[新聞] 花媽快把舉債用完? 高市府批:柯文哲引用錯誤數據消失
用面積來算,讚~~
花媽快把舉債用完? 高市府批:柯文哲引用錯誤數據
繼悠遊卡嗶不進高雄輕軌後,台北市柯文哲諷刺高雄市長陳菊舉債,兩人再度掀起北高戰
火。針對柯文哲表示,高雄市2600億元的舉債額度,市長陳菊任內就用了2400億元。高市
府鄭重澄清,柯文哲所說的每一個數據都不是事實,請柯文哲勿再以錯誤數字評論高雄。
高市財政局說明,高雄市目前舉債剩餘空間仍有540億元,陳菊11年任內舉債約1千億元,
而統計至107年總預算案,陳菊任內償還勞健保欠費等等總計還款1208億,且高市府的舉
借金額已經連續七年下降。因此,柯文哲所說的每一個數據都不是事實,卻引用錯誤的數
據,傳播偏頗的評論。
財政局指出,台北市人口268.2萬,高雄市人口277.6萬,高雄市人口比台北市多9.4萬;
高雄市面積2951平方公里是六都最廣大,亦是台北市面積271平方公里的11倍,城鄉綜合
治理的任務相較台北市更複雜許多,常理而論,要照顧的人口及面積大,不是應該獲配較
多資源?
「但事實是,單單今年台北市的統籌分配稅款就比高雄市多了120億」,財政局說明,就
算比較過去幾年,每年台北市也比高雄多拿了超過100億以上,這是長久以來統籌分配稅
款分配公式的不公。而過去建設資源也獨厚台北,軌道總建設經費高達1兆元,14條捷運
路線加5條興建中。這些都墊高首都先天的優勢,但這樣的優勢主要是國家資源傾斜所致
,並非單一市長所努力獲致,坐擁這樣的資源更不應該打擊其他的縣市。
ETTODAY https://www.ettoday.net/news/20171104/1045339.htm
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 101.15.113.110
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1509772959.A.B0F.html
→
11/04 13:23, , 1F
11/04 13:23, 1F
推
11/04 13:23, , 2F
11/04 13:23, 2F
→
11/04 13:23, , 3F
11/04 13:23, 3F
推
11/04 13:23, , 4F
11/04 13:23, 4F
推
11/04 13:23, , 5F
11/04 13:23, 5F
→
11/04 13:24, , 6F
11/04 13:24, 6F
→
11/04 13:24, , 7F
11/04 13:24, 7F
→
11/04 13:24, , 8F
11/04 13:24, 8F
推
11/04 13:24, , 9F
11/04 13:24, 9F
推
11/04 13:24, , 10F
11/04 13:24, 10F
※ 編輯: pchunters123 (101.15.113.110), 11/04/2017 13:25:58
→
11/04 13:25, , 11F
11/04 13:25, 11F
推
11/04 13:25, , 12F
11/04 13:25, 12F
→
11/04 13:25, , 13F
11/04 13:25, 13F
推
11/04 13:25, , 14F
11/04 13:25, 14F
推
11/04 13:25, , 15F
11/04 13:25, 15F
推
11/04 13:25, , 16F
11/04 13:25, 16F
→
11/04 13:25, , 17F
11/04 13:25, 17F
→
11/04 13:25, , 18F
11/04 13:25, 18F
推
11/04 13:25, , 19F
11/04 13:25, 19F
噓
11/04 13:25, , 20F
11/04 13:25, 20F
→
11/04 13:25, , 21F
11/04 13:25, 21F
→
11/04 13:26, , 22F
11/04 13:26, 22F
→
11/04 13:26, , 23F
11/04 13:26, 23F
→
11/04 13:26, , 24F
11/04 13:26, 24F
推
11/04 13:26, , 25F
11/04 13:26, 25F
→
11/04 13:26, , 26F
11/04 13:26, 26F
→
11/04 13:26, , 27F
11/04 13:26, 27F
→
11/04 13:26, , 28F
11/04 13:26, 28F
→
11/04 13:26, , 29F
11/04 13:26, 29F
→
11/04 13:26, , 30F
11/04 13:26, 30F
→
11/04 13:26, , 31F
11/04 13:26, 31F
噓
11/04 13:26, , 32F
11/04 13:26, 32F
推
11/04 13:26, , 33F
11/04 13:26, 33F
→
11/04 13:26, , 34F
11/04 13:26, 34F
噓
11/04 13:26, , 35F
11/04 13:26, 35F
→
11/04 13:26, , 36F
11/04 13:26, 36F
推
11/04 13:27, , 37F
11/04 13:27, 37F
→
11/04 13:27, , 38F
11/04 13:27, 38F
還有 84 則推文
噓
11/04 14:26, , 123F
11/04 14:26, 123F
推
11/04 14:32, , 124F
11/04 14:32, 124F
→
11/04 14:32, , 125F
11/04 14:32, 125F
推
11/04 14:37, , 126F
11/04 14:37, 126F
噓
11/04 14:47, , 127F
11/04 14:47, 127F
噓
11/04 14:48, , 128F
11/04 14:48, 128F
→
11/04 14:49, , 129F
11/04 14:49, 129F
→
11/04 14:50, , 130F
11/04 14:50, 130F
→
11/04 14:53, , 131F
11/04 14:53, 131F
推
11/04 15:01, , 132F
11/04 15:01, 132F
推
11/04 15:13, , 133F
11/04 15:13, 133F
推
11/04 15:16, , 134F
11/04 15:16, 134F
噓
11/04 15:17, , 135F
11/04 15:17, 135F
推
11/04 15:18, , 136F
11/04 15:18, 136F
推
11/04 15:19, , 137F
11/04 15:19, 137F
推
11/04 15:23, , 138F
11/04 15:23, 138F
推
11/04 15:24, , 139F
11/04 15:24, 139F
→
11/04 15:24, , 140F
11/04 15:24, 140F
→
11/04 15:24, , 141F
11/04 15:24, 141F
推
11/04 15:26, , 142F
11/04 15:26, 142F
推
11/04 15:26, , 143F
11/04 15:26, 143F
→
11/04 15:29, , 144F
11/04 15:29, 144F
推
11/04 15:44, , 145F
11/04 15:44, 145F
噓
11/04 15:47, , 146F
11/04 15:47, 146F
推
11/04 16:04, , 147F
11/04 16:04, 147F
噓
11/04 16:21, , 148F
11/04 16:21, 148F
推
11/04 16:59, , 149F
11/04 16:59, 149F
→
11/04 17:08, , 150F
11/04 17:08, 150F
→
11/04 17:25, , 151F
11/04 17:25, 151F
→
11/04 17:30, , 152F
11/04 17:30, 152F
推
11/04 17:52, , 153F
11/04 17:52, 153F
推
11/04 17:54, , 154F
11/04 17:54, 154F
→
11/04 17:54, , 155F
11/04 17:54, 155F
推
11/04 18:33, , 156F
11/04 18:33, 156F
推
11/04 19:03, , 157F
11/04 19:03, 157F
噓
11/04 22:01, , 158F
11/04 22:01, 158F
推
11/05 00:28, , 159F
11/05 00:28, 159F
噓
11/05 06:46, , 160F
11/05 06:46, 160F
推
11/05 21:16, , 161F
11/05 21:16, 161F
噓
11/05 21:18, , 162F
11/05 21:18, 162F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 23 篇):