Re: [討論] 你們會不會覺得00 Gundam太強了?(小雷)
而且不知道大家有沒有發現
DOUBLE 0 RAISER也還不是最完全型,只有搭載殺慈‧CLOTHROAD的時候,
才會發揮出400%以上的實力
每當殺慈搭載在O RAISER上的那幾話,鋼彈的戰果都相當豐碩
所以說殺慈也許才是 DOUBLE 0 RAISER如此超乎常識的強大的關鍵
接著來看另外一個可能性
00兩季中最帶賽的角色殺慈,在第一季中他不僅剋死唯一的親人,還剋死了丈母娘一家
(還有女友的一隻手)
(剎那)
雖然他本人一直把責任推拖到鋼彈的身上,但我確信他的確有給周圍帶來霉運的可怕鬥氣
再加上00 RAISER TRANSAM後有擴張人類意識圈的特殊能力,透過這個機制,
00 RAISER把殺慈身上的霉運鬥氣散播到戰場的每個人身上,
修為較差的雜魚就被CB的其他鋼彈給撈走了,即使強者如路易斯的前隊長還是得領便當
看來只有革新者才能勉強頂得住......
說說罷了
是說我覺得00 RAISER強度表現還是差強人意,領先了世界400年的超科學
怎麼會只有這種程度?
我期待00爐加上TRANSAM還可以有更多令人意想不到的神奇力量
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 122.117.171.78
推
02/15 01:40, , 1F
02/15 01:40, 1F
噓
02/15 01:41, , 2F
02/15 01:41, 2F
推
02/15 01:43, , 3F
02/15 01:43, 3F
→
02/15 01:43, , 4F
02/15 01:43, 4F
→
02/15 01:44, , 5F
02/15 01:44, 5F
→
02/15 01:44, , 6F
02/15 01:44, 6F
噓
02/15 01:45, , 7F
02/15 01:45, 7F
→
02/15 01:46, , 8F
02/15 01:46, 8F
→
02/15 01:47, , 9F
02/15 01:47, 9F
→
02/15 01:47, , 10F
02/15 01:47, 10F
→
02/15 01:47, , 11F
02/15 01:47, 11F
推
02/15 01:48, , 12F
02/15 01:48, 12F
→
02/15 01:49, , 13F
02/15 01:49, 13F
→
02/15 01:49, , 14F
02/15 01:49, 14F
→
02/15 01:49, , 15F
02/15 01:49, 15F
推
02/15 01:50, , 16F
02/15 01:50, 16F
→
02/15 01:50, , 17F
02/15 01:50, 17F
→
02/15 01:50, , 18F
02/15 01:50, 18F
→
02/15 01:51, , 19F
02/15 01:51, 19F
→
02/15 01:51, , 20F
02/15 01:51, 20F
推
02/15 01:51, , 21F
02/15 01:51, 21F
→
02/15 01:52, , 22F
02/15 01:52, 22F
→
02/15 01:52, , 23F
02/15 01:52, 23F
推
02/15 01:53, , 24F
02/15 01:53, 24F
推
02/15 01:53, , 25F
02/15 01:53, 25F
→
02/15 01:53, , 26F
02/15 01:53, 26F
→
02/15 01:53, , 27F
02/15 01:53, 27F
→
02/15 01:53, , 28F
02/15 01:53, 28F
→
02/15 01:54, , 29F
02/15 01:54, 29F
→
02/15 01:54, , 30F
02/15 01:54, 30F
→
02/15 01:54, , 31F
02/15 01:54, 31F
→
02/15 01:55, , 32F
02/15 01:55, 32F
推
02/15 01:55, , 33F
02/15 01:55, 33F
推
02/15 01:57, , 34F
02/15 01:57, 34F
→
02/15 01:58, , 35F
02/15 01:58, 35F
推
02/15 01:58, , 36F
02/15 01:58, 36F
推
02/15 02:00, , 37F
02/15 02:00, 37F
→
02/15 02:01, , 38F
02/15 02:01, 38F
推
02/15 02:02, , 39F
02/15 02:02, 39F
→
02/15 02:03, , 40F
02/15 02:03, 40F
→
02/15 02:03, , 41F
02/15 02:03, 41F
→
02/15 02:04, , 42F
02/15 02:04, 42F
→
02/15 02:04, , 43F
02/15 02:04, 43F
→
02/15 02:04, , 44F
02/15 02:04, 44F
→
02/15 02:05, , 45F
02/15 02:05, 45F
→
02/15 02:05, , 46F
02/15 02:05, 46F
→
02/15 02:08, , 47F
02/15 02:08, 47F
推
02/15 02:09, , 48F
02/15 02:09, 48F
→
02/15 02:18, , 49F
02/15 02:18, 49F
→
02/15 02:21, , 50F
02/15 02:21, 50F
推
02/15 02:23, , 51F
02/15 02:23, 51F
→
02/15 02:23, , 52F
02/15 02:23, 52F
→
02/15 02:25, , 53F
02/15 02:25, 53F
→
02/15 02:27, , 54F
02/15 02:27, 54F
→
02/15 02:27, , 55F
02/15 02:27, 55F
推
02/15 02:30, , 56F
02/15 02:30, 56F
→
02/15 04:37, , 57F
02/15 04:37, 57F
推
02/15 10:33, , 58F
02/15 10:33, 58F
推
02/15 14:25, , 59F
02/15 14:25, 59F
→
03/18 15:52, , 60F
03/18 15:52, 60F
→
05/28 17:50, , 61F
05/28 17:50, 61F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 17 之 36 篇):