Re: [閒聊] "攝影"與"拍照"
攝影:photo-graphy,寫真
拍照:take a shot,say chees
如果還分不清楚,可以看看以下幾位藝術家的作品
1.Abelardo Morell
http://www.imgii.com/archives/49263
2.吳天章
http://www.maintrendgallery.com.tw/tw/exhibition_detial.php?exsn=60
3.王慶松
http://ppt.cc/BD6d
4.森村泰昌
http://ppt.cc/j0G0
5.Jeff Wall
http://0rz.tw/5358Z
6.Gregory Crewdson
http://0rz.tw/1f5e3
7.Loretta lux
http://0rz.tw/d95ax
8.Sandy Skoglund
http://0rz.tw/ae5e7
9.ERWIN OLAF
http://0rz.tw/025cp
10.Utsu Yumiko
http://image.fengniao.com/226/2262709.html
11.John Clang
http://ppt.cc/ulT4
※ 引述《ironmaiden (Iron Maiden)》之銘言:
: 小弟我有許多所謂玩攝影的朋友,我發現在這些攝影好友裡面,總有這一些人
: 常常會說攝影跟拍照是不一樣的,有時候資歷越深的人卻越愛講這句話,
: 但在小弟我眼裡"拍照就是在攝影",只是拍的有沒有想法有沒有另一層意義罷了
: 我覺得許多攝影人很喜歡去區分這一塊,把攝影拉進象牙塔裡,把攝影變的似乎是一件
: 很困難的事情,好讓自己的地位更加崇高。
: 就像畫畫一樣,大家都會,只是有人的畫可以放在羅浮宮,如此而已。
: 不知道板上大家對"攝影"還有"拍照",有無其他看法?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 123.194.237.111
※ 編輯: hifree 來自: 123.194.237.111 (06/19 22:58)
推
06/19 23:00, , 1F
06/19 23:00, 1F
推
06/20 00:26, , 2F
06/20 00:26, 2F
→
06/20 00:33, , 3F
06/20 00:33, 3F
→
06/20 01:04, , 4F
06/20 01:04, 4F
→
06/20 01:05, , 5F
06/20 01:05, 5F
這時候我就要推這篇文章了
http://wenku.baidu.com/view/b4ad96c48bd63186bcebbc6f.html
從來沒有人綁架攝影
只是在藝術的領域裡
攝影這一詞所代表的意義其實比拍照更廣泛
它意味著用光來做畫
甚至可以完全不使用相機
以上
→
06/20 01:23, , 6F
06/20 01:23, 6F
推
06/20 01:50, , 7F
06/20 01:50, 7F
→
06/20 01:51, , 8F
06/20 01:51, 8F
→
06/20 01:51, , 9F
06/20 01:51, 9F
→
06/20 01:52, , 10F
06/20 01:52, 10F
吳天章有解釋過喔
中文裡所謂照像就是為已經死的人留下影像
http://www.025jb.com/thread-10159-1-1.html
而拍照則是對於已經逝去的一切留下影像紀錄而已
相:ㄒ|ㄤ,(又音)ㄒ|ㄤˋ,它是一個名詞:有著外表及容貌的意思。例如:「面相」、「相貌」,例如:相貌意指經過時間變化後,產生的許多不同的外貌』。其實攝影早期傳入中國,曾經引起多方的誤解及傳說,吳天章提到:『阮義忠「中國攝影史」一書…
提起19世紀西方的旅行攝影家和貿易商人和傳教士將攝影器械帶進中國,清末中國人看到當時的「鎂」閃光燈乍閃,即能留下黑白靜態相片和會動的黑白影片,總錯以為會懾人魂魄,在攝影術未傳入中國前,人們為了保存容貌的形象,只有借助傳統畫師的手繪。畫活著的人叫“小照”,畫死者謂之“影像”;“照相”的前身--“照像”就是兩個名詞合起來的,「懾」‧「相」就是兩個名詞合起來的』,而這二個名詞,則一直感動著吳天章。
http://www.maintrendgallery.com.tw/tw/exhibition_detial.php?exsn=60
而羅蘭巴特《明室》亦持有相同的見解
他認為相片本身僅是在提醒我們一個已經逝去的過往
而拍照本身就是為物質留下死像而已
以證明它曾經存在於這個世界
※ 編輯: hifree 來自: 123.194.237.111 (06/20 02:06)
→
06/20 02:06, , 11F
06/20 02:06, 11F
→
06/20 02:06, , 12F
06/20 02:06, 12F
→
06/20 02:07, , 13F
06/20 02:07, 13F
→
06/20 02:09, , 14F
06/20 02:09, 14F
→
06/20 02:10, , 15F
06/20 02:10, 15F
→
06/20 02:11, , 16F
06/20 02:11, 16F
→
06/20 02:12, , 17F
06/20 02:12, 17F
→
06/20 03:28, , 18F
06/20 03:28, 18F
→
06/20 05:16, , 19F
06/20 05:16, 19F
→
06/20 05:25, , 20F
06/20 05:25, 20F
→
06/20 05:25, , 21F
06/20 05:25, 21F
→
06/20 05:32, , 22F
06/20 05:32, 22F
→
06/20 05:32, , 23F
06/20 05:32, 23F
以光作畫不須要拍照的行為也可以完成
只要有這個設備就可以了
http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%9A%97%E7%AE%B1
Abelardo Morell 的作品就是個明證
當他把整個房間設計成暗箱的時候
就已經是攝影了
又觀念攝影中允許創作者使用他人的相片進行再創作
而被包含在攝影的範疇中
這也是不需要拍照的行為
譬如說台灣的創作人梅丁衍,他平日喜歡到跳蚤市場收集舊的照片,收集回來
