[閒聊] 加入我方戰力沒有下降的反派?已回收
各位也知道不管是遊戲或動畫或漫畫
很多作品中原本敵方的角色被我方打敗後加入我方
平均戰力都會下降
雖然普遍原因很多是屬於加入主角方後洗心革面不想再像之前一樣才自我限縮
藏馬應該也算是這種...吧?
有沒有作品是敵方角色加入我方後戰力依然屌打敵人的
剛剛是有想到閃靈二人組的赤屍藏人
可是他本身就不屬於主角陣營的人 只是有時利害一致時才成為同伴
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 61.224.185.120
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1455012338.A.B9A.html
推
02/09 18:06, , 1F
02/09 18:06, 1F
上校超IMBA的 不過我還是覺得他當敵役時戰力比我們操縱的時候強
推
02/09 18:07, , 2F
02/09 18:07, 2F
推
02/09 18:07, , 3F
02/09 18:07, 3F
※ 編輯: a4567850 (61.224.185.120), 02/09/2016 18:08:03
推
02/09 18:07, , 4F
02/09 18:07, 4F
推
02/09 18:08, , 5F
02/09 18:08, 5F
推
02/09 18:08, , 6F
02/09 18:08, 6F
→
02/09 18:09, , 7F
02/09 18:09, 7F
推
02/09 18:09, , 8F
02/09 18:09, 8F
推
02/09 18:10, , 9F
02/09 18:10, 9F
推
02/09 18:13, , 10F
02/09 18:13, 10F
達爾有變強嗎(誤
推
02/09 18:14, , 11F
02/09 18:14, 11F
→
02/09 18:14, , 12F
02/09 18:14, 12F
阿濕男明明就下降 看看他開救世主時 比雜魚還不如
→
02/09 18:16, , 13F
02/09 18:16, 13F
推
02/09 18:18, , 14F
02/09 18:18, 14F
推
02/09 18:21, , 15F
02/09 18:21, 15F
推
02/09 18:21, , 16F
02/09 18:21, 16F
推
02/09 18:21, , 17F
02/09 18:21, 17F
※ 編輯: a4567850 (61.224.185.120), 02/09/2016 18:26:30
推
02/09 18:27, , 18F
02/09 18:27, 18F
推
02/09 18:27, , 19F
02/09 18:27, 19F
推
02/09 18:28, , 20F
02/09 18:28, 20F
推
02/09 18:30, , 21F
02/09 18:30, 21F
推
02/09 18:31, , 22F
02/09 18:31, 22F
推
02/09 18:31, , 23F
02/09 18:31, 23F
→
02/09 18:32, , 24F
02/09 18:32, 24F
推
02/09 18:32, , 25F
02/09 18:32, 25F
→
02/09 18:33, , 26F
02/09 18:33, 26F
→
02/09 18:34, , 27F
02/09 18:34, 27F
推
02/09 18:37, , 28F
02/09 18:37, 28F
推
02/09 18:41, , 29F
02/09 18:41, 29F
→
02/09 18:42, , 30F
02/09 18:42, 30F
→
02/09 18:43, , 31F
02/09 18:43, 31F
推
02/09 18:49, , 32F
02/09 18:49, 32F
推
02/09 18:50, , 33F
02/09 18:50, 33F
推
02/09 18:50, , 34F
02/09 18:50, 34F
→
02/09 18:52, , 35F
02/09 18:52, 35F
→
02/09 18:53, , 36F
02/09 18:53, 36F
→
02/09 18:54, , 37F
02/09 18:54, 37F
推
02/09 19:01, , 38F
02/09 19:01, 38F
→
02/09 19:03, , 39F
02/09 19:03, 39F
推
02/09 19:03, , 40F
02/09 19:03, 40F
→
02/09 19:03, , 41F
02/09 19:03, 41F
推
02/09 19:16, , 42F
02/09 19:16, 42F
推
02/09 19:17, , 43F
02/09 19:17, 43F
推
02/09 19:21, , 44F
02/09 19:21, 44F
→
02/09 19:29, , 45F
02/09 19:29, 45F
推
02/09 19:31, , 46F
02/09 19:31, 46F
→
02/09 19:52, , 47F
02/09 19:52, 47F
推
02/09 19:54, , 48F
02/09 19:54, 48F
推
02/09 19:56, , 49F
02/09 19:56, 49F
推
02/09 20:07, , 50F
02/09 20:07, 50F
推
02/09 20:15, , 51F
02/09 20:15, 51F
推
02/09 20:27, , 52F
02/09 20:27, 52F
推
02/09 20:34, , 53F
02/09 20:34, 53F
推
02/09 20:45, , 54F
02/09 20:45, 54F
推
02/09 21:04, , 55F
02/09 21:04, 55F
推
02/09 22:06, , 56F
02/09 22:06, 56F
推
02/09 22:22, , 57F
02/09 22:22, 57F
推
02/09 22:48, , 58F
02/09 22:48, 58F
推
02/09 22:58, , 59F
02/09 22:58, 59F
推
02/10 00:23, , 60F
02/10 00:23, 60F
推
02/10 00:24, , 61F
02/10 00:24, 61F
推
02/10 03:58, , 62F
02/10 03:58, 62F
推
02/10 04:16, , 63F
02/10 04:16, 63F
推
02/10 19:02, , 64F
02/10 19:02, 64F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 5 篇):