Re: [問卦] 改叫「台灣」跟「中華民國」有什麼差別消失

看板Gossiping作者speedup時間8年前 (2017/05/14 21:16)推噓1(2推 1噓 9→)

留言12則, 5人參與討論串35/39 (看更多)

UN你英文看不懂中文拜托看一下好嗎都說是一人片面決定而且不符合規則 BBC的報導根本是錯了台灣從來不屬於中國哪來的split 歷史要重修的妓者寫的話也可以讓你高潮真是不簡單 ※ 引述《A6 (短ID真好)》之銘言： : ※ 引述《Vett (Vett)》之銘言： : 結果有人先補了UN的 : 你很愛用BBC的你要不要案看BBC英文怎麼寫的 : http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7003811.stm : UN rejects membership for Taiwan : The United Nations has once again blocked Taiwan's quest for membership of : the world body, despite a huge high-profile campaign by the island. : A key UN committee has rejected a proposal from Taiwan's allies to put its : bid on the agenda of the general assembly, meeting now in New York. : China, which claims Taiwan as a province, is adamantly opposed to UN : membership for the island. : Taiwan and mainland China split in 1949 amid civil war. : 台灣和中國大陸自1949年內戰後分開 : 拜託用吱吱的角度 BBC根本是藍媒好嗎 : : 會看BBC 不會看UN嗎? : : http://repository.un.org/bitstream/handle/11176/265928/A_62_193-EN.pdf : : ... : : However, the Secretary-General returned Taiwan’s application on 20 July 2007 : : without immediately placing the application before the representatives on the : : Security Council, as required by rule 59 of the provisional rules of procedure : : of the Security Council. : : We respectfully stress that the Secretary-General’s response goes beyond his : : prerogatives according to the sections of the Charter of the United Nations : : and the rules aforementioned. : : The Secretary-Generals unilateral determination that the United Nations : : considers “Taiwan for all intents and purposes to be an integral part : : of the People’s Republic of China” was a usurpation of the exclusive right : : and obligation of the Security Council to make such determination pursuant : : to rule 60 of the provisional rules of procedure of the Security Council, : : which states: “The Security Council shall decide whether in its judgment the : : applicant is a peace-loving State ...” : : 英文不行有簡體版可以看 : : http://repository.un.org/bitstream/handle/11176/265928/A_62_193-ZH.pdf : : 但是，秘书长于2007年7月20日退回了台湾的申请，而未按照安全理事会 : : 暂行议事规则第59条的规定，立即将该申请提交安全理事会的代表。 : : 恕我们直言，根据上述《联合国宪章》和规则的有关内容，秘书长的反应 : : 超出了他的特权范围。秘书长单方面决定，联合国认为“就一切意图和目 : : 的而言，台湾均是中华人民共和国不可分割的一部分”。这是在篡夺安全 : : 理事会依据安全理事会暂行议事规则第60条作出此类决定的专有权利和义 : : 务。 : : === : : 覺醒腦不願意面對的事實是下一關就是安理會的"一票否決" -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 164.107.146.20 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1494767782.A.1F7.html

推

Whitening

05/14 21:17, , 1^F

05/14 21:17, 1^F

→

05/14 21:21, , 2^F

05/14 21:21, 2^F

先把人貼標籤羞辱一頓被打臉後再說這是定義上的藍媒你這人還真矛盾

→

goenitzx

05/14 21:22, , 3^F

05/14 21:22, 3^F