作者查詢 / yauhh
作者 yauhh 在 PTT [ Programming ] 看板的留言(推文), 共615則
限定看板:Programming
看板排序:
全部Soft_Job2172Master_D1344Tokusatsu1142JingXingBoys948C_and_CPP649Programming615logic386Lomo364Coffee298Visual_Basic231Cloud197PeopleSeries128Emergency124AndroidDev121Prob_Solve119Little-Games117photo102gallantry87CSSE78PLT78ComeHere77C_Sharp72book56CTV46Python44ShiauLiang42poem39Gossiping35L_TalkandCha35CodeJob28Ajax26L_LifeJob24magic_silver23Inference22Guolun20FJU-STAT95B19NCYU_BE_96b19NDHU-phy10119NIU-ECE94b19Isayama17LaTeX17soho15KingofPop12RealPlaying12TKU_EW94B12Linux10NTU-IPH9610NUK_AC9810share10Translate-CS10AfterPhD9NCKU-BEH959Christianity8FLAT_CLUB8NCCUflamenco8NCHU_CsHsnu8SYSOP8Viator98Bing8W-Philosophy8NUU-EE-97A7sky7SSSH-16th-Fk7GameDesign6JinYong6media-chaos6Ptt-Charity6TaiwanDrama6ai-photo5GossipPicket5HCHS933145KS93-3165XiangSheng5CYCU_Chem92b4CYCU_ICE90AB4Emulator4HSNU_11464Interdiscip4JP_Entertain4Militarylife4NCCU05_GIDS4NCCU_PFBASE4NCHU-Wind4NDHU-Ch994Notebook4NTPU-CSIE954NTUEE_Speech4NTUST-EE-B934PhD4PttLaw4Starbucks4Windows4Boy-Girl3Buddhism3FinalFantasy3Gamesale3Google3HarryPotter3Hate3HCSHch13_3113Keelung3KUAS_CSIE3NCCU3NCTU_CS_EDA3NDSH_6th3143NSwitch3NSYSU-Chem993OOAD3paranormal3PhotoCritic3Salary3Sijhih3SSSH-16th3093STREET_BALL3Tech_Job3TigerBlue3Violation3army_53-2T2B97A013XX2comm_and_RF2CS95WISDOM2Dragonica2Ecophilia2Education2EmailYang2FJU_JCS112Folklore2HHSH2HK-movie2java2Jeans2KOTDFansClub2KS98-3022MCU_Talk2Men5432MUSTMIS2NARUTO2NCHU-AGR052NCHU-MEgradu2NCHU-Mount2NCHU_MBA972NCNUEM2NDHU-phy1022NewAge2NKUTEE2NSYSU_EE95-12ntnuch95c2NTOU-EBFS932NTPU-CSIE982NTUEE_LAB2062NTUST-TX-B962Patent2Peter_EN2PHP2PttHistory2PublicServan2PushDoll2SayLove2SuperBike2Tainan2THU_BA20002transgender2Yup-mwgc2Yup03-042About_Life1AD_NCCU_VB1Ancient1Android1Anti-ramp1ASHS-93-li1AU_Talk1Aviation1B98A013XX1Badminton1Beauty1BigSanchung1bookhouse1Browsers1Bus1Butterfly1C_ChatBM1CareerLady1ChangHua1Cheer1Childhood1CHSH-96-3101Civil1ck46th3311ck47th3201ck55th3071ck55th3201ck57th3211ck58th3241cksh82nd3211clmusic1Comic1consumer1CPSHS10th3031Cross_Life1CrossGate1CSI1CSMU-D991customers1dance1DIABLO1digger1DJ_fightman1DummyHistory1Editor1Employee1EuropeTravel1Facebook1facelift1Fiction1FishShrimp1FJU-Family1Fooyin1GuildWars1GUNNM1HanDian1HRM1HSNU_10351HSNU_10651HSNU_10951HSNU_11421Hualien1ILSH-973091Instant_Mess1japanavgirls1jhs_30_51JOJO1joke1kawaii1KERORO1KingdomHuang1KNU1KS90-3111KS92-3161KS93-3171KS94