Re: [新聞] 林書豪末役難發揮 下季動向待考慮
: 推 orange7 : 一堆人完全不懂,當初簽這合約就是打定主意今年打出 05/02 14:01
: → orange7 : 成績就走人 05/02 14:01
Season TEAM MIN PTS FGM FGA FG% 3P% FTM FTA FT% AST STL TOV PF
2014-15 LAL 25.8 11.2 3.7 8.8 42.4 36.9 2.9 3.6 79.5 4.6 1.1 2.2 2.6
2015-16 CHA 26.3 11.7 3.8 9.3 41.2 33.6 3.1 3.7 81.5 3.0 0.7 1.9 2.1
可以看到林書豪本季在黃蜂的數據跟上一季在湖人的數據,差不了多少
並沒有什麼特別進步
大家談最多的上場時間,也沒多多少(25.8→26.3),多不到一分鐘
得分多了0.5分(11.2→11.7),命中率反而下滑(42.4%→41.2%)
三分球命中率下滑更多(36.9%→33.6%)
助攻也下滑(4.6→3.0),不過林書豪本季都打sg比較多,助攻下滑也可以理解
如果在湖人的表現只能讓他拿到年薪約200萬的合約
那本季在黃蜂的表現,跟上一季也沒差多少,憑啥能讓他拿到更好的年薪?
: → orange7 : 一個人幹翻馬刺不算打出成績嗎? 05/02 14:02
如果只看一場的表現的話
那NBA每個球員都拿打最好的那場的數據出來談合約,每個球員年薪都二千萬了
--
Bao Li Ki Si LA
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.37.65.220
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1462170227.A.7B5.html
※ 編輯: rial (114.37.65.220), 05/02/2016 14:25:33
噓
05/02 14:25, , 1F
05/02 14:25, 1F
推
05/02 14:26, , 2F
05/02 14:26, 2F
推
05/02 14:26, , 3F
05/02 14:26, 3F
→
05/02 14:27, , 4F
05/02 14:27, 4F
→
05/02 14:28, , 5F
05/02 14:28, 5F
→
05/02 14:28, , 6F
05/02 14:28, 6F
→
05/02 14:28, , 7F
05/02 14:28, 7F
→
05/02 14:29, , 8F
05/02 14:29, 8F
推
05/02 14:29, , 9F
05/02 14:29, 9F
推
05/02 14:29, , 10F
05/02 14:29, 10F
→
05/02 14:30, , 11F
05/02 14:30, 11F
噓
05/02 14:30, , 12F
05/02 14:30, 12F
噓
05/02 14:30, , 13F
05/02 14:30, 13F
→
05/02 14:30, , 14F
05/02 14:30, 14F
→
05/02 14:31, , 15F
05/02 14:31, 15F
推
05/02 14:31, , 16F
05/02 14:31, 16F
推
05/02 14:31, , 17F
05/02 14:31, 17F
→
05/02 14:31, , 18F
05/02 14:31, 18F
推
05/02 14:32, , 19F
05/02 14:32, 19F
推
05/02 14:32, , 20F
05/02 14:32, 20F
噓
05/02 14:32, , 21F
05/02 14:32, 21F
推
05/02 14:33, , 22F
05/02 14:33, 22F
噓
05/02 14:33, , 23F
05/02 14:33, 23F
→
05/02 14:33, , 24F
05/02 14:33, 24F
→
05/02 14:33, , 25F
05/02 14:33, 25F
→
05/02 14:34, , 26F
05/02 14:34, 26F
對啊。命中率下滑,三分命中率下滑更多
得分之所以增加0.5分就是靠更多出手數彌補
現在NBA球隊越來越重視三分球,林書豪三分球反而退步,這樣還想拿大合約嗎?
→
05/02 14:35, , 27F
05/02 14:35, 27F
推
05/02 14:35, , 28F
05/02 14:35, 28F
→
05/02 14:37, , 29F
05/02 14:37, 29F
推
05/02 14:38, , 30F
05/02 14:38, 30F
噓
05/02 14:39, , 31F
05/02 14:39, 31F
推
05/02 14:40, , 32F
05/02 14:40, 32F
→
05/02 14:40, , 33F
05/02 14:40, 33F
噓
05/02 14:41, , 34F
05/02 14:41, 34F
你來列啊
列一個可以大幅加薪的數據來看看
推
05/02 14:41, , 35F
05/02 14:41, 35F
→
05/02 14:41, , 36F
05/02 14:41, 36F
噓
05/02 14:41, , 37F
05/02 14:41, 37F
還有 28 則推文
還有 1 段內文
→
05/02 14:58, , 66F
05/02 14:58, 66F
→
05/02 14:58, , 67F
05/02 14:58, 67F
→
05/02 14:59, , 68F
05/02 14:59, 68F
推
05/02 14:59, , 69F
05/02 14:59, 69F
→
05/02 14:59, , 70F
05/02 14:59, 70F
→
05/02 15:00, , 71F
05/02 15:00, 71F
推
05/02 15:01, , 72F
05/02 15:01, 72F
→
05/02 15:02, , 73F
05/02 15:02, 73F
→
05/02 15:02, , 74F
05/02 15:02, 74F
好!我認錯!
正確說法應該是,這麼多球隊接洽,但可能大多數球隊,連提出合約,連出價都沒有
※ 編輯: rial (114.37.65.220), 05/02/2016 15:03:39
噓
05/02 15:05, , 75F
05/02 15:05, 75F
推
05/02 15:05, , 76F
05/02 15:05, 76F
推
05/02 15:05, , 77F
05/02 15:05, 77F
噓
05/02 15:06, , 78F
05/02 15:06, 78F
噓
05/02 15:08, , 79F
05/02 15:08, 79F
噓
05/02 15:09, , 80F
05/02 15:09, 80F
→
05/02 15:10, , 81F
05/02 15:10, 81F
推
05/02 15:12, , 82F
05/02 15:12, 82F
→
05/02 15:12, , 83F
05/02 15:12, 83F
→
05/02 15:13, , 84F
05/02 15:13, 84F
→
05/02 15:14, , 85F
05/02 15:14, 85F
噓
05/02 15:15, , 86F
05/02 15:15, 86F
噓
05/02 15:17, , 87F
05/02 15:17, 87F
→
05/02 15:18, , 88F
05/02 15:18, 88F
→
05/02 15:20, , 89F
05/02 15:20, 89F
噓
05/02 15:21, , 90F
05/02 15:21, 90F
噓
05/02 15:24, , 91F
05/02 15:24, 91F
噓
05/02 15:28, , 92F
05/02 15:28, 92F
噓
05/02 15:32, , 93F
05/02 15:32, 93F
推
05/02 15:38, , 94F
05/02 15:38, 94F
→
05/02 15:45, , 95F
05/02 15:45, 95F
噓
05/02 15:58, , 96F
05/02 15:58, 96F
推
05/02 16:03, , 97F
05/02 16:03, 97F
推
05/02 16:04, , 98F
05/02 16:04, 98F
噓
05/02 16:04, , 99F
05/02 16:04, 99F
推
05/02 16:40, , 100F
05/02 16:40, 100F
推
05/02 18:18, , 101F
05/02 18:18, 101F
噓
05/02 18:20, , 102F
05/02 18:20, 102F
噓
05/02 20:46, , 103F
05/02 20:46, 103F
推
05/02 23:57, , 104F
05/02 23:57, 104F
討論串 (同標題文章)