Re: [爆料] 打帶跑癱瘓戰術利弊與目前輿論風向
看板FuMouDiscuss作者BioMachine (Blueberry Night)時間10年前 (2014/04/29 22:41)推噓0(2推 2噓 64→)留言68則, 10人參與討論串8/11 (看更多)
我支持318,323,411等行動
我也認為打帶跑戰術是很有效的一種抗爭方式
不過在核四這場戰役上有討論空間
多年來, 核四抗爭的基調就是比較平和的
比方說核四公投促進會多年來所堅持的那樣
除此之外, 核四抗爭的訴求方式也應該是比較溫情取向的
比方說訴求母親要保護下一代生存空間的願望等等
城市游擊阻街抗爭的優點在於讓警方疲於奔命
因為來不及驅離, 也會影響我方人員的耗損
不過在核四這場抗爭裡面
和林義雄靜默的抗爭基調似乎有些不同
建議往後這類的游擊式抗爭應該針對總統或行政院長等個人進行
長久來看, 這些少數個人會發現台灣到處都不歡迎他
因為這些個人到哪裡都會有一堆管制維安和抗爭, 很不方便
※ 引述《larmefromsky ()》之銘言:
: 今天晚上的快閃癱瘓活動
: 目前的政論節目:
: TVBS少康戰情室--- 4位來賓連同主持人全部一致 狂罵反核人士
: 壹電視--- 民進黨 梁文傑 也罵這次行動
: 戰神姚立民 說不了解這次行動 也保持中立狀態
: 年代新聞面對面---- 因為是比較早的錄影,所以沒什麼談
: 三立 新台灣加油---- 只有徐永明比較挺這次行動
: 各台整點新聞強力放送郝龍斌記者會上的強硬態度
: 極力想要把快閃活動與暴亂劃上等號
: 這就代表這個行動如果持續下去
: 一定會帶給郝龍斌很大的壓力
: 因為目前看不出他們要怎麼應付這種快閃癱瘓的抗議
: 很明顯他們害怕了! 所以才會裝得很強硬!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.233.77.78
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/FuMouDiscuss/M.1398782494.A.68E.html
→
04/29 22:43, , 1F
04/29 22:43, 1F
→
04/29 22:43, , 2F
04/29 22:43, 2F
噓
04/29 22:48, , 3F
04/29 22:48, 3F
→
04/29 22:49, , 4F
04/29 22:49, 4F
→
04/29 22:52, , 5F
04/29 22:52, 5F
→
04/29 23:02, , 6F
04/29 23:02, 6F
→
04/29 23:02, , 7F
04/29 23:02, 7F
→
04/29 23:03, , 8F
04/29 23:03, 8F
→
04/29 23:04, , 9F
04/29 23:04, 9F
噓
04/29 23:05, , 10F
04/29 23:05, 10F
→
04/29 23:05, , 11F
04/29 23:05, 11F
→
04/29 23:05, , 12F
04/29 23:05, 12F
→
04/29 23:06, , 13F
04/29 23:06, 13F
→
04/29 23:06, , 14F
04/29 23:06, 14F
→
04/29 23:06, , 15F
04/29 23:06, 15F
→
04/29 23:07, , 16F
04/29 23:07, 16F
→
04/29 23:07, , 17F
04/29 23:07, 17F
→
04/29 23:07, , 18F
04/29 23:07, 18F
→
04/29 23:07, , 19F
04/29 23:07, 19F
→
04/29 23:08, , 20F
04/29 23:08, 20F
→
04/29 23:08, , 21F
04/29 23:08, 21F
→
04/29 23:08, , 22F
04/29 23:08, 22F
→
04/29 23:08, , 23F
04/29 23:08, 23F
→
04/29 23:09, , 24F
04/29 23:09, 24F
→
04/29 23:09, , 25F
04/29 23:09, 25F
→
04/29 23:09, , 26F
04/29 23:09, 26F
→
04/29 23:09, , 27F
04/29 23:09, 27F
→
04/29 23:10, , 28F
04/29 23:10, 28F
→
04/29 23:10, , 29F
04/29 23:10, 29F
→
04/29 23:12, , 30F
04/29 23:12, 30F
→
04/29 23:12, , 31F
04/29 23:12, 31F
→
04/29 23:12, , 32F
04/29 23:12, 32F
→
04/29 23:12, , 33F
04/29 23:12, 33F
→
04/29 23:13, , 34F
04/29 23:13, 34F
→
04/29 23:15, , 35F
04/29 23:15, 35F
→
04/29 23:15, , 36F
04/29 23:15, 36F
→
04/29 23:15, , 37F
04/29 23:15, 37F
→
04/29 23:15, , 38F
04/29 23:15, 38F
→
04/29 23:16, , 39F
04/29 23:16, 39F
→
04/29 23:16, , 40F
04/29 23:16, 40F
→
04/29 23:17, , 41F
04/29 23:17, 41F
→
04/29 23:17, , 42F
04/29 23:17, 42F
→
04/29 23:17, , 43F
04/29 23:17, 43F
→
04/29 23:17, , 44F
04/29 23:17, 44F
→
04/29 23:17, , 45F
04/29 23:17, 45F
→
04/29 23:18, , 46F
04/29 23:18, 46F
→
04/29 23:18, , 47F
04/29 23:18, 47F
→
04/29 23:19, , 48F
04/29 23:19, 48F
→
04/29 23:19, , 49F
04/29 23:19, 49F
→
04/29 23:20, , 50F
04/29 23:20, 50F
→
04/29 23:21, , 51F
04/29 23:21, 51F
→
04/29 23:22, , 52F
04/29 23:22, 52F
推
04/29 23:23, , 53F
04/29 23:23, 53F
→
04/29 23:23, , 54F
04/29 23:23, 54F
→
04/29 23:23, , 55F
04/29 23:23, 55F
→
04/29 23:24, , 56F
04/29 23:24, 56F
→
04/29 23:24, , 57F
04/29 23:24, 57F
→
04/29 23:25, , 58F
04/29 23:25, 58F
→
04/29 23:25, , 59F
04/29 23:25, 59F
→
04/29 23:26, , 60F
04/29 23:26, 60F
→
04/29 23:27, , 61F
04/29 23:27, 61F
→
04/29 23:27, , 62F
04/29 23:27, 62F
→
04/29 23:28, , 63F
04/29 23:28, 63F
→
04/29 23:28, , 64F
04/29 23:28, 64F
→
04/29 23:28, , 65F
04/29 23:28, 65F
→
04/29 23:29, , 66F
04/29 23:29, 66F
推
04/29 23:33, , 67F
04/29 23:33, 67F
→
04/29 23:37, , 68F
04/29 23:37, 68F
討論串 (同標題文章)