-3121KS95-3211KS96-3151KS97-3101KS97-3131KS97-3181KS97-3201KS_PMAC1Lifeismoney1Lineage1LTK1M_Manson1marvel1meditation1MIT1Modchip1MRT1Nantou1NatureSeeker1Navy1NBAEasyChat1NCCU-YP1NCCU06_JAPAN1NCCU08_LawB1NCCU_PubLaw1NCCU_SEED1NCHU-FS981NCHU-MKT991NCKU_CSIE931NCKU_MEPhC1NCTU_HARCLUB1NCU97ME-B1NDHU1NDHU_ACC_5TH1NKNU_Phy0981NPUST1NSYSU_MSOE991NTHU_EDA2231NTHU_HIS971NTHU_IEEM-941NTHUTL981NTNU-HISBK1NTNUMasSport1NTPU-COECO951NTPU-CSIE961NTPU-STAT951NTU1NTUGIEE_RFIC1NTUMBA-981NTUphy971NTUST_Talk1NTUT_ME495A1NYUST00_FING1Old-Games1PCCU_Talk1peianyang1PingTung1Printer_scan1PttLifeLaw1RO1Rock_OE1RPGMaker1RumikoTWorld1SailorMoon1ScienceNote1SCU_Law101D1Seiya1ShowOff1SHU-JourM981Shu-Lin1ShuangHe1SongShan1SOS1Spain1SSSH-09th1141StoneAge1SuperHeroes1Supermission1Supernatural1SWORD1TA_AN1Taipei1tajen1TamShui1Taoism1TFSHS61st3211TFSHS67th3211TFSHS68th3211Tin-Ha1TNFSH98th1translator1TTU-AFL1TTU-talk1TY_Research1TypeMoon1Volleyball1WarHammer1Wego5-yi1WorkanTravel1WorkinChina1YUGIOH1YZU_EE96B1YZU_MLSB1YZUfinGrad961ZQ-Physics1<< 收起看板(343)
2F推:試試看用DoxBox執行它118.167.52.43 09/01 16:31
4F→:對!是DosBos (再誤)118.167.52.43 09/01 20:00
5F推:好明白118.167.54.220 08/11 21:12
3F→:當然可以118.167.54.220 08/11 20:36
3F推:"Subscript out of range"中文就是陣列超出36.226.96.9 07/19 21:46
4F→:索引範圍. 你可以用UBound,LBound函數來查36.226.96.9 07/19 21:46
5F→:陣列邊界.36.226.96.9 07/19 21:46
4F推:真是的,我只是唯一會來回答prolog問題的咖36.226.96.9 07/19 07:47
2F→:根本就不知道,難不成key key key value?61.231.70.138 06/17 19:46
4F→:你有沒有看懂我在表達什麼呀?並不是不懂而已61.231.70.138 06/17 19:56
4F推:很老式的C語法59.112.224.179 06/16 00:04
1F→:你刪了卻還要統計刪了哪些,然後再重新找答案61.231.64.224 06/12 19:27
2F→:在你解釋範圍中,演算法看起來越來越繁雜.61.231.64.224 06/12 19:28
6F→:還在撐啊,你這方法根本沒用,還一直補充?61.231.64.224 06/12 23:13
7F→:然後我並沒有很堅持說有所謂NP solution,61.231.64.224 06/12 23:14
8F→:你可以不必一直抬轎.61.231.64.224 06/12 23:14
12F推:請你搞清楚,你這個題目的算法並沒有回答正確59.112.231.99 07/01 19:55
13F→:但後來卻是你這個答錯的人不時在說"多看算法59.112.231.99 07/01 19:56
14F→:的書吧" 這一類的話. 自己答錯,卻好愛跑出來59.112.231.99 07/01 19:56
15F→:當人的老師,推文大亂鬥. 捫心自問,這樣是否59.112.231.99 07/01 19:57
16F→:為一位專業者可以表現出的資態?59.112.231.99 07/01 19:57
17F→:我是覺得,一個不知道或不承認自己錯誤的人,59.112.231.99 07/01 19:59
18F→:講那什麼道理是沒什麼說服力可言的.59.112.231.99 07/01 19:59
19F→:快點長大吧,小鬼.59.112.231.99 07/01 19:59
5F→:我求不錯的解的做法,在我前文中第二方法中.59.112.227.2 06/10 07:04
6F→:至於所謂後知後覺,其實是不知不覺,因為我根59.112.227.2 06/10 07:05
7F→:本沒想要破解你的方法,是從理解你的方法之後59.112.227.2 06/10 07:05
8F→:看出漏餡之處.59.112.227.2 06/10 07:05
11F→:那又怎麼樣?最起碼我發表了自己的破解解釋.59.112.227.2 06/10 07:07
