[問卦] 有人真的以為台獨不用流血@@?消失
翻開歷史 古今中外的獨立國家
沒有一個是不流血的
可是怎麼還有一群弱智以為大陸不敢打?
A.因為打了,中國內部先暴動
其實中國要打,早就先搞定內部
當中共白痴?維穩做幾年了
B.打了對中國沒有利益,他國伺機而動
其實要打,就共產國家VS民主國
中國一定會拉鄰國下水 怎麼允許他們壁上觀?用經濟實力就能威脅日美俄了
C.台灣是第一島鍊,扮演美國監視中國的重要角色,也扮演緩衝海上紛爭的角色
這又是笑話,現在大陸跟台灣(ROC)就是內戰時期,爭一個中國
自己家處理家務事 關他國屁事?
有沒有吱吱都很樂觀以為台獨不流血?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.251.35.14
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1506254016.A.63F.html
噓
09/24 19:54, , 1F
09/24 19:54, 1F
→
09/24 19:54, , 2F
09/24 19:54, 2F
推
09/24 19:54, , 3F
09/24 19:54, 3F
噓
09/24 19:54, , 4F
09/24 19:54, 4F
噓
09/24 19:54, , 5F
09/24 19:54, 5F
噓
09/24 19:54, , 6F
09/24 19:54, 6F
→
09/24 19:54, , 7F
09/24 19:54, 7F
推
09/24 19:54, , 8F
09/24 19:54, 8F
※ 編輯: j4y4wu3 (111.251.35.14), 09/24/2017 19:55:02
推
09/24 19:55, , 9F
09/24 19:55, 9F
→
09/24 19:55, , 10F
09/24 19:55, 10F
噓
09/24 19:55, , 11F
09/24 19:55, 11F
→
09/24 19:55, , 12F
09/24 19:55, 12F
噓
09/24 19:55, , 13F
09/24 19:55, 13F
→
09/24 19:55, , 14F
09/24 19:55, 14F
推
09/24 19:56, , 15F
09/24 19:56, 15F
推
09/24 19:56, , 16F
09/24 19:56, 16F
噓
09/24 19:56, , 17F
09/24 19:56, 17F
→
09/24 19:56, , 18F
09/24 19:56, 18F
→
09/24 19:57, , 19F
09/24 19:57, 19F
噓
09/24 19:57, , 20F
09/24 19:57, 20F
推
09/24 19:57, , 21F
09/24 19:57, 21F
→
09/24 19:57, , 22F
09/24 19:57, 22F
推
09/24 19:57, , 23F
09/24 19:57, 23F
噓
09/24 19:57, , 24F
09/24 19:57, 24F
→
09/24 19:58, , 25F
09/24 19:58, 25F
噓
09/24 19:58, , 26F
09/24 19:58, 26F
推
09/24 19:58, , 27F
09/24 19:58, 27F
噓
09/24 20:00, , 28F
09/24 20:00, 28F
→
09/24 20:00, , 29F
09/24 20:00, 29F
推
09/24 20:00, , 30F
09/24 20:00, 30F
噓
09/24 20:00, , 31F
09/24 20:00, 31F
推
09/24 20:00, , 32F
09/24 20:00, 32F
→
09/24 20:01, , 33F
09/24 20:01, 33F
噓
09/24 20:01, , 34F
09/24 20:01, 34F
噓
09/24 20:03, , 35F
09/24 20:03, 35F
→
09/24 20:04, , 36F
09/24 20:04, 36F
→
09/24 20:04, , 37F
09/24 20:04, 37F
噓
09/24 20:05, , 38F
09/24 20:05, 38F
噓
09/24 20:06, , 39F
09/24 20:06, 39F
噓
09/24 20:07, , 40F
09/24 20:07, 40F
→
09/24 20:09, , 41F
09/24 20:09, 41F
噓
09/24 20:09, , 42F
09/24 20:09, 42F
→
09/24 20:10, , 43F
09/24 20:10, 43F
噓
09/24 20:12, , 44F
09/24 20:12, 44F
推
09/24 20:12, , 45F
09/24 20:12, 45F
噓
09/24 20:13, , 46F
09/24 20:13, 46F
推
09/24 20:15, , 47F
09/24 20:15, 47F
噓
09/24 20:18, , 48F
09/24 20:18, 48F
→
09/24 20:23, , 49F
09/24 20:23, 49F
噓
09/24 20:41, , 50F
09/24 20:41, 50F
噓
09/24 21:00, , 51F
09/24 21:00, 51F
推
09/24 21:30, , 52F
09/24 21:30, 52F
推
09/24 21:59, , 53F
09/24 21:59, 53F
→
09/24 22:01, , 54F
09/24 22:01, 54F
→
09/24 22:01, , 55F
09/24 22:01, 55F
噓
09/25 00:28, , 56F
09/25 00:28, 56F
→
09/25 00:29, , 57F
09/25 00:29, 57F
噓
09/25 00:32, , 58F
09/25 00:32, 58F
→
09/25 00:32, , 59F
09/25 00:32, 59F
→
09/25 00:32, , 60F
09/25 00:32, 60F
推
09/25 00:33, , 61F
09/25 00:33, 61F
推
09/25 01:01, , 62F
09/25 01:01, 62F
噓
09/25 01:01, , 63F
09/25 01:01, 63F
推
09/25 01:04, , 64F
09/25 01:04, 64F
噓
09/25 01:05, , 65F
09/25 01:05, 65F
噓
09/25 01:16, , 66F
09/25 01:16, 66F
推
09/25 01:46, , 67F
09/25 01:46, 67F
→
09/25 01:46, , 68F
09/25 01:46, 68F
噓
09/25 01:53, , 69F
09/25 01:53, 69F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 11 篇):