Re: [閒聊] 強度比較
: 父兼有給出相對強度,參考比斯吉畫給奇牙的圖(在18.19集左右)
: 我可沒說"絕對強度"喔
: 目前出現人物,我覺得強度比:(以漫畫為依據)
: 螞蟻篇:
: 1.王 > 會長 > 三護衛、莫老五、(諾布實在太虛了,排不下去) > 凱特
: 2.莫老五、凱特、旅團 > 蟻師團長
會長比三護衛弱,我不認為會長能夠被莫老五三個圍攻還毫髮無傷
強度應該是這樣
王=三護衛(以目前的情報看來還是把這四隻擺在同一個等級比較好)>會長>=凱特>莫老五
: GI篇:
: 磊札 > 比斯吉、旅團
: GI篇和螞蟻篇的人不太能由漫畫比,
: 畢竟很多新的構想似乎是螞蟻篇才出來的
: 不過假設整體結構是一樣的話,磊札大概可以排在三護衛那區
奇犽已經說了
尼菲彼多的強度比他所見過的任何人都可怕,甚至超越西索和他哥哥。
所以雷札應該是在三護衛軍之下。
我不認為雷札會強到讓凱特直冒冷汗
有一點是確定的,那就是這四隻螞蟻被富堅設定的是不同層次的強..
如果他們和人類一樣 ,討伐軍大可正面突破..
就是因為他們知道正面打是絕對沒有勝算 所以才會想出一堆怪招想要牽制護衛軍的行動
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 220.136.86.215
※ 編輯: billloung 來自: 220.136.86.215 (12/09 13:40)
推
12/09 13:42, , 1F
12/09 13:42, 1F
推
12/09 13:58, , 2F
12/09 13:58, 2F
→
12/09 13:59, , 3F
12/09 13:59, 3F
推
12/09 14:04, , 4F
12/09 14:04, 4F
推
12/09 14:24, , 5F
12/09 14:24, 5F
→
12/09 14:25, , 6F
12/09 14:25, 6F
推
12/09 14:25, , 7F
12/09 14:25, 7F
推
12/09 14:32, , 8F
12/09 14:32, 8F
→
12/09 14:34, , 9F
12/09 14:34, 9F
推
12/09 15:10, , 10F
12/09 15:10, 10F
推
12/09 15:25, , 11F
12/09 15:25, 11F
→
12/09 15:26, , 12F
12/09 15:26, 12F
→
12/09 15:27, , 13F
12/09 15:27, 13F
→
12/09 15:29, , 14F
12/09 15:29, 14F
→
12/09 15:31, , 15F
12/09 15:31, 15F
→
12/09 15:32, , 16F
12/09 15:32, 16F
→
12/09 15:32, , 17F
12/09 15:32, 17F
→
12/09 15:34, , 18F
12/09 15:34, 18F
推
12/09 15:35, , 19F
12/09 15:35, 19F
→
12/09 15:36, , 20F
12/09 15:36, 20F
推
12/09 15:37, , 21F
12/09 15:37, 21F
→
12/09 15:37, , 22F
12/09 15:37, 22F
→
12/09 15:37, , 23F
12/09 15:37, 23F
→
12/09 15:39, , 24F
12/09 15:39, 24F
→
12/09 15:41, , 25F
12/09 15:41, 25F
→
12/09 15:42, , 26F
12/09 15:42, 26F
→
12/09 15:42, , 27F
12/09 15:42, 27F
→
12/09 15:43, , 28F
12/09 15:43, 28F
→
12/09 15:44, , 29F
12/09 15:44, 29F
→
12/09 15:45, , 30F
12/09 15:45, 30F
推
12/09 15:46, , 31F
12/09 15:46, 31F
→
12/09 15:47, , 32F
12/09 15:47, 32F
→
12/09 15:48, , 33F
12/09 15:48, 33F
→
12/09 15:48, , 34F
12/09 15:48, 34F
→
12/09 15:49, , 35F
12/09 15:49, 35F
→
12/09 15:49, , 36F
12/09 15:49, 36F
推
12/09 15:53, , 37F
12/09 15:53, 37F
→
12/09 15:55, , 38F
