[新聞] 台電人員:賴院長,供電策略互相矛盾,消失
楊家法/台電基層配電技術員、綠學院綠色帶路人、氣候先鋒者聯盟共同發起人日前賴清德院長親自在行政院召開「行政院排除產業投資障礙穩定供電策略」記者會。簡單的來講就是三招(預計要9000億元):多元創能,積極節能,靈活調度。
但是第一招會打到第三招,這個政府有想過嗎?假設一個情境:2025年,在某個風和日麗的冬天上午,PV太陽能有20GW,約有3小時可以持續有15~17GW輸出毫無問題;風力裝置容量有4GW,那白天也常有2~3GW(冬天風場很好)。易言之,冬天白天會有某一天的一個時段──假設是2小時,風光相加是17~20GW,而其他幾乎由高碳排火力來補(約9GW),但是突然來了不可抗拒的天氣變化,太陽能發電短時間內受到起伏影響,會如何?一般來說在系統突喪失供電能力 3.4%時會「降頻至
59.5Hz」,只要50秒沒有電力補上,系統會自動跳脫(停電)。提供一個環境背景參考:台灣目前用電需求:夏天36GW,冬天26GW;36GW 的
3.4%相當1.2GW,26GW的3.4%相當0.89GW,意即目前台灣的電力系統能負荷的突發電力起伏(在0.89~1.2GW),超過這個,低頻就馬上拉警報!!我們不禁要問:有任何人有能力把風力和太陽能,將其15分鐘或30分鐘起伏保證控制在6%以內嗎?這種事根本不可能保證,那試問系統怎辦?第一招多元創能就和第三招靈活調度衝突了,要如何是好?蔡總統曾告訴大家,保證不缺電。而過去行政院長,經濟部長及能源局長都說過類似的話。現在似乎賴院長有察覺,在電力供應緊迫下,缺電是有可能發生的。過去政策只強調能源轉型,強調非核後的各種能源占比(發電度數)目標。但就算ꔊ悧~度發電度數達標,或月發電度數達標,並不代表某一天不會缺電,這オ是專業的思考。9000億元不是小數目,這可是全民血汗錢。能源選擇要由專業討論,而非為成就政治的犧牲品。
https://tw.appledaily.com/new/realtime/20171110/1238785/?utm_source=Line&utm_medium=MWeb_Share&utm_campaign=https%3A%2F%2Ftw.appledaily.com%2Fnew%2Frealtime%2F20171110%2F1238785%2F
========================
說人話我聽不懂啦!
-----
Sent from JPTT on my Sony D6653.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.82.77.166
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1510322819.A.301.html
→
11/10 22:07, , 1F
11/10 22:07, 1F
噓
11/10 22:07, , 2F
11/10 22:07, 2F
推
11/10 22:07, , 3F
11/10 22:07, 3F
→
11/10 22:07, , 4F
11/10 22:07, 4F
→
11/10 22:08, , 5F
11/10 22:08, 5F
噓
11/10 22:08, , 6F
11/10 22:08, 6F
推
11/10 22:08, , 7F
11/10 22:08, 7F
→
11/10 22:08, , 8F
11/10 22:08, 8F
噓
11/10 22:09, , 9F
11/10 22:09, 9F
噓
11/10 22:09, , 10F
11/10 22:09, 10F
噓
11/10 22:09, , 11F
11/10 22:09, 11F
→
11/10 22:09, , 12F
11/10 22:09, 12F
→
11/10 22:10, , 13F
11/10 22:10, 13F
→
11/10 22:11, , 14F
11/10 22:11, 14F
→
11/10 22:11, , 15F
11/10 22:11, 15F
→
11/10 22:11, , 16F
11/10 22:11, 16F
→
11/10 22:11, , 17F
11/10 22:11, 17F
推
11/10 22:11, , 18F
11/10 22:11, 18F
→
11/10 22:11, , 19F
11/10 22:11, 19F
推
11/10 22:12, , 20F
11/10 22:12, 20F
→
11/10 22:13, , 21F
11/10 22:13, 21F
→
11/10 22:13, , 22F
11/10 22:13, 22F
推
11/10 22:14, , 23F
11/10 22:14, 23F
推
11/10 22:14, , 24F
11/10 22:14, 24F
→
11/10 22:16, , 25F
11/10 22:16, 25F
推
11/10 22:17, , 26F
11/10 22:17, 26F
→
11/10 22:18, , 27F
11/10 22:18, 27F
→
11/10 22:19, , 28F
11/10 22:19, 28F
推
11/10 22:19, , 29F
11/10 22:19, 29F
→
11/10 22:19, , 30F
11/10 22:19, 30F
→
11/10 22:19, , 31F
11/10 22:19, 31F
→
11/10 22:22, , 32F
11/10 22:22, 32F
推
11/10 22:24, , 33F
11/10 22:24, 33F
推
11/10 22:27, , 34F
11/10 22:27, 34F
推
11/10 22:28, , 35F
11/10 22:28, 35F
→
11/10 22:29, , 36F
11/10 22:29, 36F
→
11/10 22:29, , 37F
11/10 22:29, 37F
推
11/10 22:38, , 38F
11/10 22:38, 38F
→
11/10 22:38, , 39F
11/10 22:38, 39F
推
11/10 22:42, , 40F
11/10 22:42, 40F
推
11/10 22:44, , 41F
11/10 22:44, 41F
推
11/10 22:47, , 42F
11/10 22:47, 42F
推
11/10 22:48, , 43F
11/10 22:48, 43F
→
11/10 22:52, , 44F
11/10 22:52, 44F
噓
11/10 22:58, , 45F
11/10 22:58, 45F
推
11/10 23:01, , 46F
11/10 23:01, 46F
推
11/10 23:02, , 47F
11/10 23:02, 47F
推
11/10 23:07, , 48F
11/10 23:07, 48F
推
11/10 23:35, , 49F
11/10 23:35, 49F
→
11/10 23:35, , 50F
11/10 23:35, 50F
噓
11/10 23:35, , 51F
11/10 23:35, 51F
推
11/10 23:39, , 52F
11/10 23:39, 52F
推
11/10 23:42, , 53F
11/10 23:42, 53F
推
11/11 00:00, , 54F
11/11 00:00, 54F
→
11/11 00:00, , 55F
11/11 00:00, 55F
推
11/11 00:24, , 56F
11/11 00:24, 56F
→
11/11 00:27, , 57F
11/11 00:27, 57F
推
11/11 00:52, , 58F
11/11 00:52, 58F
→
11/11 00:52, , 59F
11/11 00:52, 59F
→
11/11 01:19, , 60F
11/11 01:19, 60F
推
11/11 01:19, , 61F
11/11 01:19, 61F
推
11/11 01:27, , 62F
11/11 01:27, 62F
推
11/11 01:37, , 63F
11/11 01:37, 63F
噓
11/11 07:12, , 64F
11/11 07:12, 64F
→
11/11 07:48, , 65F
11/11 07:48, 65F
推
11/11 08:08, , 66F
11/11 08:08, 66F
推
11/11 08:35, , 67F
11/11 08:35, 67F
噓
11/11 10:23, , 68F
11/11 10:23, 68F
→
11/11 10:23, , 69F
11/11 10:23, 69F
推
11/11 10:50, , 70F
11/11 10:50, 70F
推
11/11 11:04, , 71F
11/11 11:04, 71F
→
11/11 11:04, , 72F
11/11 11:04, 72F
噓
11/11 22:59, , 73F
11/11 22:59, 73F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 7 篇):