Re: [新聞] 陳珮琪稱台灣發函世衛示警太牽強 陳時中：沒法強迫大家都看懂
※ 引述《A6 (短ID真好)》之銘言：
: ※ 引述《hito0509 (永不放棄！！)》之銘言：
: News resource today indicate that at least seven atypical pneumonia cases
: were reported in Wuhan, CHINA. Their health authorities replied to the media
: that the cases were believed not SARS; however the sample are still under
: examination, and cases have been isolated for treatment.
: I would greatly appreciate it if you have relevant information to share with
: us.
: Thank you very much in advance for your attention to this mattter.
: Best Regards.
News reource today indicates that a Taiwanese doctor is suspected of illegal
Organ transplantation in China. The authorities replied to the media that the
cases were beleived not the truth. However several evidence is still under
examination, and the doctor mentioned the price of surgery in a book, The
Slaughter.
I would greatly appreciate it if you have relevatn information to share with
us.
Thank you very much in advance for your attention to this matters.
Best Regards,
不知道這信看起來像是意有所指，還是單純詢問？
我用同樣的語法，但背景明顯有誤的事件來寫。
我相信下面推文又會開始偏題亂罵了，
我是100%相信這位醫生不會進行這件事，
我只是單純想用這位醫生的這件事情，
來情境模擬發一封信，看看信看起來像是詢問，還是意有所指。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 202.86.119.161 (澳大利亞)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1590916071.A.EB1.html
→
05/31 17:08,
3年前
, 1F
05/31 17:08, 1F
→
05/31 17:10,
3年前
, 2F
05/31 17:10, 2F
重點是同樣的語法，
我相信有人會說那只是單純詢問，
但是被套到這種抹黑的信件就又會說成意有所指...
噓
05/31 17:12,
3年前
, 3F
05/31 17:12, 3F
推
05/31 17:13,
3年前
, 4F
05/31 17:13, 4F
推
05/31 17:13,
3年前
, 5F
05/31 17:13, 5F
推
05/31 17:13,
3年前
, 6F
05/31 17:13, 6F
其實我真得覺得沒必要這樣，
但是...原文那封信，你如果是有關單位你根本應該要警覺了。
However, the sample are still under examination, and cases have been isolated
for treatment.
這句話是很重的轉折，在敘述事實與前句可能有嚴重衝突；
你如果是有關單位...你不在乎 只能說你欠電吧。
→
05/31 17:15,
3年前
, 7F
05/31 17:15, 7F
→
05/31 17:16,
3年前
, 8F
05/31 17:16, 8F
陳時中一直都民進黨的官不是嗎？不太懂你這句的意思
然後那封信本來就是一封 高度懷疑加警告 的用意啊。
怎麼看都是...
→
05/31 17:21,
3年前
, 9F
05/31 17:21, 9F
→
05/31 17:21,
3年前
, 10F
05/31 17:21, 10F
警告中共可能發生 SARS
不等於警告有人傳人？
→
05/31 17:23,
3年前
, 11F
05/31 17:23, 11F
→
05/31 17:24,
3年前
, 12F
05/31 17:24, 12F
→
05/31 17:24,
3年前
, 13F
05/31 17:24, 13F
→
05/31 17:28,
3年前
, 14F
05/31 17:28, 14F
→
05/31 17:29,
3年前
, 15F
05/31 17:29, 15F
→
05/31 17:30,
3年前
, 16F
05/31 17:30, 16F
→
05/31 17:34,
3年前
, 17F
05/31 17:34, 17F
→
05/31 17:36,
3年前
, 18F
05/31 17:36, 18F
→
05/31 17:38,
3年前
, 19F
05/31 17:38, 19F
→
05/31 18:15,
3年前
, 20F
05/31 18:15, 20F
however the sample are still under examination, and cases have been isolated
for treatment.
ISOLATED -> 沒有傳染風險為什麼需要？
→
05/31 19:24,
3年前
, 21F
05/31 19:24, 21F
→
05/31 19:24,
3年前
, 22F
05/31 19:24, 22F
所以囉...這不就是在警告了嗎= =
中國說 不是 SARS 沒有人傳人風險
但是現有病患全部隔離...
這句話是不是很衝突？是不是該提高警覺？
→
05/31 20:18,
3年前
, 23F
05/31 20:18, 23F
所以...這不是在警告了？
中國號稱沒有人傳人，但是實際上狀況應該是未知且可疑傳染病。
※ 編輯: deepinheart (202.86.119.236 澳大利亞), 05/31/2020 21:00:19
討論串 (同標題文章)