Re: [新聞] 林書豪末役難發揮 下季動向待考慮
※ 引述《rial (deoo)》之銘言:
: : 推 orange7 : 一堆人完全不懂,當初簽這合約就是打定主意今年打出 05/02 14:01
: : → orange7 : 成績就走人 05/02 14:01
: Season TEAM MIN PTS FGM FGA FG% 3P% FTM FTA FT% AST STL TOV PF
: 2014-15 LAL 25.8 11.2 3.7 8.8 42.4 36.9 2.9 3.6 79.5 4.6 1.1 2.2 2.6
: 2015-16 CHA 26.3 11.7 3.8 9.3 41.2 33.6 3.1 3.7 81.5 3.0 0.7 1.9 2.1
: 可以看到林書豪本季在黃蜂的數據跟上一季在湖人的數據,差不了多少
其實這才是讓人最不爽最無法接受的地方,
這樣的數據,這幾年的數據,
為何最後只有年薪兩百萬的合約,
就算不是全明星的刷分數據,
也是贏過大部分五六百萬甚至一千萬的球員
現實就是,如果去年拿不到好的合約,
今年談合約其實不會比去年好太多,
至於降薪求上場時間,那就想太多了,
工作這麼多年的心得就是薪水就是老闆對你最真實的評價
: 並沒有什麼特別進步
: 大家談最多的上場時間,也沒多多少(25.8→26.3),多不到一分鐘
: 得分多了0.5分(11.2→11.7),命中率反而下滑(42.4%→41.2%)
: 三分球命中率下滑更多(36.9%→33.6%)
: 助攻也下滑(4.6→3.0),不過林書豪本季都打sg比較多,助攻下滑也可以理解
: 如果在湖人的表現只能讓他拿到年薪約200萬的合約
: 那本季在黃蜂的表現,跟上一季也沒差多少,憑啥能讓他拿到更好的年薪?
: : → orange7 : 一個人幹翻馬刺不算打出成績嗎? 05/02 14:02
: 如果只看一場的表現的話
: 那NBA每個球員都拿打最好的那場的數據出來談合約,每個球員年薪都二千萬了
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 50.255.16.53
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1462174288.A.244.html
推
05/02 15:32, , 1F
05/02 15:32, 1F
推
05/02 15:33, , 2F
05/02 15:33, 2F
→
05/02 15:34, , 3F
05/02 15:34, 3F
推
05/02 15:35, , 4F
05/02 15:35, 4F
推
05/02 15:35, , 5F
05/02 15:35, 5F
→
05/02 15:36, , 6F
05/02 15:36, 6F
推
05/02 15:36, , 7F
05/02 15:36, 7F
推
05/02 15:37, , 8F
05/02 15:37, 8F
推
05/02 15:37, , 9F
05/02 15:37, 9F
→
05/02 15:37, , 10F
05/02 15:37, 10F
噓
05/02 15:37, , 11F
05/02 15:37, 11F
推
05/02 15:38, , 12F
05/02 15:38, 12F
→
05/02 15:38, , 13F
05/02 15:38, 13F
→
05/02 15:38, , 14F
05/02 15:38, 14F
→
05/02 15:39, , 15F
05/02 15:39, 15F
→
05/02 15:39, , 16F
05/02 15:39, 16F
推
05/02 15:40, , 17F
05/02 15:40, 17F
推
05/02 15:40, , 18F
05/02 15:40, 18F
→
05/02 15:44, , 19F
05/02 15:44, 19F
→
05/02 15:46, , 20F
05/02 15:46, 20F
推
05/02 15:47, , 21F
05/02 15:47, 21F
推
05/02 15:47, , 22F
05/02 15:47, 22F
推
05/02 15:52, , 23F
05/02 15:52, 23F
推
05/02 15:54, , 24F
05/02 15:54, 24F
推
05/02 15:55, , 25F
05/02 15:55, 25F
→
05/02 15:55, , 26F
05/02 15:55, 26F
推
05/02 15:58, , 27F
05/02 15:58, 27F
推
05/02 16:06, , 28F
05/02 16:06, 28F
→
05/02 16:07, , 29F
05/02 16:07, 29F
→
05/02 16:07, , 30F
05/02 16:07, 30F
→
05/02 16:08, , 31F
05/02 16:08, 31F
推
05/02 16:08, , 32F
05/02 16:08, 32F

→
05/02 16:16, , 33F
05/02 16:16, 33F
推
05/02 16:17, , 34F
05/02 16:17, 34F
推
05/02 16:22, , 35F
05/02 16:22, 35F
→
05/02 16:22, , 36F
05/02 16:22, 36F
→
05/02 16:23, , 37F
05/02 16:23, 37F
→
05/02 16:23, , 38F
05/02 16:23, 38F
→
05/02 16:23, , 39F
05/02 16:23, 39F
→
05/02 16:24, , 40F
05/02 16:24, 40F
→
05/02 16:24, , 41F
05/02 16:24, 41F
→
05/02 16:24, , 42F
05/02 16:24, 42F
→
05/02 16:25, , 43F
05/02 16:25, 43F
推
05/02 16:26, , 44F
05/02 16:26, 44F
→
05/02 16:26, , 45F
05/02 16:26, 45F
推
05/02 16:27, , 46F
05/02 16:27, 46F
→
05/02 16:28, , 47F
05/02 16:28, 47F
→
05/02 16:29, , 48F
05/02 16:29, 48F
→
05/02 16:31, , 49F
05/02 16:31, 49F
推
05/02 16:32, , 50F
05/02 16:32, 50F
推
05/02 16:32, , 51F
05/02 16:32, 51F
→
05/02 16:33, , 52F
05/02 16:33, 52F
噓
05/02 16:35, , 53F
05/02 16:35, 53F
推
05/02 16:39, , 54F
05/02 16:39, 54F
→
05/02 16:42, , 55F
05/02 16:42, 55F
噓
05/02 16:43, , 56F
05/02 16:43, 56F
推
05/02 16:50, , 57F
05/02 16:50, 57F
推
05/02 16:54, , 58F
05/02 16:54, 58F
→
05/02 16:55, , 59F
05/02 16:55, 59F
→
05/02 16:55, , 60F
05/02 16:55, 60F
推
05/02 16:56, , 61F
05/02 16:56, 61F
→
05/02 17:07, , 62F
05/02 17:07, 62F
推
05/02 17:15, , 63F
05/02 17:15, 63F
推
05/02 17:32, , 64F
05/02 17:32, 64F
→
05/02 17:35, , 65F
05/02 17:35, 65F
→
05/02 17:35, , 66F
05/02 17:35, 66F
→
05/02 17:35, , 67F
05/02 17:35, 67F
→
05/02 17:35, , 68F
05/02 17:35, 68F
→
05/02 17:36, , 69F
05/02 17:36, 69F
噓
05/02 20:00, , 70F
05/02 20:00, 70F
→
05/02 20:00, , 71F
05/02 20:00, 71F
→
05/02 20:00, , 72F
05/02 20:00, 72F
推
05/02 20:04, , 73F
05/02 20:04, 73F
噓
05/02 21:29, , 74F
05/02 21:29, 74F
噓
05/03 02:51, , 75F
05/03 02:51, 75F
討論串 (同標題文章)