12/09 15:55, 38F
→
12/09 15:57, , 39F
12/09 15:57, 39F
→
12/09 15:57, , 40F
12/09 15:57, 40F
→
12/09 15:58, , 41F
12/09 15:58, 41F
→
12/09 15:59, , 42F
12/09 15:59, 42F
→
12/09 16:01, , 43F
12/09 16:01, 43F
→
12/09 16:03, , 44F
12/09 16:03, 44F
→
12/09 16:04, , 45F
12/09 16:04, 45F
→
12/09 16:04, , 46F
12/09 16:04, 46F
→
12/09 16:04, , 47F
12/09 16:04, 47F
→
12/09 16:05, , 48F
12/09 16:05, 48F
推
12/09 16:06, , 49F
12/09 16:06, 49F
→
12/09 16:06, , 50F
12/09 16:06, 50F
→
12/09 16:07, , 51F
12/09 16:07, 51F
→
12/09 16:08, , 52F
12/09 16:08, 52F
→
12/09 16:09, , 53F
12/09 16:09, 53F
→
12/09 16:11, , 54F
12/09 16:11, 54F
→
12/09 16:12, , 55F
12/09 16:12, 55F
→
12/09 16:14, , 56F
12/09 16:14, 56F
→
12/09 16:16, , 57F
12/09 16:16, 57F
推
12/09 16:19, , 58F
12/09 16:19, 58F
→
12/09 16:19, , 59F
12/09 16:19, 59F
→
12/09 16:20, , 60F
12/09 16:20, 60F
→
12/09 16:24, , 61F
12/09 16:24, 61F
→
12/09 16:26, , 62F
12/09 16:26, 62F
推
12/09 16:30, , 63F
12/09 16:30, 63F
→
12/09 16:33, , 64F
12/09 16:33, 64F
推
12/09 16:34, , 65F
12/09 16:34, 65F
推
12/09 16:37, , 66F
12/09 16:37, 66F
推
12/09 16:43, , 67F
12/09 16:43, 67F
→
12/09 16:45, , 68F
12/09 16:45, 68F
推
12/09 17:01, , 69F
12/09 17:01, 69F
→
12/09 17:02, , 70F
12/09 17:02, 70F
推
12/09 18:27, , 71F
12/09 18:27, 71F
推
12/09 18:34, , 72F
12/09 18:34, 72F
→
12/09 18:35, , 73F
12/09 18:35, 73F
→
12/09 18:35, , 74F
12/09 18:35, 74F
推
12/09 19:08, , 75F
12/09 19:08, 75F
→
12/09 21:01, , 76F
12/09 21:01, 76F
噓
12/09 21:15, , 77F
12/09 21:15, 77F
推
12/09 21:35, , 78F
12/09 21:35, 78F
→
12/09 22:35, , 79F
12/09 22:35, 79F
→
12/09 23:33, , 80F
12/09 23:33, 80F
推
12/09 23:42, , 81F
12/09 23:42, 81F
推
12/10 00:43, , 82F
12/10 00:43, 82F
→
12/10 03:18, , 83F
12/10 03:18, 83F
推
12/10 04:49, , 84F
12/10 04:49, 84F
推
12/10 09:51, , 85F
12/10 09:51, 85F
噓
12/11 03:15, , 86F
12/11 03:15, 86F
推
12/11 19:48, , 87F
12/11 19:48, 87F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 19 篇):
閒聊
21
69
閒聊
26
87
閒聊
6
28
閒聊
27
42
閒聊
1
8
閒聊
5
10
閒聊
7
12
閒聊
2
2
閒聊
8
13
閒聊
4
6