[閒聊] 無詠唱算超能力而不是魔法吧?已回收
如題
最近看的小說幾乎都把無詠唱當基本技能了...
雖然魔法跟超能力都是異能
但個人認為還是有所區別的
就像足球是用腳射門而曲棍球是用球桿射門般
儘管都是射門得點但內容卻大不相同
如果以我流分辨的話
超能力:可分先天後天,都是自然覺醒的想學也沒辦法學
最多練熟練度,單靠想像就能運用
魔法:得靠後天學習和訓練,使用時手段很繁複
但可以靠魔導具或法陣來快速啟動
所以心想事成的無詠唱個人會分類成超能力
不知道各位覺得如何呢?
感謝~
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 101.14.5.3
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1455501087.A.BDB.html
→
02/15 09:52, , 1F
02/15 09:52, 1F
推
02/15 09:53, , 2F
02/15 09:53, 2F
→
02/15 09:53, , 3F
02/15 09:53, 3F
→
02/15 09:55, , 4F
02/15 09:55, 4F
推
02/15 09:55, , 5F
02/15 09:55, 5F
→
02/15 09:55, , 6F
02/15 09:55, 6F
→
02/15 09:56, , 7F
02/15 09:56, 7F
推
02/15 09:57, , 8F
02/15 09:57, 8F
這倒是真的
推
02/15 09:57, , 9F
02/15 09:57, 9F
→
02/15 09:57, , 10F
02/15 09:57, 10F
→
02/15 09:57, , 11F
02/15 09:57, 11F
→
02/15 10:00, , 12F
02/15 10:00, 12F
※ 編輯: zaku2015 (1.174.117.53), 02/15/2016 10:04:00
推
02/15 10:03, , 13F
02/15 10:03, 13F
推
02/15 10:03, , 14F
02/15 10:03, 14F
→
02/15 10:03, , 15F
02/15 10:03, 15F
你可以使用法符或把法陣紋在身上啊~
推
02/15 10:05, , 16F
02/15 10:05, 16F
推
02/15 10:05, , 17F
02/15 10:05, 17F
※ 編輯: zaku2015 (1.174.117.53), 02/15/2016 10:08:06
推
02/15 10:07, , 18F
02/15 10:07, 18F
→
02/15 10:07, , 19F
02/15 10:07, 19F
→
02/15 10:07, , 20F
02/15 10:07, 20F
→
02/15 10:08, , 21F
02/15 10:08, 21F
→
02/15 10:09, , 22F
02/15 10:09, 22F
推
02/15 10:09, , 23F
02/15 10:09, 23F
→
02/15 10:10, , 24F
02/15 10:10, 24F
→
02/15 10:13, , 25F
02/15 10:13, 25F
→
02/15 10:13, , 26F
02/15 10:13, 26F
→
02/15 10:13, , 27F
02/15 10:13, 27F
推
02/15 10:14, , 28F
02/15 10:14, 28F
推
02/15 10:17, , 29F
02/15 10:17, 29F
推
02/15 10:19, , 30F
02/15 10:19, 30F
推
02/15 10:22, , 31F
02/15 10:22, 31F
推
02/15 10:22, , 32F
02/15 10:22, 32F
→
02/15 10:28, , 33F
02/15 10:28, 33F
推
02/15 10:29, , 34F
02/15 10:29, 34F
推
02/15 10:31, , 35F
02/15 10:31, 35F
→
02/15 10:31, , 36F
02/15 10:31, 36F
推
02/15 10:31, , 37F
02/15 10:31, 37F
→
02/15 10:33, , 38F
02/15 10:33, 38F
→
02/15 10:34, , 39F
02/15 10:34, 39F
推
02/15 10:34, , 40F
02/15 10:34, 40F
推
02/15 10:35, , 41F
02/15 10:35, 41F
→
02/15 10:36, , 42F
02/15 10:36, 42F
→
02/15 10:36, , 43F
02/15 10:36, 43F
→
02/15 10:37, , 44F
02/15 10:37, 44F
→
02/15 10:38, , 45F
02/15 10:38, 45F
推
02/15 10:49, , 46F
02/15 10:49, 46F
推
02/15 10:49, , 47F
02/15 10:49, 47F
→
02/15 10:49, , 48F
02/15 10:49, 48F
推
02/15 10:49, , 49F
02/15 10:49, 49F
→
02/15 10:52, , 50F
02/15 10:52, 50F
→
02/15 10:54, , 51F
02/15 10:54, 51F
→
02/15 10:55, , 52F
02/15 10:55, 52F
推
02/15 10:56, , 53F
02/15 10:56, 53F
→
02/15 10:57, , 54F
02/15 10:57, 54F
推
02/15 10:59, , 55F
02/15 10:59, 55F
推
02/15 11:01, , 56F
02/15 11:01, 56F
推
02/15 11:05, , 57F
02/15 11:05, 57F
推
02/15 11:14, , 58F
02/15 11:14, 58F
推
02/15 11:45, , 59F
02/15 11:45, 59F
→
02/15 11:54, , 60F
02/15 11:54, 60F
→
02/15 11:54, , 61F
02/15 11:54, 61F
推
02/15 12:06, , 62F
02/15 12:06, 62F
推
02/15 12:13, , 63F
02/15 12:13, 63F
→
02/15 12:13, , 64F
02/15 12:13, 64F
推
02/15 12:19, , 65F
02/15 12:19, 65F
推
02/15 12:25, , 66F
02/15 12:25, 66F
→
02/15 12:41, , 67F
02/15 12:41, 67F
推
02/15 15:08, , 68F
02/15 15:08, 68F
→
02/15 16:05, , 69F
02/15 16:05, 69F
推
02/15 16:22, , 70F
02/15 16:22, 70F
→
02/15 18:46, , 71F
02/15 18:46, 71F
推
02/15 18:57, , 72F
02/15 18:57, 72F
→
02/15 19:15, , 73F
02/15 19:15, 73F
→
02/15 19:17, , 74F
02/15 19:17, 74F
推
02/15 20:52, , 75F
02/15 20:52, 75F
推
02/16 03:35, , 76F
02/16 03:35, 76F
→
02/16 03:35, , 77F
02/16 03:35, 77F
推
02/16 21:06, , 78F
02/16 21:06, 78F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 10 篇):