[問卦] 補習班為什麼聽到實名制就嚇屎了???消失
支持補教業授課員工 1授課實名制 2須職登,上網公告 3去師職稱(授課員/工)
從眾多工讀生的反應看來,
授課員實名制好像著實踩到他們的痛處了啊!
痛!痛!
一堆補教業的既得利者好像都很急著出來轉移焦點.
WHY?
說什麼實名制無法防止性侵?這根本是假議題,
實名制本來就不是要防止性侵,不是要防止誘姦,強姦,通姦...
難道計乘車司機實名制也是為了防止性侵嗎?
不是,是為了防止那些戀童屁,誘姦屁,通姦屁躲在藝名之後.
出了誘姦事,假學歷,違法兼職,換個藝名又是一尾活龍啦!
說什麼,要實名制那PTT也要實名制,藝人也要實名制?
所以計乘車司機也要用藝名嗎?總統,立委也要用藝名嗎?
這樣來亂的言論,
簡單講,就是踩到痛處了啦!
如果,現在開始每天都讓那些補習業得利者一直看著實名制落實,
這些業者他們會
因為被誘姦而自殺嗎?
還是會開始嬌喘微微?
--
支持補教業授課員工 1授課實名制 2須職登,上網公告 3去師職稱(授課員/工)
如果補教業實名制不能落實,是時候該在選舉時,讓他們的教育部謙卑了.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.252.120.171
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1493907260.A.171.html
→
05/04 22:14, , 1F
05/04 22:14, 1F
噓
05/04 22:15, , 2F
05/04 22:15, 2F
→
05/04 22:15, , 3F
05/04 22:15, 3F
推
05/04 22:15, , 4F
05/04 22:15, 4F
推
05/04 22:15, , 5F
05/04 22:15, 5F
推
05/04 22:15, , 6F
05/04 22:15, 6F
→
05/04 22:15, , 7F
05/04 22:15, 7F
推
05/04 22:15, , 8F
05/04 22:15, 8F
→
05/04 22:15, , 9F
05/04 22:15, 9F
※ 編輯: jetbike (111.252.120.171), 05/04/2017 22:17:42
推
05/04 22:16, , 10F
05/04 22:16, 10F
推
05/04 22:16, , 11F
05/04 22:16, 11F
→
05/04 22:17, , 12F
05/04 22:17, 12F
推
05/04 22:17, , 13F
05/04 22:17, 13F
推
05/04 22:17, , 14F
05/04 22:17, 14F
推
05/04 22:17, , 15F
05/04 22:17, 15F
→
05/04 22:17, , 16F
05/04 22:17, 16F
→
05/04 22:18, , 17F
05/04 22:18, 17F
→
05/04 22:19, , 18F
05/04 22:19, 18F
推
05/04 22:19, , 19F
05/04 22:19, 19F
推
05/04 22:19, , 20F
05/04 22:19, 20F
→
05/04 22:19, , 21F
05/04 22:19, 21F
→
05/04 22:19, , 22F
05/04 22:19, 22F
推
05/04 22:19, , 23F
05/04 22:19, 23F
推
05/04 22:20, , 24F
05/04 22:20, 24F
推
05/04 22:20, , 25F
05/04 22:20, 25F
推
05/04 22:21, , 26F
05/04 22:21, 26F
→
05/04 22:21, , 27F
05/04 22:21, 27F
推
05/04 22:22, , 28F
05/04 22:22, 28F
推
05/04 22:23, , 29F
05/04 22:23, 29F
→
05/04 22:23, , 30F
05/04 22:23, 30F
推
05/04 22:24, , 31F
05/04 22:24, 31F
→
05/04 22:24, , 32F
05/04 22:24, 32F
推
05/04 22:25, , 33F
05/04 22:25, 33F
推
05/04 22:25, , 34F
05/04 22:25, 34F
→
05/04 22:25, , 35F
05/04 22:25, 35F
推
05/04 22:26, , 36F
05/04 22:26, 36F
→
05/04 22:26, , 37F
05/04 22:26, 37F
推
05/04 22:27, , 38F
05/04 22:27, 38F
→
05/04 22:30, , 39F
05/04 22:30, 39F
推
05/04 22:34, , 40F
05/04 22:34, 40F
推
05/04 22:36, , 41F
05/04 22:36, 41F
推
05/04 22:43, , 42F
05/04 22:43, 42F
推
05/04 22:44, , 43F
05/04 22:44, 43F
推
05/04 22:46, , 44F
05/04 22:46, 44F
推
05/04 22:46, , 45F
05/04 22:46, 45F
推
05/04 22:46, , 46F
05/04 22:46, 46F
推
05/04 22:46, , 47F
05/04 22:46, 47F
→
05/04 22:47, , 48F
05/04 22:47, 48F
推
05/04 22:47, , 49F
05/04 22:47, 49F
→
05/04 22:52, , 50F
05/04 22:52, 50F
推
05/04 22:53, , 51F
05/04 22:53, 51F
推
05/04 22:54, , 52F
05/04 22:54, 52F
→
05/04 22:55, , 53F
05/04 22:55, 53F
→
05/04 22:57, , 54F
05/04 22:57, 54F
推
05/04 22:58, , 55F
05/04 22:58, 55F
推
05/04 22:59, , 56F
05/04 22:59, 56F
→
05/04 22:59, , 57F
05/04 22:59, 57F
→
05/04 22:59, , 58F
05/04 22:59, 58F
→
05/04 23:00, , 59F
05/04 23:00, 59F
推
05/04 23:06, , 60F
05/04 23:06, 60F
推
05/04 23:07, , 61F
05/04 23:07, 61F
推
05/04 23:08, , 62F
05/04 23:08, 62F
→
05/04 23:11, , 63F
05/04 23:11, 63F
推
05/04 23:11, , 64F
05/04 23:11, 64F
推
05/04 23:11, , 65F
05/04 23:11, 65F
推
05/04 23:28, , 66F
05/04 23:28, 66F
推
05/04 23:28, , 67F
05/04 23:28, 67F
推
05/04 23:43, , 68F
05/04 23:43, 68F
推
05/04 23:45, , 69F
05/04 23:45, 69F
→
05/04 23:51, , 70F
05/04 23:51, 70F
推
05/04 23:59, , 71F
05/04 23:59, 71F
推
05/05 00:07, , 72F
05/05 00:07, 72F
推
05/05 00:07, , 73F
05/05 00:07, 73F
推
05/05 00:10, , 74F
05/05 00:10, 74F
推
05/05 00:48, , 75F
05/05 00:48, 75F
推
05/05 01:16, , 76F
05/05 01:16, 76F
推
05/05 01:23, , 77F
05/05 01:23, 77F
推
05/05 01:27, , 78F
05/05 01:27, 78F
推
05/05 01:50, , 79F
05/05 01:50, 79F
推
05/05 06:58, , 80F
05/05 06:58, 80F
推
05/05 08:00, , 81F
05/05 08:00, 81F
推
05/05 19:05, , 82F
05/05 19:05, 82F
推
05/05 19:05, , 83F
05/05 19:05, 83F
推
05/05 19:06, , 84F
05/05 19:06, 84F
推
05/05 19:07, , 85F
05/05 19:07, 85F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):