作者查詢 / defent
作者 defent 在 PTT [ DSLR ] 看板的留言(推文), 共28則
限定看板:DSLR
看板排序:
全部Lawyer593FuMouDiscuss388MenTalk190GetMarry105Tainan103Boy-Girl93Examination74creditcard63THU_Talk43Gossiping41PublicIssue41LAW38iOS32DSLR28Modchip27Law-Basket25Accounting24PttLifeLaw23Salary23Steam22ChungLi18Emulator18CMWang17DC17PushDoll16HCKuo13SMSlife12StupidClown12joke11BoardGame10basketballTW9PSP-PSV9PublicServan9cohabitation8Insurance7BabyMother5home-sale5Hong_Kong5Monkeys5MP3-player5TOEIC5Baseball4CarShop4Civil4GoodPregnan4HatePicket4iPod4WomenTalk4graduate3LawsuitSug3Lifeismoney3politics3Sijhih3study3Broken-heart2car2drawing2HatePolitics2HSNU_j1022marriage2Master_D2movie2NBA2NCUECON962Patent2TaichungBun2TKU_EW94B2Trans-nthu2TTU-AMath2Violation2WorldCup2AntiVirus1Artistic-Pho1ASHS-94-ye1BBSmovie1Beauty1BoardCourt1Cancer1CCJH-89g-3141CCU-GIE951CH7th3101CJCU1ck54th3311CMU_M511colorguard011CSMU-HSA961CSMU-M-SPORT1CTSH963011CYCU_CE92B1Dragons1DYU1EuropeTravel1FCSH_133101Finn1FJU-ACCR931FJU-ACCR941Free_box1FSHS-95-3081FTP1GuardRookies1Haruhi1HDFS_Bball1HSNU_10851HSNU_10981HSNU_11151HSNU_11171ISU_PBCM991Jeremy_Lin1JesusLove1KG92-3231KS94-3021KS94-3201L_LifePlan1MacShop1MCU-LAW1Militarylife1NBA_Film1NCCU07_Ghis1NCHU-AS1NCHU-FT-1011NCHU-KF1NCHUS1NCKU-PH991NCKU-physiol1NCYU_BE_95A1NDMC-PH231NTHU-EE-CAPT1NTHU_COM6071NTHU_STAT941NTPU-CRIM941NTPU-LAND90B1NTPU-STAT951NTPU-STATBAD1NTU-Karate1NTUE-DC991NTUST-MBA961NTUST-TIM961NTUT_Talk1NUK_AC981NY-Yankees1Old-Games1pay_home1Pet_boarding1petwork1PlayBaseball1SCU-BM-93B1SENIORHIGH1share1Softball1Stephen1Stock1taipin3261Taitung1Taoyuan1TigerBlue1TNFSH96121toberich1TuCheng1TWproducts1TY_Research1Wanted1YP91-3041Zhongshan1<< 收起看板(163)
3F→:快門更快或光圈調小,白平衡調整日光01/17 11:05
4F→:事故就在家旁邊......01/17 09:04
4F→:正妹的圖咧?12/22 22:38
6F推:燈神!燈神!11/29 17:22
8F→:前幾天同事團購買了香菇來種XD 可以照非微距版的嗎11/29 14:18
33F→:可否看看您的作品?11/29 14:19
41F→:你仔細看結婚板有些朋友的婚紗分享文,人像很多張是糊糊的11/29 14:35
3F→:2F+111/23 15:40
10F→:誒敢告就補他個誣告罪,順便請法院認證11/17 14:25
12F→:八成?理由是?11/17 21:39
13F→:說成立或不成立都可以,但沒有理由就無從討論了11/17 21:43
14F→:欠缺誣告故意?有阻確違法事由?11/17 21:46
17F→:法律見解沒有爭議,但事實涵攝是否如此,可是完全不同事情11/17 22:06
18F→:如同他們告鄉民誹謗或公然污辱是否成立意思相同。11/17 22:08
19F→:如果他們就是意圖要入罪於人,且客觀情事難認出於誤會,我11/17 22:13
22F→:不認為否定誣告罪成立的機會很大。11/17 22:16
25F→:判例表示的法律見解無法脫離該判例的事實11/17 22:18
26F→:判例不是法律,最多有事實上拘束力,但絕非成文化的法律效11/17 22:20
27F→:最重要仍是認定的事實。涵攝事實才是核心。11/17 22:22
29F→:說說我的誤會是?11/17 22:27
31F→:您也許参考釋576中,許宗力大法官不同意見書?11/17 22:43
33F推:我並沒說判例表示的法律見解錯,不過這邊不適合說太深入11/17 23:36
34F→:多數官司勝敗關鍵是法院認定的事實,少數才是法律見解11/17 23:40
6F→:說的出合理隱私期待的人應該多少涉獵法律,見釋689許宗力11/17 15:40