Re: [討論] Damon asked for 20M/2Y
原文恕刪
→
12/20 12:59,
12/20 12:59
Chad Jennings 在 The LoHud Yankees Blog 發表了一篇對於 Buster 這段文字的評論
http://yankees.lhblogs.com/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
An interesting note from Buster Olney regarding Johnny Damon’s negotiations
with the Yankees.
“Part of the concern in some corners of the Yankees’ organization,” Olney
wrote, “was that in light of Damon’s initial insistence on not taking a pay
cut, he might have gone into the 2010 season very unhappy if he had surrendered
to a deal on the Yankees’ terms.”
Indications are that Damon asked for two years, $26 million. The Yankees
offered two years, $14 million. Then Damon came back with two-years, $20
million (or $22 million, depending on the version of the story). By then, the
Nick Johnson deal was done.
It’s interesting that Olney notes concern about Damon’s happiness about a pay
cut, because it’s something Brian Cashman has talked about in the past.
Cashman has said he doesn’t believe Bobby Abreu would have come back to the
Yankees for the same contract that eventually brought him to the Angels last
winter. There is hesitance, Cashman said, for a player to accept a pay cut
under any circumstances, and that hesitances grows when it involves coming back
to his old team. It’s simply hard for the player to believe that his team
believes his value has dipped. It might be especially true when that team has
the highest payroll in baseball.
Assumption seems to be that Hideki Matsui would have come back to the Yankees
for the same deal he signed with the Angels — count me in that group – but
maybe that’s not the case. And maybe Damon’s offer of a diminished contract
was made grudgingly. Not sure there’s any way to quantify those sort of
personality intangibles, but it’s worth considering.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
提供一些其他人的看法~~就讓大大參考看看囉:D
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.223.226.106
※ 編輯: genteme 來自: 61.223.226.106 (12/20 17:07)
→
12/20 17:51, , 1F
12/20 17:51, 1F
→
12/20 17:52, , 2F
12/20 17:52, 2F
推
12/20 17:57, , 3F
12/20 17:57, 3F
→
12/20 17:58, , 4F
12/20 17:58, 4F
→
12/20 17:59, , 5F
12/20 17:59, 5F
→
12/20 18:00, , 6F
12/20 18:00, 6F
→
12/20 18:02, , 7F
12/20 18:02, 7F
推
12/20 18:07, , 8F
12/20 18:07, 8F
→
12/20 18:09, , 9F
12/20 18:09, 9F
討論串 (同標題文章)