之後再重新構思,重新組合這些肖像照。他用他自己說故事的方式,將一些人
物還算清析的黑白人像照當素材,擷取裡面的人物影像再改頭換面的拼貼一番
,然後再用電腦繪圖軟體進行臉部表情的處理或做局部手工的上彩動作,企圖
賦予照片更多的歷史懷舊感,這也叫攝影
但卻沒有經過按下快門的動作
→
06/20 05:33, , 24F
06/20 05:33, 24F
→
06/20 05:54, , 25F
06/20 05:54, 25F
→
06/20 05:54, , 26F
06/20 05:54, 26F
※ 編輯: hifree 來自: 123.194.237.111 (06/20 08:09)
推
06/20 09:14, , 27F
06/20 09:14, 27F
推
06/20 11:20, , 28F
06/20 11:20, 28F
→
06/20 11:21, , 29F
06/20 11:21, 29F
→
06/20 12:54, , 30F
06/20 12:54, 30F
推
06/20 14:59, , 31F
06/20 14:59, 31F
推
06/20 17:09, , 32F
06/20 17:09, 32F
推
06/20 17:15, , 33F
06/20 17:15, 33F
why not?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine-art_photography
Fine art photography is photography created in accordance with the vision of the artist as photographer. Fine art photography stands in contrast to representational photography, such as photojournalism, which provides a documentary visual account of specific subjects and events, literally re-presenting objective reality rather than the subjective intent of the photographer; and commercial photography, the primary focus of which is to advertise products or services.
Among the definitions that can be found in reference books are:
"Art photography": "Photography that is done as a fine art -- that is, done to express the artist's perceptions and emotions and to share them with others".[1]
"Fine art photography": "A picture that is produced for sale or display rather than one that is produced in response to a commercial commission".[2]
"Fine art photography": "The production of images to fulfill the creative vision of a photographer. ... Synonymous with art photography".[3]
"Art photography": A definition "is elusive," but "when photographers refer to it, they have in mind the photographs seen in magazines such as American Photo, Popular Photography, and Print, and in salons and exhibitions. Art (or artful) photography is salable.".[4]
"Artistic photography": "A frequently used but somewhat vague term. The idea underlying it is that the producer of a given picture has aimed at something more than a merely realistic rendering of the subject, and has attempted to convey a personal impression".[5]
"Fine art photography": Also called "decor photography," "photo decor," or "wall decor," this "involves selling large photos... that can be used as wall art".[4]
※ 編輯: hifree 來自: 59.120.39.93 (06/20 17:39)
→
06/20 18:53, , 34F
06/20 18:53, 34F
→
06/20 18:54, , 35F
06/20 18:54, 35F
推
06/23 20:45, , 36F
06/23 20:45, 36F
→
06/23 20:45, , 37F
06/23 20:45, 37F
→
08/18 17:55, , 38F
08/18 17:55, 38F
→
10/06 03:01, , 39F
10/06 03:01, 39F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
閒聊
21
71
完整討論串 (本文為第 28 之 28 篇):
閒聊
21
71
閒聊
6
26
閒聊
8
25
閒聊
30
189
閒聊
10
12
閒聊
20
106