Re: [討論] Damon asked for 20M/2Y
關於大家很關心的Granderson & Johnson V.S Damon & Matui
這裡有一篇簡單扼要的分析
http://www.itsaboutthemoney.net/2009-articles/december/so-whats-changed.html
基本上純看ops的話,不管是過去3年或5年,前者是優於後者的
雖然後者顯然對於左打比較有辦法...
但作者也指出在洋基有四位左右開攻的打者(把牛奶也算入)時這不會是問題
作者的結論是新的陣容
1. 比較強 2. 防守更好 3. 合約更漂亮(省了約一半) 4. 年輕(加起來約12歲)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 122.126.36.250
推
12/21 08:58, , 1F
12/21 08:58, 1F
→
12/21 08:59, , 2F
12/21 08:59, 2F
→
12/21 09:14, , 3F
12/21 09:14, 3F
→
12/21 09:15, , 4F
12/21 09:15, 4F
→
12/21 09:16, , 5F
12/21 09:16, 5F
推
12/21 09:55, , 6F
12/21 09:55, 6F
推
12/21 10:08, , 7F
12/21 10:08, 7F
推
12/21 12:32, , 8F
12/21 12:32, 8F
→
12/21 12:32, , 9F
12/21 12:32, 9F
→
12/21 12:33, , 10F
12/21 12:33, 10F
※ 編輯: cogi 來自: 122.126.36.250 (12/21 13:32)
推
12/21 15:14, , 11F
12/21 15:14, 11F
→
12/21 15:15, , 12F
12/21 15:15, 12F
→
12/21 15:17, , 13F
12/21 15:17, 13F
→
12/21 15:18, , 14F
12/21 15:18, 14F
→
12/21 15:19, , 15F
12/21 15:19, 15F
→
12/21 15:20, , 16F
12/21 15:20, 16F
→
12/21 15:25, , 17F
12/21 15:25, 17F
推
12/21 16:11, , 18F
12/21 16:11, 18F
→
12/21 16:25, , 19F
12/21 16:25, 19F
→
12/21 16:31, , 20F
12/21 16:31, 20F
→
12/21 16:32, , 21F
12/21 16:32, 21F
→
12/21 16:35, , 22F
12/21 16:35, 22F
→
12/21 16:53, , 23F
12/21 16:53, 23F
推
12/21 17:10, , 24F
12/21 17:10, 24F
推
12/21 17:49, , 25F
12/21 17:49, 25F
→
12/28 13:47,
5年前
, 26F
12/28 13:47, 26F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 8 之 11 篇):