Re: [討論] 神壇上的MJ是不是不可挑戰消失
以前我覺得MJ40歲復出只是下拉生涯數據
但現在來看, 此舉只不過是再增添一筆傳奇性
為何呢? 因為自己親自走下神壇一場, 讓所有人更認識MJ這球員
說實在, 20-5-5真的只是'普通', 但問題是你要比較的標準是;
'40歲, 3年沒打球, 加入弱隊'
然後超過20-5-5, 我們可能才能稍微有點佐證地說, '這人可能贏過40歲的MJ'
這已經無關環境改變, 戰術打法, 而是這球員恐怖的本質了
別說MJ, 光曹錦輝五年沒打球上MLB, 不一定每個人都感動
但他第一球還是9x mph, 這種天賦是全世界的
而MJ更扯的是, 他用他最弱的時期, 可能是錯誤的決定
卻反過來證明他的最強, 到至今仍無解
我們無法比較公牛MJ, 但你能贏得過40歲又退休過的老MJ嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 49.215.198.72
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1526443230.A.3F9.html
→
05/16 12:02, , 1F
05/16 12:02, 1F
推
05/16 12:02, , 2F
05/16 12:02, 2F
→
05/16 12:02, , 3F
05/16 12:02, 3F
噓
05/16 12:03, , 4F
05/16 12:03, 4F
→
05/16 12:04, , 5F
05/16 12:04, 5F
→
05/16 12:04, , 6F
05/16 12:04, 6F
→
05/16 12:04, , 7F
05/16 12:04, 7F
噓
05/16 12:15, , 8F
05/16 12:15, 8F
→
05/16 12:15, , 9F
05/16 12:15, 9F
→
05/16 12:16, , 10F
05/16 12:16, 10F
推
05/16 12:36, , 11F
05/16 12:36, 11F
→
05/16 12:37, , 12F
05/16 12:37, 12F
→
05/16 12:38, , 13F
05/16 12:38, 13F
→
05/16 12:38, , 14F
05/16 12:38, 14F
推
05/16 12:53, , 15F
05/16 12:53, 15F
→
05/16 12:53, , 16F
05/16 12:53, 16F
推
05/16 13:18, , 17F
05/16 13:18, 17F
推
05/16 13:29, , 18F
05/16 13:29, 18F
推
05/16 13:42, , 19F
05/16 13:42, 19F
→
05/16 14:30, , 20F
05/16 14:30, 20F
→
05/16 14:30, , 21F
05/16 14:30, 21F
推
05/16 15:14, , 22F
05/16 15:14, 22F
→
05/16 16:11, , 23F
05/16 16:11, 23F
推
05/16 16:14, , 24F
05/16 16:14, 24F
→
05/16 16:14, , 25F
05/16 16:14, 25F
推
05/16 16:17, , 26F
05/16 16:17, 26F
推
05/16 16:40, , 27F
05/16 16:40, 27F
→
05/16 16:40, , 28F
05/16 16:40, 28F
→
05/16 16:40, , 29F
05/16 16:40, 29F
→
05/16 17:59, , 30F
05/16 17:59, 30F
→
05/16 18:00, , 31F
05/16 18:00, 31F
→
05/16 18:01, , 32F
05/16 18:01, 32F
推
05/16 18:49, , 33F
05/16 18:49, 33F
噓
05/16 19:29, , 34F
05/16 19:29, 34F
→
05/16 20:45, , 35F
05/16 20:45, 35F
→
05/16 20:49, , 36F
05/16 20:49, 36F
→
05/16 21:06, , 37F
05/16 21:06, 37F
→
05/16 21:08, , 38F
05/16 21:08, 38F
→
05/16 21:09, , 39F
05/16 21:09, 39F
→
05/16 21:10, , 40F
05/16 21:10, 40F
→
05/16 21:11, , 41F
05/16 21:11, 41F
→
05/16 21:14, , 42F
05/16 21:14, 42F
→
05/16 21:18, , 43F
05/16 21:18, 43F
→
05/16 21:39, , 44F
05/16 21:39, 44F
推
05/16 22:00, , 45F
05/16 22:00, 45F
→
05/16 22:01, , 46F
05/16 22:01, 46F
推
05/16 22:32, , 47F
05/16 22:32, 47F
推
05/17 12:20, , 48F
05/17 12:20, 48F
→
05/17 15:40, , 49F
05/17 15:40, 49F
→
05/17 15:40, , 50F
05/17 15:40, 50F
推
05/18 19:37, , 51F
05/18 19:37, 51F
→
05/18 19:37, , 52F
05/18 19:37, 52F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 13 篇):
討論
125
418
討論
25
100
討論
79
277
討論
47
218
討論
250
846
討論
60
279
討論
49
210