大家不知道有沒有覺得,每次搭橘線都會覺得播廣播的時間很早?
這個從年初就開始試辦,愈計年底後其他高運量系統也會改成這樣,
猜綠線會是第二個實施的,不知大家對這樣改的感覺如何?
個人是覺得還不錯啦!能讓乘客提早準備,
人多的時候也不用怕來不及,不過如果能加個開頭,
或許感覺上比較不會覺得太早。
例:即將抵達,三重,或是:下一站,三重。
另外想聊一下國外的廣播方式,有些會習慣在前面加上Next stop 或是Next station,是因為英語習慣冠詞的緣故嗎?
不知西方語言中會不會像北捷直接講站名而省略前後的部份,還是一定要有個開頭才可以。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.161.131.94
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MRT/M.1413128633.A.061.html
→
10/12 23:52, , 1F
10/12 23:52, 1F
→
10/12 23:53, , 2F
10/12 23:53, 2F
推
10/12 23:54, , 3F
10/12 23:54, 3F
→
10/12 23:57, , 4F
10/12 23:57, 4F
→
10/12 23:57, , 5F
10/12 23:57, 5F
推
10/12 23:58, , 6F
10/12 23:58, 6F
→
10/12 23:58, , 7F
10/12 23:58, 7F
推
10/13 00:17, , 8F
10/13 00:17, 8F
→
10/13 00:18, , 9F
10/13 00:18, 9F
→
10/13 00:19, , 10F
10/13 00:19, 10F
→
10/13 02:11, , 11F
10/13 02:11, 11F
→
10/13 02:13, , 12F
10/13 02:13, 12F
→
10/13 02:13, , 13F
10/13 02:13, 13F
→
10/13 02:14, , 14F
10/13 02:14, 14F
→
10/13 02:15, , 15F
10/13 02:15, 15F
→
10/13 02:16, , 16F
10/13 02:16, 16F
→
10/13 02:17, , 17F
10/13 02:17, 17F
→
10/13 02:18, , 18F
10/13 02:18, 18F
→
10/13 02:20, , 19F
10/13 02:20, 19F
→
10/13 02:20, , 20F
10/13 02:20, 20F
→
10/13 02:21, , 21F
10/13 02:21, 21F
推
10/13 07:26, , 22F
10/13 07:26, 22F
→
10/13 09:38, , 23F
10/13 09:38, 23F
→
10/13 16:26, , 24F
10/13 16:26, 24F
→
10/13 16:26, , 25F
10/13 16:26, 25F
→
10/14 00:20, , 26F
10/14 00:20, 26F
→
10/14 00:38, , 27F
10/14 00:38, 27F
→
10/14 00:38, , 28F
10/14 00:38, 28F
→
10/14 00:39, , 29F
10/14 00:39, 29F
→
10/14 01:04, , 30F
10/14 01:04, 30F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):