[問題] 假如軸心國勝利會怎麼包裝政治正確?
總覺得同盟國勝利後的政治正確真的是無懈可擊,
反種族清洗、反法西斯、反獨裁、反侵略,
主張民主自由,像中國抗戰結束那個鳥樣也是號稱民主自由。
假如軸心國勝利,那種族優越會變成政治正確嗎?
還是因為我們這幾代人已經被教育成天生排斥種族優越主張?
(或者當時德日的種族優越說真的是主流輿論嗎?)
開明高壓專制這倒是很多國家實施中,
而且人民有錢賺就願意幫忙洗地護航,
所以獨裁這概念應該包裝成政治正確並不難。
侵略的定義也很容易閃避,
像現今大國軍事干設加個魁儡政權就能打著維和名號了,
更何況中國的軍隊名稱還叫做"人民解放軍"呢。
不得讓我很好奇,假如美英中當初真的戰敗,
德日的教育會怎麼樣包裝對立方的戰爭罪行呢?
--
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zgqu1jb2HY
推
,
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.233.232.86
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/DummyHistory/M.1502552324.A.547.html
→
08/13 00:12, , 1F
08/13 00:12, 1F
推
08/13 01:00, , 2F
08/13 01:00, 2F
推
08/13 02:51, , 3F
08/13 02:51, 3F
推
08/13 02:59, , 4F
08/13 02:59, 4F
推
08/13 03:27, , 5F
08/13 03:27, 5F
推
08/13 09:20, , 6F
08/13 09:20, 6F
→
08/13 09:20, , 7F
08/13 09:20, 7F
→
08/13 09:21, , 8F
08/13 09:21, 8F
→
08/13 09:21, , 9F
08/13 09:21, 9F
→
08/13 09:21, , 10F
08/13 09:21, 10F
→
08/13 09:24, , 11F
08/13 09:24, 11F
→
08/13 09:24, , 12F
08/13 09:24, 12F
→
08/13 09:24, , 13F
08/13 09:24, 13F
→
08/13 09:24, , 14F
08/13 09:24, 14F
→
08/13 10:18, , 15F
08/13 10:18, 15F
推
08/13 10:27, , 16F
08/13 10:27, 16F
推
08/13 10:30, , 17F
08/13 10:30, 17F
→
08/13 10:32, , 18F
08/13 10:32, 18F
→
08/13 10:34, , 19F
08/13 10:34, 19F
推
08/13 10:53, , 20F
08/13 10:53, 20F
→
08/13 10:54, , 21F
08/13 10:54, 21F
→
08/13 10:54, , 22F
08/13 10:54, 22F
→
08/13 10:54, , 23F
08/13 10:54, 23F
推
08/13 12:00, , 24F
08/13 12:00, 24F
→
08/13 12:02, , 25F
08/13 12:02, 25F
→
08/13 12:02, , 26F
08/13 12:02, 26F
→
08/13 14:04, , 27F
08/13 14:04, 27F
→
08/13 14:04, , 28F
08/13 14:04, 28F
推
08/13 14:06, , 29F
08/13 14:06, 29F
→
08/13 14:07, , 30F
08/13 14:07, 30F
推
08/15 00:05, , 31F
08/15 00:05, 31F
推
08/19 18:33, , 32F
08/19 18:33, 32F
→
08/19 18:33, , 33F
08/19 18:33, 33F
→
08/20 14:20, , 34F
08/20 14:20, 34F
→
08/20 14:20, , 35F
08/20 14:20, 35F
→
08/20 14:21, , 36F
08/20 14:21, 36F
→
08/20 14:22, , 37F
08/20 14:22, 37F
→
08/20 14:24, , 38F
08/20 14:24, 38F
→
08/20 14:29, , 39F
08/20 14:29, 39F
→
08/20 14:29, , 40F
08/20 14:29, 40F
→
08/20 14:29, , 41F
08/20 14:29, 41F
→
08/20 14:30, , 42F
08/20 14:30, 42F
→
08/20 14:32, , 43F
08/20 14:32, 43F
→
08/20 14:32, , 44F
08/20 14:32, 44F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 9 篇):