20:27)
推
04/30 22:45, , 1F
04/30 22:45, 1F
推
05/01 08:01, , 2F
05/01 08:01, 2F
推
05/05 02:10, , 3F
05/05 02:10, 3F
推
06/13 04:34, , 4F
06/13 04:34, 4F
推
06/13 04:39, , 5F
06/13 04:39, 5F
討論串 (同標題文章)