作者查詢 / vampirex
作者 vampirex 在 PTT 全部看板的留言(推文), 共781則
限定看板:全部
看板排序:
全部LAW157Lawyer105CLHS-TALK49PttLifeLaw48LegalTheory33PublicServan26medache25StupidClown25Aviation17Blog16Wikipedia16EZsoft11Examination9Wallpaper9Flickr8JP_Custom8SCU_LAWS8Gossiping7image7m-flo7Master_D5Simcity5Broad_Band4Hong_Kong4MAC3movie3MRT3NCUFingrad033NTHU_LST_963NTHU_STAT943NTUmed913TA_AN3TW-history3Architecture2Barista2Beauty2Browsers2DSLR2Game-Talk2GIS2GTA2IA2InitialD2Instant_Mess2J-PopStation2Japandrama2joke2Magazine2Militarylife2NCCU_PubLaw2photo2Printer_scan2TheSims2TransLaw2YP94-3022B921010XX1B98303XXX1car1ChangHua1ck48th3061ck49th3101ck50th3231ck54th3311CMU_BST011consumer1creditcard1CSI1CSMU-D971CTSH913021Digital_Art1Digitalhome1DTJH_3221DYU1Economics1Education1FarRadio1FCU_EE97A1FJU-Family1FJU_AD-041FJU_GF1Geography1Gintama1Google1HSNU_10101HSNU_10981HSNU_11131HSNU_11701HSNU_9381HSNU_9901iPod1Japan_Travel1JapanMovie1KERORO1KS90-3091KS94-3091KS96-3051KS97-3031Lineage1Little-Games1LivingGoods1Lomo1MACAU1MingDao33H21NCCU02_Stat1NCCU03_ETHNO1NCCU03_PF1NCCU06_PA1NCCU08_Ethno1NCHU-AGR001NCHU-AGR041NCKU_ECO971NCKU_MEPhC1NDMC-M1031NDMC-M1081NDMC-N561NDMC-PH231NKUTEE1NSwitch1NSYSU-Chem991NTCU-SPE92A1NTPU-ECONM941NTPU-YP1NTU-IPH921NTUE-CS981NTUEE_LAB5261NTUST-DT92-11NYUST1Old_Egg1PttHistory1Railway1RSSH95_3021share1SHU_IPR1sky1SpaceArt1SSSH-16th-Fk1SSSH-16th3131STDM-94-3151Storage_Zone1SurvivalGame1SW_Job1SY_MusicSE1Tennis1TFG98Chung1TFSHS69th3231Theater1THUAS_911Trace1TTU-Transfer1TYSH49-3021Ur-hsing1USC1Wen-Shan1WuLing46-3171Yunlin1Zhongzheng1<< 收起看板(156)
8F推:6.台灣沒有類似的日本國民參審(裁判員)制度07/08 23:01
15F→:僱傭契約非要式07/08 21:28
5F→:唉....感謝樓上各位,看來得跑一趟光華了07/07 15:10
1F推:那間從萬芳醫院站過去較快06/23 21:36
1F→:書店裡不是有相關辭典嗎............06/20 11:42
2F→:民法也有官方英譯版本,可一併參照06/20 11:42
1F推:+1 ......06/15 13:38
20F推:可不買,只是你最好借到一件照相用,不然滿奇怪的06/16 10:44
22F推:第一梯滿多雙榜的同學還是有買啊,畢竟是個紀念06/17 11:20
27F推:fb社團、blog都是受訓中成立的06/19 00:07
1F推:1.原則上是,不過北院有案件管理流程,會先分審查庭作爭05/23 14:28
2F→:點整理,之後會再改分到民庭。2.這個5/9回答過了。05/23 14:29
12F→:要處罰一個行為必須要有正面的可罰性基礎,反面尋找「不05/23 00:05
13F→:可罰的理由」?你是推定人類所有行為都可罰然後再來反面05/23 00:06
14F→:排除嗎?05/23 00:06
15F→:另,「並非沒有可罰性」是因為「需要」?這是哪門子論證05/23 00:07
32F噓:反面推比較快?這說法不僅邏輯上有問題,在經驗上亦同;05/23 09:10
33F→:我只能說你如此粗糙的嚴謹度真的不適合討論法律。05/23 09:10
1F→:如果對方是故意讓其他人看到才有成立的可能性05/22 00:40