Re: [外絮] Machi:我們有我們的建軍哲學消失
: TPA在S2世界第一,結果S3的待遇有比TSM好嗎?
: 所謂的優秀人才是指丁特、殺死蓋這種?
: 更別說TSM是一個世界知名品牌,Machi搞不好只是地方雜牌,雙方的策略本
: 來就不可能會相同。
: 大哥講的這些經營理念,其實也沒太大問題。這種公司現實也是一大堆,起
: 薪超低然後靠業績加給,只是Machi的選手達不到業績而已。
: 最主要還是之前的關係,讓鄉民黑Machi黑到現在而已。不是每個人都跟蟹老
: 闆一樣,願意賠錢在做,還願意開飲料店幫選手顧生路的。放眼全球,也只有
: 蟹老闆一個做到這樣而已。
: 看看其他台灣的隊伍,似乎也不符合文章內所提到的
: 『進去不但是錢多、也有名聲、生活環境等等都非常好。』
: 要拿台灣環境跟國外比,真的是有點太苛刻了。
我覺得你這有點慣老闆的心態
台灣現在環境確實不好,但是MACHI這樣的做法就是幫凶
你說TSM是世界名牌,MACHI是地攤牌
是什麼造成這樣的差別?
如果MACHI現在馬上開出跟TSM一樣的待遇,難道不會馬上變世界名牌嗎?
大環境不好不是跟著沉淪的理由
你繼續把待遇壓低難道有天環境就會自己變好了嗎?
如果大家都很能接受這樣的待遇的話只會繼續沉淪吧?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 120.126.64.49
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/LoL/M.1413275809.A.77B.html
噓
10/14 16:39, , 1F
10/14 16:39, 1F
在電競的世界裡不見得需要 只要網羅知名選手就可以了
→
10/14 16:39, , 2F
10/14 16:39, 2F
→
10/14 16:39, , 3F
10/14 16:39, 3F
推
10/14 16:40, , 4F
10/14 16:40, 4F
推
10/14 16:40, , 5F
10/14 16:40, 5F
→
10/14 16:40, , 6F
10/14 16:40, 6F
→
10/14 16:41, , 7F
10/14 16:41, 7F
人氣有知名選手就行了 重點還是回到待遇 有好的待遇選手就會來
至於TPA我不知道你提他幹嘛
我也不覺得他作為一個隊伍對電靜的貢獻有比MACHI好多少
→
10/14 16:42, , 8F
10/14 16:42, 8F
※ 編輯: s9402010919 (120.126.64.49), 10/14/2014 16:45:50
→
10/14 16:43, , 9F
10/14 16:43, 9F
不見得 但MACHI現在是花底薪組五個能力值60的 會拿冠軍?
→
10/14 16:43, , 10F
10/14 16:43, 10F
推
10/14 16:46, , 11F
10/14 16:46, 11F
→
10/14 16:46, , 12F
10/14 16:46, 12F
→
10/14 16:46, , 13F
10/14 16:46, 13F
沒錯 重點就是經營
推
10/14 16:47, , 14F
10/14 16:47, 14F
噓
10/14 16:48, , 15F
10/14 16:48, 15F
你給的出MLB的薪水就可以有MLB的球員來CPBL 會不有名?
→
10/14 16:48, , 16F
10/14 16:48, 16F
→
10/14 16:49, , 17F
10/14 16:49, 17F
我覺得都是
※ 編輯: s9402010919 (120.126.64.49), 10/14/2014 16:50:39
→
10/14 16:49, , 18F
10/14 16:49, 18F
推
10/14 16:50, , 19F
10/14 16:50, 19F
→
10/14 16:50, , 20F
10/14 16:50, 20F
→
10/14 16:50, , 21F
10/14 16:50, 21F
→
10/14 16:51, , 22F
10/14 16:51, 22F
→
10/14 16:51, , 23F
10/14 16:51, 23F
→
10/14 16:52, , 24F
10/14 16:52, 24F
→
10/14 16:53, , 25F
10/14 16:53, 25F
→
10/14 16:53, , 26F
10/14 16:53, 26F
推
10/14 16:55, , 27F
10/14 16:55, 27F
推
10/14 16:55, , 28F
10/14 16:55, 28F
→
10/14 16:55, , 29F
10/14 16:55, 29F
→
10/14 16:56, , 30F
10/14 16:56, 30F
→
10/14 16:57, , 31F
10/14 16:57, 31F
→
10/14 16:58, , 32F
10/14 16:58, 32F
→
10/14 16:58, , 33F
10/14 16:58, 33F
推
10/14 16:59, , 34F
10/14 16:59, 34F
→
10/14 16:59, , 35F
10/14 16:59, 35F
→
10/14 16:59, , 36F
10/14 16:59, 36F
→
10/14 17:00, , 37F
10/14 17:00, 37F
→
10/14 17:00, , 38F
10/14 17:00, 38F
噓
10/14 17:00, , 39F
10/14 17:00, 39F
→
10/14 17:00, , 40F
10/14 17:00, 40F
→
10/14 17:00, , 41F
10/14 17:00, 41F
→
10/14 17:02, , 42F
10/14 17:02, 42F
→
10/14 17:02, , 43F
10/14 17:02, 43F
→
10/14 17:02, , 44F
10/14 17:02, 44F
推
10/14 17:03, , 45F
10/14 17:03, 45F
→
10/14 17:03, , 46F
10/14 17:03, 46F
→
10/14 17:04, , 47F
10/14 17:04, 47F
→
10/14 17:07, , 48F
10/14 17:07, 48F
噓
10/14 17:07, , 49F
10/14 17:07, 49F
→
10/14 17:08, , 50F
10/14 17:08, 50F
推
10/14 17:08, , 51F
10/14 17:08, 51F
→
10/14 17:08, , 52F
10/14 17:08, 52F
→
10/14 17:08, , 53F
10/14 17:08, 53F
→
10/14 17:08, , 54F
10/14 17:08, 54F
→
10/14 17:09, , 55F
10/14 17:09, 55F
→
10/14 17:10, , 56F
10/14 17:10, 56F
推
10/14 17:17, , 57F
10/14 17:17, 57F
→
10/14 17:18, , 58F
10/14 17:18, 58F
→
10/14 17:18, , 59F
10/14 17:18, 59F
→
10/14 17:19, , 60F
10/14 17:19, 60F
推
10/14 17:25, , 61F
10/14 17:25, 61F
→
10/14 17:27, , 62F
10/14 17:27, 62F
噓
10/14 18:20, , 63F
10/14 18:20, 63F
噓
10/14 20:04, , 64F
10/14 20:04, 64F
→
10/14 20:04, , 65F
10/14 20:04, 65F
討論串 (同標題文章)