[新聞] 時力主張公教離婚配偶可分1/2年金 蔣萬安:那勞工呢?消失
1.媒體來源:
聯合報
2.完整新聞標題:
時力主張公教離婚配偶可分1/2年金 蔣萬安:那勞工呢?
3.完整新聞內文:
時代力量黨團版的年金改革法案,賦予離婚配偶年金分配請求權,公教人員配偶離婚最高
可分配公務人員的年金1/2。國民黨立委蔣萬安認為,該法立意不錯,但還須審酌,像勞
工平均退休金僅1萬6000元,可能自己都不夠用,在分配上恐有困難。
時代力量黨團立法理由解釋,該法條增訂依據民法親屬篇剩餘財產分配請求權之特別分配
方式,為公平評價配偶雙方在婚姻中的貢獻,並保障配偶老年經濟安全,離婚配偶依本條
請求時應依「民事程序」為之。意思就是說,離婚配偶可領到多少年金,必須依法院依個
案來判斷。
蔣萬安表示,如果要肯認家務有給,現行剩餘財產分配請求權已可以處理,是否要擴及年
金部分,可以再討論審酌。同樣,要肯定家務有給,不是只有公教人員配偶,軍、勞皆有
同樣問題。
蔣萬安表示,基層勞工的年金僅1萬6000元到1萬7000元,再分給離婚配偶的話,恐怕難以
維持生活。如果這部分要改革,必須要先拉近勞跟公教軍之間的年金差距,才符合公平原
則。
4.完整新聞連結 (或短網址):
https://udn.com/news/story/6656/2420337
5.備註:
屎帶力量
你們愧對勞工!
覺青
你們愧對公教軍!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 49.228.228.242
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1492925199.A.EE5.html
→
04/23 13:27, , 1F
04/23 13:27, 1F
推
04/23 13:27, , 2F
04/23 13:27, 2F
噓
04/23 13:27, , 3F
04/23 13:27, 3F
推
04/23 13:27, , 4F
04/23 13:27, 4F
→
04/23 13:27, , 5F
04/23 13:27, 5F
→
04/23 13:27, , 6F
04/23 13:27, 6F
→
04/23 13:27, , 7F
04/23 13:27, 7F
推
04/23 13:28, , 8F
04/23 13:28, 8F
→
04/23 13:28, , 9F
04/23 13:28, 9F
推
04/23 13:28, , 10F
04/23 13:28, 10F
噓
04/23 13:28, , 11F
04/23 13:28, 11F
推
04/23 13:28, , 12F
04/23 13:28, 12F
推
04/23 13:28, , 13F
04/23 13:28, 13F
推
04/23 13:29, , 14F
04/23 13:29, 14F
→
04/23 13:29, , 15F
04/23 13:29, 15F
噓
04/23 13:29, , 16F
04/23 13:29, 16F
噓
04/23 13:29, , 17F
04/23 13:29, 17F
→
04/23 13:30, , 18F
04/23 13:30, 18F
→
04/23 13:30, , 19F
04/23 13:30, 19F
推
04/23 13:31, , 20F
04/23 13:31, 20F
→
04/23 13:33, , 21F
04/23 13:33, 21F
→
04/23 13:33, , 22F
04/23 13:33, 22F
→
04/23 13:33, , 23F
04/23 13:33, 23F
→
04/23 13:33, , 24F
04/23 13:33, 24F
→
04/23 13:33, , 25F
04/23 13:33, 25F
→
04/23 13:33, , 26F
04/23 13:33, 26F
推
04/23 13:33, , 27F
04/23 13:33, 27F
→
04/23 13:33, , 28F
04/23 13:33, 28F
→
04/23 13:33, , 29F
04/23 13:33, 29F
→
04/23 13:33, , 30F
04/23 13:33, 30F
→
04/23 13:33, , 31F
04/23 13:33, 31F
噓
04/23 13:33, , 32F
04/23 13:33, 32F
推
04/23 13:35, , 33F
04/23 13:35, 33F
推
04/23 13:35, , 34F
04/23 13:35, 34F
噓
04/23 13:35, , 35F
04/23 13:35, 35F
噓
04/23 13:36, , 36F
04/23 13:36, 36F
→
04/23 13:36, , 37F
04/23 13:36, 37F
推
04/23 13:36, , 38F
04/23 13:36, 38F
噓
04/23 13:36, , 39F
04/23 13:36, 39F
還有 56 則推文
→
04/23 15:10, , 96F
04/23 15:10, 96F
推
04/23 15:29, , 97F
04/23 15:29, 97F
推
04/23 15:29, , 98F
04/23 15:29, 98F
噓
04/23 15:30, , 99F
04/23 15:30, 99F
推
04/23 15:32, , 100F
04/23 15:32, 100F
推
04/23 15:32, , 101F
04/23 15:32, 101F
推
04/23 15:33, , 102F
04/23 15:33, 102F
噓
04/23 15:34, , 103F
04/23 15:34, 103F
噓
04/23 15:36, , 104F
04/23 15:36, 104F
推
04/23 15:38, , 105F
04/23 15:38, 105F
噓
04/23 15:39, , 106F
04/23 15:39, 106F
噓
04/23 15:39, , 107F
04/23 15:39, 107F
噓
04/23 15:41, , 108F
04/23 15:41, 108F
噓
04/23 15:41, , 109F
04/23 15:41, 109F
噓
04/23 15:41, , 110F
04/23 15:41, 110F
推
04/23 15:51, , 111F
04/23 15:51, 111F
噓
04/23 15:52, , 112F
04/23 15:52, 112F
噓
04/23 15:54, , 113F
04/23 15:54, 113F
噓
04/23 15:58, , 114F
04/23 15:58, 114F
→
04/23 15:59, , 115F
04/23 15:59, 115F
推
04/23 15:59, , 116F
04/23 15:59, 116F
→
04/23 16:04, , 117F
04/23 16:04, 117F
噓
04/23 16:05, , 118F
04/23 16:05, 118F
→
04/23 16:18, , 119F
04/23 16:18, 119F
→
04/23 17:11, , 120F
04/23 17:11, 120F
推
04/23 17:14, , 121F
04/23 17:14, 121F
→
04/23 18:06, , 122F
04/23 18:06, 122F
推
04/23 18:12, , 123F
04/23 18:12, 123F
推
04/23 19:14, , 124F
04/23 19:14, 124F
噓
04/23 20:48, , 125F
04/23 20:48, 125F
→
04/23 22:25, , 126F
04/23 22:25, 126F
推
04/23 22:26, , 127F
04/23 22:26, 127F
推
04/23 22:27, , 128F
04/23 22:27, 128F
→
04/23 22:29, , 129F
04/23 22:29, 129F
→
04/23 22:31, , 130F
04/23 22:31, 130F
→
04/23 22:32, , 131F
04/23 22:32, 131F
推
04/23 23:39, , 132F
04/23 23:39, 132F
推
04/23 23:40, , 133F
04/23 23:40, 133F
推
04/23 23:40, , 134F
04/23 23:40, 134F
→
06/13 21:53, , 135F
06/13 21:53, 135F

討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 10 篇):