Re: [新聞] 蔡英文:氫能是非核家園戰略選項之一消失

看板Gossiping作者時間8年前 (2016/03/06 10:39), 8年前編輯推噓6(10426)
留言40則, 22人參與, 最新討論串11/21 (看更多)
氫能到底好不好,來聽聽鋼鐵人馬斯克怎麼說啦 https://youtu.be/YNV8qi_rJBg
結論:很笨 extremely silly It's just very difficult to make hydrogen, store it and use it on a car. Hydrogen is an energy storage mechanism. It's not a source of energy. So, you have to get the hydrogen from somewhere. 實在很難做出氫,儲存它,再用在車上. 氫是個儲存 能源的方式,不是一種能源. 所以你必須從其他地方 取得氫. If you get the hydrogen from water, so you're splitting H20. The electrolysis is extremely inefficient as an energy process. If you took a solar panel and use the energy from the solar panel to just charge a battery pack directly, compared to trying to split water, take the hydrogen, dump the oxygen, compress the hydrogen to an extremely high pressure or liquify it, and then put it in a car and run the fuel cell, it is about half the efficiency. It's terrible. What would you do that? It makes no sense. 如果你把水拿來分解H20. 電解水是效率非常低的過程. 如果你把太陽能板給充電池拿來比, 跟把水分解,拿氫, 丟掉氧,要極高壓壓縮氫或是讓它液態化,再把它放到車 上跑. 這效率差了一半. 太慘了. 為什麼要那樣做? 完全不合理. And then hydrogen has very low density. It's a pernicious molecule that likes to get all over the place. You get metal and .... from hydrogen. If you get hydrogen leak, it's an invisible gas. You can't even tell that it's leaking. And it's extremely flammable. When it does, it has an invisible flame. 而且氫的密度很低. 是很危險的分子會到處竄....如果 氫漏出來,是隱形的,你也看不出來在漏. 又易燃,燃燒 的火也是隱形的. If you're gonna pick an energy storage mechanism. Hydrogen is an incredibly dumb one to pick. You should just pick methane. That's much much easier. Or propane. 如果你要選儲存能量的方法,氫是非常愚蠢的選擇.不如選 甲烷,簡單多了. 或是丙烷. The best case hydrogen fuel cell doesn't win against the current case of batteries, so then obviously it doesn't make sense. That will become apparent in the next few years. There is no reason for us to have this debate. I've said my piece on this. It will be super obvious as time goes by. I don't know what more to say. 最理想的氫能燃料電池贏不過現有的電池,所以這很明顯不 合理. 再過幾年會更明白, 我們不需要在這裡辯論. 我要 說的就是這樣. 過些時間事情會變得清楚. 我不曉得還有 什麼能說的了. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 24.87.138.133 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1457231996.A.3FA.html

03/06 10:41, , 1F
你先把控制碼學好再來吧
03/06 10:41, 1F

03/06 10:41, , 2F
你一直32m是怎樣 幹
03/06 10:41, 2F
陰錯陽差 請到obov大了 久仰了 不好意思 我新手

03/06 10:41, , 3F
你32m?!
03/06 10:41, 3F

03/06 10:42, , 4F
32m
03/06 10:42, 4F
※ 編輯: iebpk (24.87.138.133), 03/06/2016 10:44:42

03/06 10:42, , 5F
顏色不對,你會被噓
03/06 10:42, 5F

03/06 10:42, , 6F
控制碼不會用就不要用
03/06 10:42, 6F

03/06 10:43, , 7F
現在不行不代表未來也是 科技進步後電解水的成本一定會降
03/06 10:43, 7F

03/06 10:43, , 8F
obov耶
03/06 10:43, 8F

03/06 10:44, , 9F
32m是啥小啦
03/06 10:44, 9F

03/06 10:45, , 10F
會不會上色?
03/06 10:45, 10F

03/06 10:45, , 11F
你不懂蔡英文跟台灣人的智商就別多說
03/06 10:45, 11F

03/06 10:45, , 12F
...就是不切實際 那個發電效率大概跟叫監獄囚犯人力
03/06 10:45, 12F

03/06 10:45, , 13F
發電一樣。
03/06 10:45, 13F

03/06 10:46, , 14F
小英說可以就可以
03/06 10:46, 14F

03/06 10:46, , 15F
有人會問你用太陽能分解氫能有沒有搞頭
03/06 10:46, 15F

03/06 10:46, , 16F
小英說可以就可以
03/06 10:46, 16F

03/06 10:46, , 17F
現在不行不代表未來也是 但是現在就是沒辦法拿來用
03/06 10:46, 17F

03/06 10:47, , 18F
政府也一直有在給經費做相關研究 國內從民國87-88年開始
03/06 10:47, 18F

03/06 10:48, , 19F
不過我對蔡英文的軍事內需很有興趣
03/06 10:48, 19F

03/06 10:48, , 20F
氫氣本來就不是很好的儲能工具 還有別的為啥非選它
03/06 10:48, 20F

03/06 10:48, , 21F
很多民眾就會問 為什麼政府不做事 為什麼不用什麼什麼技術
03/06 10:48, 21F

03/06 10:48, , 22F
如果能開放槍枝購買這個內需很龐大
03/06 10:48, 22F

03/06 10:48, , 23F
因為這個技術目前還在實驗室 沒辦法商用
03/06 10:48, 23F

03/06 10:48, , 24F
現在沒法用是因為擁核的一直在反 害研發一直做不下去
03/06 10:48, 24F

03/06 10:49, , 25F
那個五十年內都不可能實用的氫能蔡英文四年八年能幹
03/06 10:49, 25F

03/06 10:50, , 26F
689選她來礙台灣的
03/06 10:50, 26F

03/06 10:50, , 27F
三小朋友?腦袋正常都知道是唬爛
03/06 10:50, 27F

03/06 10:50, , 28F
蔡英文倒是可以開放槍枝,因為這是民主的象徵
03/06 10:50, 28F

03/06 10:51, , 29F
人民有槍才能推翻殘暴的政府
03/06 10:51, 29F

03/06 10:51, , 30F
福島核電廠 其實是因為產生了大量的氫氣 造成氫爆
03/06 10:51, 30F

03/06 10:52, , 31F
現在想要使用這技術的人 最好找個空曠點的地方
03/06 10:52, 31F

03/06 10:53, , 32F
現在連氫氣充氣球都禁止了,會爆啊大姐
03/06 10:53, 32F

03/06 10:59, , 33F
選票都騙到了要不然要怎麼樣
03/06 10:59, 33F

03/06 11:00, , 34F
那我也說技術突破後肥宅發電是選項之一 現階段就不可
03/06 11:00, 34F

03/06 11:01, , 35F
技術突破後一定是方舟反應爐發電,人人肛鐵人。@@
03/06 11:01, 35F
※ 編輯: iebpk (24.87.138.133), 03/06/2016 11:06:00

03/06 11:08, , 36F
英皇說要有氫就有氫,懂?
03/06 11:08, 36F

03/06 11:19, , 37F
台灣武則天
03/06 11:19, 37F

03/06 11:49, , 38F
氫氣吸太多逆
03/06 11:49, 38F

03/06 12:06, , 39F
甲烷也無色透明啊
03/06 12:06, 39F

03/06 14:22, , 40F
689恆等式:689=689 只要成為689智商就是那樣了
03/06 14:22, 40F
文章代碼(AID): #1MsvXyFw (Gossiping)
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 11 之 21 篇):
文章代碼(AID): #1MsvXyFw (Gossiping)