[問卦] 所以林奕含到底有沒有補過陳興國文?消失
一大堆人一直捕風捉影
說那個老師就是陳興 但卻一點證據都沒有
好啊
本魯判斷事情真假很簡單啦
就是看巧合夠不夠多
事不過三
巧合點1
林奕含跟陳興都是台南人
更正 出生澎湖的台南名師
巧合點2
有多位鄉民說書中很多故事跟陳興說過的話一樣
有人補充
陳興團隊三個主要老師
—李奐
陳國興(陳興)
潘華
這點有人可以幫證明只有這三位嗎?
還是說其實有一大堆主要老師
因為拼起來是
—李奐
陳國興(陳興)
潘華
但巧合點3一直沒有啊!!
所以林奕含到底有沒有補過陳興???
當年同屆現在26歲的台南女中ptt用戶
或是當年同屆有補陳興的人應該很多吧??
怎麼都沒有人出來說話呢??
更新-下面的文已經有榜單說有補過了
如果她真的上過你的課
可以出來說說話吧 避免被誤會啊
高中老師都能出來說很難過了
教過這樣的才女 出來惋惜一下不過分吧
只要一個人出來爆卦林奕含的確補過陳興
那那篇文絕對炎上吧!!
以下開放把這篇文推爆換高調釣當年同屆學生
滿足三個巧合的話真的要好好調查
沒有的話還這個人一個公道吧
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 49.215.65.137
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1493433520.A.38E.html
→
04/29 10:38, , 1F
04/29 10:38, 1F
→
04/29 10:39, , 2F
04/29 10:39, 2F
推
04/29 10:39, , 3F
04/29 10:39, 3F
推
04/29 10:39, , 4F
04/29 10:39, 4F
→
04/29 10:39, , 5F
04/29 10:39, 5F
推
04/29 10:39, , 6F
04/29 10:39, 6F
→
04/29 10:39, , 7F
04/29 10:39, 7F
噓
04/29 10:40, , 8F
04/29 10:40, 8F
→
04/29 10:40, , 9F
04/29 10:40, 9F
推
04/29 10:40, , 10F
04/29 10:40, 10F
推
04/29 10:40, , 11F
04/29 10:40, 11F
→
04/29 10:40, , 12F
04/29 10:40, 12F
噓
04/29 10:40, , 13F
04/29 10:40, 13F
推
04/29 10:41, , 14F
04/29 10:41, 14F
推
04/29 10:41, , 15F
04/29 10:41, 15F
推
04/29 10:41, , 16F
04/29 10:41, 16F
推
04/29 10:42, , 17F
04/29 10:42, 17F
→
04/29 10:42, , 18F
04/29 10:42, 18F
推
04/29 10:42, , 19F
04/29 10:42, 19F
→
04/29 10:42, , 20F
04/29 10:42, 20F
推
04/29 10:42, , 21F
04/29 10:42, 21F
→
04/29 10:42, , 22F
04/29 10:42, 22F
→
04/29 10:42, , 23F
04/29 10:42, 23F
推
04/29 10:42, , 24F
04/29 10:42, 24F
推
04/29 10:43, , 25F
04/29 10:43, 25F
推
04/29 10:43, , 26F
04/29 10:43, 26F
推
04/29 10:43, , 27F
04/29 10:43, 27F
→
04/29 10:43, , 28F
04/29 10:43, 28F
→
04/29 10:43, , 29F
04/29 10:43, 29F
推
04/29 10:44, , 30F
04/29 10:44, 30F
→
04/29 10:44, , 31F
04/29 10:44, 31F
→
04/29 10:44, , 32F
04/29 10:44, 32F
→
04/29 10:44, , 33F
04/29 10:44, 33F
推
04/29 10:44, , 34F
04/29 10:44, 34F
推
04/29 10:44, , 35F
04/29 10:44, 35F
→
04/29 10:44, , 36F
04/29 10:44, 36F
→
04/29 10:45, , 37F
04/29 10:45, 37F
→
04/29 10:45, , 38F
04/29 10:45, 38F
推
04/29 10:45, , 39F
04/29 10:45, 39F
還有 57 則推文
還有 3 段內文
→
04/29 11:07, , 97F
04/29 11:07, 97F
噓
04/29 11:11, , 98F
04/29 11:11, 98F
推
04/29 11:15, , 99F
04/29 11:15, 99F
→
04/29 11:18, , 100F
04/29 11:18, 100F
噓
04/29 11:20, , 101F
04/29 11:20, 101F
推
04/29 11:27, , 102F
04/29 11:27, 102F
噓
04/29 11:29, , 103F
04/29 11:29, 103F
噓
04/29 11:29, , 104F
04/29 11:29, 104F
推
04/29 11:32, , 105F
04/29 11:32, 105F
→
04/29 11:33, , 106F
04/29 11:33, 106F
噓
04/29 11:35, , 107F
04/29 11:35, 107F
推
04/29 11:37, , 108F
04/29 11:37, 108F
推
04/29 12:09, , 109F
04/29 12:09, 109F
推
04/29 12:09, , 110F
04/29 12:09, 110F
推
04/29 12:17, , 111F
04/29 12:17, 111F
推
04/29 12:29, , 112F
04/29 12:29, 112F
推
04/29 12:35, , 113F
04/29 12:35, 113F
推
04/29 12:36, , 114F
04/29 12:36, 114F
推
04/29 12:53, , 115F
04/29 12:53, 115F
推
04/29 12:58, , 116F
04/29 12:58, 116F
推
04/29 13:06, , 117F
04/29 13:06, 117F
→
04/29 13:06, , 118F
04/29 13:06, 118F
推
04/29 13:09, , 119F
04/29 13:09, 119F
推
04/29 13:27, , 120F
04/29 13:27, 120F
推
04/29 13:37, , 121F
04/29 13:37, 121F
推
04/29 13:52, , 122F
04/29 13:52, 122F
推
04/29 13:54, , 123F
04/29 13:54, 123F
推
04/29 13:56, , 124F
04/29 13:56, 124F
推
04/29 14:52, , 125F
04/29 14:52, 125F
推
04/29 15:02, , 126F
04/29 15:02, 126F
噓
04/29 15:03, , 127F
04/29 15:03, 127F
噓
04/29 15:07, , 128F
04/29 15:07, 128F
→
04/29 15:23, , 129F
04/29 15:23, 129F
推
04/29 15:29, , 130F
04/29 15:29, 130F
噓
04/29 17:58, , 131F
04/29 17:58, 131F
噓
04/29 18:33, , 132F
04/29 18:33, 132F
噓
04/29 21:18, , 133F
04/29 21:18, 133F
推
04/29 23:07, , 134F
04/29 23:07, 134F
→
04/30 21:16, , 135F
04/30 21:16, 135F
推
04/30 23:33, , 136F
04/30 23:33, 136F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 16 篇):