Re: [文法] 與事實相反

看板Eng-Class作者tijj (my two cents)時間13年前 (2013/01/08 14:51)推噓3(3推 0噓 16→)

留言19則, 7人參與討論串3/8 (看更多)

※ 引述《hopeliu (阿翔)》之銘言： : 與事實相反(counterfactual)文法問題 : If he ___________ that, he ________________ a thief. : (a)does will been : (b)were to steal would are : (c)were to steal will be : (d)were to steal would be : 答案給的是d， : c選項不對的理由是？ : 我在想到底是句子正確但不是與事實相反？還是句子本身錯誤？ : 謝各位大大。推 campfire:這是與未來事實相反的假設所以C的will要改成would 01/06 16:58 → campfire:If + S + were to + V , S + should/could/would/might 01/06 16:59 → campfire: + V 01/06 17:00 推 tijj:d之外,c可以是正確選項. 01/08 11:10 推 l10nel:未來可能性小（但非完全不可能），c) were to + would 正常 01/08 13:48 → l10nel: ^^d) would 正常 01/08 13:48 → l10nel:c) will 是極少見的邊緣用法,的確出現在某些書中,雜誌文章, 01/08 13:49 → l10nel:小說,粗略估計will/would比率大概1:30吧,不建議用will。 01/08 13:50 → l10nel:這were是past subjunctive,很自然搭配will的過去式would。 01/08 13:53 補充一下,如果出題老師說c錯,就給他/她看麻省理工所出版的語文邏輯學系列教科書: Conditionals by Nicholas Rescher Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 2007, pp 23 http://ppt.cc/USfK Counterfactual If he were to do that, he would be a fool. If he were to do that, he will be a fool. If he had done that, he would have been a fool. ※ 編輯: tijj 來自: 210.69.13.1 (01/08 15:18)

推

hopeliu

01/08 16:07, , 1^F

01/08 16:07, 1^F

→

hopeliu

01/08 16:08, , 2^F

01/08 16:08, 2^F

→

hopeliu

01/08 16:08, , 3^F

01/08 16:08, 3^F