Re: [情報] Thomas談全明星:望教練給機會
1.你好,我是Lin迷
2.至今我沒戰過或酸過IT
3.搞清楚一個觀念:Hate the game,dont hate the player.
就拿當初火箭開給Lin的那張25M/3Y,被稱為毒藥合約而引起討論的例子來說
你可以去質疑現行薪資規定容許這樣形式的合約出現是否有問題該檢討,
但若是去檢討球員那就是你有問題,畢竟
合約是照著規則去簽來的,高薪大約是球隊自己願意給的,
遊戲規則有問題那就該去質疑遊戲規則,而不是按規則走玩家.
同樣的,今天覺得明星賽的投票機制有問題,那你就該去質疑這規則
把其他球員拖下水的發言方式本來就很讓人感冒,人家是惹你了耶?
再者,Lin有對此有何想法我們不知道,但我認為
投票給Lin的球迷是有權可以不爽的,你質疑球員的得票數
那相對來說不等於是質疑球迷的投票選擇?
而球迷的選擇,當然是球迷自己爽就行了,又輪的到誰來有意見?
明星賽說穿了不過就每年一次的NBA祭典,球迷也不過湊湊熱鬧參與一下投票
難道也得搞得跟4年立委選舉一樣去看數據看政見然後再來決定要投誰?
IT本就屬於公眾人物,發言本來就得謹慎
明星賽都辦幾十年了,每年都有遺珠,每年都有人在嘴制度是否足夠公平
但這樣球員點名球員的發言,IT還真是第一個.
我記得老巴還是誰也是有質疑過球員的得票數的樣子
但他是球評,有些事情旁人可以嘴,但球員間則該懂得閉上嘴巴互相尊重.
例如薪資 例如明星賽票數.
先不說這幾天在板上酸IT的有那些ID,是Lin迷還是非Lin迷
但這次明顯就是IT自己失言,被酸個幾句不也是剛好而已?
對他人的得票數有意見,那他人自然也可以對你的入選資格有意見
不是嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.167.131.21
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1455843084.A.B5E.html
推
02/19 08:53, , 1F
02/19 08:53, 1F
推
02/19 08:54, , 2F
02/19 08:54, 2F
→
02/19 08:54, , 3F
02/19 08:54, 3F
推
02/19 08:54, , 4F
02/19 08:54, 4F
→
02/19 08:56, , 5F
02/19 08:56, 5F
推
02/19 08:57, , 6F
02/19 08:57, 6F
推
02/19 08:58, , 7F
02/19 08:58, 7F
推
02/19 08:59, , 8F
02/19 08:59, 8F
推
02/19 09:00, , 9F
02/19 09:00, 9F
→
02/19 09:00, , 10F
02/19 09:00, 10F
推
02/19 09:01, , 11F
02/19 09:01, 11F
推
02/19 09:01, , 12F
02/19 09:01, 12F
推
02/19 09:02, , 13F
02/19 09:02, 13F
推
02/19 09:02, , 14F
02/19 09:02, 14F
→
02/19 09:04, , 15F
02/19 09:04, 15F
→
02/19 09:04, , 16F
02/19 09:04, 16F
推
02/19 09:04, , 17F
02/19 09:04, 17F
推
02/19 09:04, , 18F
02/19 09:04, 18F
推
02/19 09:06, , 19F
02/19 09:06, 19F
推
02/19 09:06, , 20F
02/19 09:06, 20F
→
02/19 09:06, , 21F
02/19 09:06, 21F
推
02/19 09:07, , 22F
02/19 09:07, 22F
推
02/19 09:08, , 23F
02/19 09:08, 23F
推
02/19 09:09, , 24F
02/19 09:09, 24F
推
02/19 09:10, , 25F
02/19 09:10, 25F
推
02/19 09:12, , 26F
02/19 09:12, 26F
推
02/19 09:13, , 27F
02/19 09:13, 27F
推
02/19 09:15, , 28F
02/19 09:15, 28F
→
02/19 09:15, , 29F
02/19 09:15, 29F
推
02/19 09:16, , 30F
02/19 09:16, 30F
推
02/19 09:17, , 31F
02/19 09:17, 31F
→
02/19 09:17, , 32F
02/19 09:17, 32F
推
02/19 09:17, , 33F
02/19 09:17, 33F
噓
02/19 09:18, , 34F
02/19 09:18, 34F
推
02/19 09:19, , 35F
02/19 09:19, 35F
噓
02/19 09:20, , 36F
02/19 09:20, 36F
推
02/19 09:21, , 37F
02/19 09:21, 37F
噓
02/19 09:23, , 38F
02/19 09:23, 38F
推
02/19 09:23, , 39F
02/19 09:23, 39F
還有 398 則推文
推
02/19 12:55, , 438F
02/19 12:55, 438F
推
02/19 12:55, , 439F
02/19 12:55, 439F
推
02/19 12:55, , 440F
02/19 12:55, 440F
→
02/19 12:56, , 441F
02/19 12:56, 441F
推
02/19 13:06, , 442F
02/19 13:06, 442F
推
02/19 13:07, , 443F
02/19 13:07, 443F
推
02/19 13:11, , 444F
02/19 13:11, 444F
→
02/19 13:23, , 445F
02/19 13:23, 445F
推
02/19 13:26, , 446F
02/19 13:26, 446F
→
02/19 13:26, , 447F
02/19 13:26, 447F
推
02/19 13:43, , 448F
02/19 13:43, 448F
推
02/19 13:52, , 449F
02/19 13:52, 449F
推
02/19 13:56, , 450F
02/19 13:56, 450F
推
02/19 13:59, , 451F
02/19 13:59, 451F
推
02/19 13:59, , 452F
02/19 13:59, 452F
→
02/19 13:59, , 453F
02/19 13:59, 453F
推
02/19 14:13, , 454F
02/19 14:13, 454F
→
02/19 14:13, , 455F
02/19 14:13, 455F
推
02/19 14:17, , 456F
02/19 14:17, 456F
→
02/19 14:18, , 457F
02/19 14:18, 457F
→
02/19 14:18, , 458F
02/19 14:18, 458F
推
02/19 14:56, , 459F
02/19 14:56, 459F
推
02/19 14:58, , 460F
02/19 14:58, 460F
推
02/19 15:12, , 461F
02/19 15:12, 461F
→
02/19 15:14, , 462F
02/19 15:14, 462F
推
02/19 15:18, , 463F
02/19 15:18, 463F
推
02/19 15:23, , 464F
02/19 15:23, 464F
→
02/19 15:23, , 465F
02/19 15:23, 465F
→
02/19 15:23, , 466F
02/19 15:23, 466F
推
02/19 15:33, , 467F
02/19 15:33, 467F
推
02/19 15:35, , 468F
02/19 15:35, 468F
→
02/19 15:35, , 469F
02/19 15:35, 469F
推
02/19 15:37, , 470F
02/19 15:37, 470F
→
02/19 15:37, , 471F
02/19 15:37, 471F
推
02/19 15:52, , 472F
02/19 15:52, 472F
推
02/19 16:54, , 473F
02/19 16:54, 473F
推
02/19 17:01, , 474F
02/19 17:01, 474F
推
02/19 18:37, , 475F
02/19 18:37, 475F
推
02/19 18:53, , 476F
02/19 18:53, 476F
推
02/19 18:54, , 477F
02/19 18:54, 477F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 3 篇):
情報
-73
271