Re: [討論] Damon asked for 20M/2Y
: It’s interesting that Olney notes concern about Damon’s happiness about a pay
: cut, because it’s something Brian Cashman has talked about in the past.
: Cashman has said he doesn’t believe Bobby Abreu would have come back to the
: Yankees for the same contract that eventually brought him to the Angels last
: winter. There is hesitance, Cashman said, for a player to accept a pay cut
: under any circumstances, and that hesitances grows when it involves coming back
: to his old team. It’s simply hard for the player to believe that his team
: believes his value has dipped. It might be especially true when that team has
: the highest payroll in baseball.
去年季末沒多久就搞來了Swisher,雖然當時定位不明,但是Abreu一開始就處在一個可有可
無的狀況,比Damon還可有可無...而去年對Abreu也一樣沒有提arb.
接下來的冬天補強乳摸一直環繞在Dunn,Manny...磨了半天,最後搞定Tex...
補強到這個地步可說是完成了,不管攻或守,Abreu都沒有回來的必要了.
Cashman說的話可信嗎?...我傾向解讀那是他對於天使用那種合約簽到Abreu多少有點意料
之外的說詞;而且去年的補強重點也完全不在簽回Abreu.
今年冬季會議Cashman說補強重點是"Pitching,pitching,pitching....and left field"
結果R5D搞來一個OF,然後搶了一個CF,......pitching咧?
以現在的狀況LF可以用10M左右小於2年的合約簽回Damon是有幫助的(假設不想要有太多
大約卡死的前提),明年LF讓Gardner/Melky或是Hoffman去輪的話,九棒裡面有兩個ops .700
左右的打者(LF/C)的時間會多很多.更別說還有個DH沒搞定.
在Nick Johnson合約確定之前乳摸(?)洋基開給Damon 18M/2y,LF/DH;松井 7M/1y DH.
而Damon的開價是52M/4y.
你要是真想找Damon回來的話,18M/2y的開價早就是一個大減價了,要是說擔心他回來會不
高興的話要嘛就直接答應他開的條件,要嘛你就不要開,否則這樣的行為跟Cashman去年說
過的話不是很矛盾嗎?
談合約本來就是討價還價的過程,砍價碼就算再怎麼不高興,只要答應了還是要打啊;
Pettitte也說過去年的合約他不高興也....:p
現在是敲定了Nick Johnson來打DH這個位置,沒想到Damon/Boras這個時候又不矜持了,
但是有了Nick Johnson的情況下,再花那樣的錢那樣的合約長度去簽Damon已經沒有什麼
合理的地方了,即使Damon再自動減價也一樣.
但是在Nick Johnson來之前,我還是覺得簽回Damon(最好是可以談到比一開始的價碼再低)
是比較好的.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.231.198.191
推
12/20 19:24, , 1F
12/20 19:24, 1F
※ 編輯: ninini 來自: 61.231.198.191 (12/20 19:28)
推
12/20 19:37, , 2F
12/20 19:37, 2F
→
12/20 19:38, , 3F
12/20 19:38, 3F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 11 篇):