14F→:我不需要證明方法是NP,因為並沒有討論這一點59.112.227.2 06/10 07:08
15F→:你說我說的是別人講過的事情,對,因為在本文59.112.227.2 06/10 07:15
16F→:張貼之前,我根本看不懂你的方法究竟怎麼做.59.112.227.2 06/10 07:15
17F→:你描述的時候前後說詞修來修去,黑手動作多,59.112.227.2 06/10 07:16
18F→:是到前一位bob板友質疑才看明白你所講的.59.112.227.2 06/10 07:17
20F→:可見你講了這個方法有多難懂.59.112.227.2 06/10 07:18
23F→:講方法講的別人不懂,這也是演算學者的大忌.59.112.227.2 06/10 07:18
25F→:少來一套,你也沒有解釋你的方法是不是NP.59.112.227.2 06/10 07:19
26F→:為什麼我突然要回答方法是不是NP?59.112.227.2 06/10 07:20
29F→:你是說你推文中說你方法是P那樣子嗎?但是,59.112.227.2 06/10 07:20
31F→:你的方法錯,所以P或NP,沒用,不是嗎?59.112.227.2 06/10 07:21
32F→:那你到底要不要承認你犯了錯?59.112.227.2 06/10 07:21
34F→:如果不要承認,那就不要囉唆囉,我還接到水球59.112.227.2 06/10 07:21
36F→:要我加油,我就不知道是要加什麼油59.112.227.2 06/10 07:22
41F→:你連推同一組推文二次,有什麼意義?59.112.227.2 06/10 07:24
42F→:我也不是演算學者啊59.112.227.2 06/10 07:24
44F→:他是問這問題是不是NP,而不是解法是不是NP.59.112.227.2 06/10 07:25
47F→:你第一篇回文只說像是P59.112.227.2 06/10 07:26
48F→:說錯了,你第一篇推文只說是P.59.112.227.2 06/10 07:26
49F→:所以你就是說,方法被抓到錯,不當一回事.59.112.227.2 06/10 07:27
51F→:第二篇推文,你沒有提到P or NP.59.112.227.2 06/10 07:27
52F→:第三篇推文是我和原po的對話.59.112.227.2 06/10 07:27
55F→:第五篇推文,你根本沒有提P or NP.59.112.227.2 06/10 07:28
57F→:第六篇bob板友提問,你用回文方式處理,但是,59.112.227.2 06/10 07:28
58F→:但是你那篇回文雖然回了,但是解答中看得出59.112.227.2 06/10 07:29
60F→:漏餡漏很多. 自刪了.59.112.227.2 06/10 07:29
62F→:至於現在你一直在說我不看人家的文,但是我59.112.227.2 06/10 07:30
64F→:核對發現我都有看啊. 你的確沒有討論P or NP59.112.227.2 06/10 07:30
65F→:那你說說這個問題是不是NP?59.112.227.2 06/10 07:31
66F→:咦,我都已經這樣很有誠意跟你核對文章內容..59.112.227.2 06/10 07:33
68F→:你到底在哪裏做了"是否為NP"的討論?59.112.227.2 06/10 07:33
70F→:我承認我並沒有討論NP. 那你說我該討論NP,59.112.227.2 06/10 07:34
71F→:為什麼你不討論呢?59.112.227.2 06/10 07:34
74F→:如果你不是心虛,不會這樣纏著我的推文不放.59.112.227.2 06/10 07:37
75F→:那我離開programming板囉,星期天要輕鬆,bye59.112.227.2 06/10 07:38
82F→:可是是你自己去強調是否NP的,這會兒突然變59.112.231.99 07/01 19:43
83F→:別人去理NP不NP. 至於原po既然問了NP不NP,59.112.231.99 07/01 19:44
84F→:你又要後來否定原po的問題,你很矛盾耶.59.112.231.99 07/01 19:44
3F→:增增刪刪就化簡成聯集差集,就簡單了.218.160.110.179 06/04 10:29
5F→:不是表達不表達,而是你這種算法黑手動作修來218.160.110.179 06/04 11:44
6F→:修去,不覺得很累嗎?其實就只是求差集而已.218.160.110.179 06/04 11:45
9F→:我認為是把不同層次的東西混在一起,才變黑手218.160.110.179 06/04 12:09
11F→:但沒有人都是用直接求的啦,做資料結構不難.218.160.110.179 06/04 12:10
15F推:樓上,我已經回文指出你的方法有錯.59.112.227.2 06/10 06:48
16F→:我覺得當你不確定你自己很對,不要太自信滿滿59.112.227.2 06/10 06:50
20F→:原po指明我回文中第一方法有錯,我已經承認.59.112.227.2 06/10 07:12
21F→:這樣說來,我是怎麼自信滿滿了?59.112.227.2 06/10 07:12
22F→:至於我文中第二方法,是老實將所有(N,M)組合59.112.227.2 06/10 07:13
23F→:拿出來找最少合併數,這是暴力法,當然有信心.59.112.227.2 06/10 07:14